A.k.a. The Genesis Genius
A.k.a. Ephriam
Herman Cummings is, according to
himself, “the leading expert on the book of Genesis” (“[t]here is no ‘close
second’”), which he also interprets as more or less literal truth (“Genesis is
a book of history, and advanced math & science, being literally true”). So
much for his expertise. He is also the author of the book Moses Didn’t Write About Creation! which apparently is based on a
revelation from “Lord Jesus” he received back in 1991.
One of Cummings’s endeavors is to
instruct science teachers. In 2008 he apparently
offered his service to Louisiana, where teachers have the “
academic freedom” to use “
supplemental materials” in science classes. What could he offer? “
I
teach a 6-hr class for science teachers which gives them an overview of the
first three chapters of Genesis, as it pertains to the appearance, and
extinction, of life forms during the geologic history of Earth. This is the
correct opposing view of evolution as should be presented in biology classes.
Creationism is not the opposing view to evolution. Creationism would oppose the
theory of the ‘Big Bang’.” We are not completely sure what he is talking
about but are pretty sure that he doesn’t either. But in more detail his offer
was: “
[B]y providing my class to your teachers,
I also give protection against lawsuits which the ACLU is certainly anxious to
file. I contacted the Dover Area school district in Pennsylvania, but they ignored me, and they lost both their jobs
and the court case. I contacted both the Cobb County Board members and their
law firm in Georgia, in 2004, and they both ignored me, and they lost their
district case. I know how to defeat the ACLU in open court in such cases, to
the point that they would be discouraged from filing such lawsuits again. But I
would have to be invited to work with the defense.”
We are not sure anyone took him up
on his offer. He also contacted the Discovery Institute “
in an effort to create a united front against the false teaching of
evolution,” and
informed them that “
‘ID’ is a waste of scholastic time, and
is too inept and shallow to be of much value.” Even
Barbara Cargill ignored him,
and she has certainly failed to ignore some pretty ridiculous stuff in the past.
So, yes: home-made theory; declares himself an expert (but has no relevant
education); rejects virtually all of science; everyone else is wrong; tries to
promote it by
sending letters to institutions and organizations,
including the White House, Congress, the US Dept. of education, “every State Governor”
and the Pope;
seems to be confused when
they don’t respond or
he isn’t taken seriously (“[s]o far, every ‘so called’ rabbi/scholar I’ve written to (830+) in the USA
& Israel has either been an infidel (denying the truth of the Pentateuch),
or a scriptural coward”) and
concludes that they’re afraid of him;
and his enemies (the ACLU)
should be
afraid of him, since he is completely able to beat them up.
We’ve covered these kinds of people before.
But what, exactly, are
his objections to evolution? Ah, glad you asked. It really deserves to be given
some space:
“
Which came first, the chicken or the
egg? Fish, reptiles, and birds lay eggs. If these adult species are only given
life by means of the egg hatching process, how did the first fish, reptiles and
birds come into existence? Evolution? If so, why isn’t all life hatched out of
an egg? Is this to be explained with the same sort of reasoning which produced
the theory that a bear fell into a lake/river and became a whale? Let’s address
the “chicken or the egg” question. An egg cannot just drop out of the sky, or
wash upon the shore all by itself. An egg, which signifies life waiting to
develop, has to be laid by a egg laying female animal, unless you want think up
a theory on how the first egg materialized….; those that are in denial can go
there. Therefore, let us focus on the female chicken, or actually the hen. The
hen can lay eggs without the rooster, but the eggs will not produce life (will
not hatch). So little chicks can’t come into existence (in the wild or in the
distant past) without the hen mating with the rooster. Therefore, both the hen
and the rooster came first.” And the fact that scientists don’t see this
and immediately reject evolution is apparently proof of a conspiracy. The whole
of science seems to be a conspiracy, in fact: “Why is it that the scientific
world will hide information from the public, such as the truth about Comet
Showmaker-Levy-9 [
sic],
to avoid answering certain questions?” Evolution is also
a doctrine of atheism and therefore a religious belief, and as such – unlike (his version of) creationism –
illegal to teach in public schools.
So, what about creationism? “
Genesis 1:1 should be interpreted as ‘4.6
billion years ago, God created this universe, starting with the planet Earth’.
Yes, Earth was the first, and is the principle celestial object in this
universe. All of the other objects in this universe are at least two days
younger than our Earth. So now, you should be able to determine that I am not
‘young Earth’, and that I embrace the literal meaning of the scriptures, unlike
‘old Earth’ creationism. Reconciliation was achieved seventeen years ago [that
was his 1991 revelation –
apparently it said,
simply, that “the days in Genesis are not in one week”]
.”
9/11 can be blamed on our failure to see the truth.
And
his own view?
“
Adam was formed in about 7200 BC. The
modern animals, along with the birds, were made in about 7100 BC, and Eve came
along in about 7000 BC. I’m guessing that the animals lived in and out of the
Garden, and Adam probably took Eve out on sight-seeing trips to lands
surrounding the Garden. They did this for 2,733 years…, until they ate of the
evil tree. It is then that the years of Adam’s age begins to be counted,
because that is when he ‘began to die’. So from 7200 BC, till 3337 BC, when
Adam died, Adam had lived for 3,863 years.” Apparently only Herman Cummings
knows this. He is also the only one who knows that “
Genesis is declaring the existence of pre-historic man, which lived
more than 60 million years before God made Adam and Eve. The world of science
won’t admit to mankind being on Earth any earlier than 10 million years ago…,
which shows how misinformed they are. Or is it that they are in denial?”
There is a simpler explanation, but that one has apparently not occurred to
him.
But he has evidence, doesn’t he? “
Why has the news media failed to publicize
the discovery of a man-made pyramid, from the Jurassic period? A Ukrainian
scientist made the discovery in his native land […] This proves mankind was
here more than 65 million years ago. Another foolish theory (evolution) bites
the dust. […]” Oh, yes – bring it on: “
The
Ark of the Covenant was found several years ago, and will be shown to the
public in about three years. You can be learn about it by going to these links
[not replicated here].” Moreover, “
NASA
found out that the Moon is hollow, when they exploded a bomb in an effort to widen an opening at its
south pole. The Moon rang like a bell for several hours, causing a BIG
surprise,” which means that “
the Earth is also hollow, which proves the (false) theories of
science to be in error.” And so it goes.
Diagnosis: Internet access has not
been an indisputable blessing to everyone. At least we noticed Herman Cummings, even if Popes and presidents did not.