Paul G. Humber is the director of CR Ministries and author
of things like 400+ Prophecies,
Appearances, or Foreshadowings of Christ in the Tanakh and Evolution Exposed. Humber is, of course,
a young-earth creationist,
and has also penned articles for the Institute of Creation Research and Creation Matters, the newsletter
of the Creation Research Society (both organization apparently put “Research”
in their name since otherwise no one would ever have guessed that this is what
they think they are doing).
Well, Humber’s writings on science contain the usual tropes,
appeal to the Bible, obvious lack of expertise and rank denialism, and we’ll
limit ourselves to an example: One obvious problem for young-earth creationists
is radioactive decay, which rather clearly, uh, suggests that the Earth is
somewhat older than they’d like to think. Their solution is of course to
(completely out of the blue) assert that radioactive decay isn’t constant but
happened much faster in the past. So here’s Humber:
“[C]onsider
Deuteronomy 32:22 – ‘For a fire is kindled by My anger, and it burns to the
depths of Sheol, devours the earth and its increase, and sets on fire the
foundations of mountains.’ This verse may point us in the direction that
radioactive decay is a physical manifestation of God’s anger against evil,
affecting even biological life. Prior to the Noachian flood, mankind lived much
longer. His lifespan has diminished substantially since the flood. Also, even
though Noah might well have had some immature dinosaurs on the ark, their
nearly total extinction following the flood seems obvious. This also holds with
respect to many other animals that have become extinct.”
Or put differently:
radioactive decay can’t be used to measure the age of anything, but is instead
a measure of how angry God is at any moment. It’s hard to express how mind-boggling
it is that anyone above the age of 7 can write this with a straight face and
expect to be taken seriously (it’s at the level of “rain is angels relieving themselves”), but at least it entails that
God is much less angry these days and accordingly unlikely to be overly
concerned with gay marriage, abortion or transgender people using their
bathroom of choice.
Here is Humber on Nebraska Man,
an incident that really shows science working the way it should,
but which to Humber is, irrationally, a reason to dismiss science in general if
it doesn’t fit with what he has already convinced himself that he wants to
believe.
Diagnosis: Oh, you silly duck. All the facepalms in the
world wouldn’t reflect how crazy and silly Humber’s pseudoscientific babbling
is, yet he is apparently viewed as an authority in certain quarters.
Silly me, I thought rain was angels shedding tears of joy every time pat robertson made another buck. But I guess piss does make more sense. What a great educational resource you've got here!
ReplyDeleteYou ought to take a look at Ben Kissling
ReplyDeletehttp://www.dailynebraskan.com/ben-kissling-think-for-yourself-on-intelligent-design/article_1b3b491c-3ee9-55e5-85ee-290c936fe886.html
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/2016/01/13/editorial-we-recommend-ron-simmons-in-gop-race-for-texas-house-district-65
It's an honor being associated with such people as David Barton, Jerry Bergman, Chuck Colson, and Dinesh D’Sousa. I challenge the readers who think I may be am “loony” to watch this video of mine: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWKRcXG3jV8
ReplyDeleteHey Paul,
DeleteWe don't "think" you are loony. We know you are. Does that clear it up ?
Why are all these creationists so bad at internet behaviour? Don't you know that commenting on an article being critical of you makes you look silly? Heck, linking a video makes you look even more silly! How about this. Instead of being a whiner who cries conspiracy, how about taking the time to prove the author wrong? If you're right and can prove it I'm sure many people will agree with you. But something seems fishy here, you probably don't have that. That's why you rely on copy pasta. Tsk Tsk.
DeleteWhy are all these creationists so bad at internet behaviour? Don't you know that commenting on an article being critical of you makes you look silly? Heck, linking a video makes you look even more silly! How about this. Instead of being a whiner who cries conspiracy, how about taking the time to prove the author wrong? If you're right and can prove it I'm sure many people will agree with you. But something seems fishy here, you probably don't have that. That's why you rely on copy pasta. Tsk Tsk.
DeletePaul Number, never misses a chance to spam.
DeleteHey Paul Humber! Remember that time when you blatantly lied in the Creationism Facebook group about a 1996 issue of National Geographic stating that "Lucy" was not a hominid? And remember how I had that issue in my collection and posted images or the article in question for all to see. Your response was to block me, you filthy lying coward.
ReplyDeleteAnd what a shock, you worship fellow liars like Barton and D'Souza.
I have seen Paul lie quite a few times in the Creationism Facebook group. He then proceeds to block anyone (including me) who points out when he lies. His ability to comprehend even the most rudimentary of concepts is also staggeringly limited.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSeriously - check out Ben Kissling - https://www.facebook.com/groups/31425129128/permalink/10155742579894129/
ReplyDeleteIf you really want to see the absolute lunacy of Paul G Humber...watch this video of him trying to debate an actual physicist. He didn't even have a grade school understanding of the topics being presented. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhJlelEZ9YU
ReplyDeleteAd hominem is not a convincing way to argue your objections nor is saying that you hate his argument. This says more about you than it does about him. Engage him. Don't just lob rocks at him.
ReplyDelete