tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-414946164942126209.post7962986118261665697..comments2024-03-28T06:33:02.061-04:00Comments on Encyclopedia of American Loons: #383: Ginger TaylorG.D.http://www.blogger.com/profile/08875360501107597863noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-414946164942126209.post-59474842691538634612017-08-02T23:13:14.555-04:002017-08-02T23:13:14.555-04:00I'll just leave this for you, Max. That is, if...I'll just leave this for you, Max. That is, if you can read.<br /><br />https://spectrumnews.org/opinion/viewpoint/1977-paper-on-the-first-autism-twin-study/Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18378384972601719369noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-414946164942126209.post-24291171293096655472013-12-08T13:15:04.103-05:002013-12-08T13:15:04.103-05:00Ginger Taylor was set straight on her own blog, an...Ginger Taylor <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/09/26/in-which-antivaccinationist-ginger-taylor-is-taught-a-lesson-and-not-by-orac/" rel="nofollow">was set straight on her own blog</a>, and reacted the way you'd expect - by deleting the comment.G.D.https://www.blogger.com/profile/08875360501107597863noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-414946164942126209.post-49629594138419849702013-02-08T19:41:43.168-05:002013-02-08T19:41:43.168-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Rockin Moms World . Comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05006327536834582949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-414946164942126209.post-34636091669335773742013-02-05T19:12:39.674-05:002013-02-05T19:12:39.674-05:00I have no idea what you think that 2011 article sh...I have no idea what you think that 2011 article shows that challenges anything I have said, though perhaps that's not the point?<br /><br />The vaccine-autism link has been discredited by an overwhelming and uniform body of literature, so much so that anyone who is able to rationally assess evidence would be forced to say that it's conclusive. Your ad hominem argument involving one of the people involved in vaccine research, Paul Offit, is weirdly irrelevant in that respect. <br /><br />I suggest keeping in mind one of the oldest rules of rational debate when you evaluate Offit's work: "You are not allowed to try to explain *why* someone is wrong before you have shown that they *are*, in fact, wrong." You haven't even tried to engage with Offit's actual research before you launch your pharma shill gambit - the typical ploy of a critical thinking-challenged conspiracy theorists.G.D.https://www.blogger.com/profile/08875360501107597863noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-414946164942126209.post-17612507853341707762013-02-05T19:00:45.625-05:002013-02-05T19:00:45.625-05:00And.. by the way... your likely hero, Paul Offit e...And.. by the way... your likely hero, Paul Offit evidently "proved" Wakefield wrong. I feel so great about that. Nevermind that Offit holds patents on the vaccines or anything. Nothing to see here... move on... no man behind the curtain.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-414946164942126209.post-63486635908065162532013-02-05T18:58:21.959-05:002013-02-05T18:58:21.959-05:00You may want to read this http://www.scientificame...You may want to read this http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=discredited-vaccine-autism<br /><br />Just sayin.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com