Gary Ezzo is a self-proclaimed expert on raising children.
No, he has no formal education in anything related to it, but he sure is a
religious fundamentalist, and that should apparently weigh up for his lack of
insight, evidence and reason.
He is most famous for the book On Becoming Baby Wise: Giving Your Infant the Gift of Nighttime Sleep,
coauthored with the conservative Christian pediatrician Robert Bucknam, which
concerns raising infants and emphasizes parental control of the infant's sleep,
play and feeding schedule instead of allowing the baby to decide when to eat,
play and sleep, and contains advice that, to put it mildly, is not generally
recommended by pediatricians (some of the dangers are discussed here),
mostly under the framework of “Jesus suffered, so it's important for kids to
suffer to learn to obey.” That’s what passes for reason and evidence. There is
a good resource on the Ezzo-methods here.
At least the book and program have brought the Ezzos their share of fame and
fortune.
The full title of the earlier edition of the book, by Gary
and his wife Anne Marie, was Preparation
for Parenting: Bringing God's Order to Your Baby's Day and Restful Sleep to
Your Baby's Night. That edition was denounced even by Ezzo’s own church
(partially for its ascription of Biblical qualities to the concept of scheduled
feeding, and for failing to address the church's concerns about human depravity
and regeneration). According to the Ezzos “[t]he book justified the act of
leaving a baby to cry alone by comparing that choice to the crucifixion of
Jesus: ‘Praise God that the Father did not intervene when His Son cried out on
the cross’,” which would not quite count as evidential support if the Ezzos
tried to publish their screeds in a psychology journal.
Babywise was the secularized second
edition of the book, though for some reason it tended to appeal primarily to
fundies, though most religious institutions have rejected it as dangerous crackpottery as well.
The governing idea in the second version was still that
parents are locked in combat with infants, and that it is a battle the parents
have to win. And it is still widely used in religious courses on child-rearing – according to one of the Ezzos’ regional directors, David Good, “[t]he program
produces kids who are submissive, respectful of elders and with a spark of
fun.” No, he produced no evidence for that claim.
Dangerous crackpot ideas about childrearing have real
potential among certain religious fundies. Another example would be To Train Up a Child by Michael & Debi Pearl,
but the Pearls will be covered later.
Diagnosis: I suppose there may be something charmingly
Biblical about building your (substantial) wealth on hurt and harmed babies.
Given the lasting popularity of the book, Gary Ezzo and his accomplices must
count among the most dangerous and harmful crackpots out there (despite rather
tough competition).
I'm not sure what the real name of Sister Toldjah is, but I think she deserves an entry simply for her complete inability to even consider the possibility that she might not be right all the time. And for her vileness and stupidity.
ReplyDeleteFor the F's coming up I have a list of nominiees:
Virginia Foxx (the Sarah Palin of North Carolina)
Ezola Foster (Pat Buchanan's running made in 2000, claimed that black people were better off under slavery than welfare "socialism")
Becky Fischer (of the documentary "Jesus Camp," not related to Bryan Fischer, who looks almost halfway sane in comparison)
Randy Forbes (theocrat)
Glib Fortuna (anti-ACLU nutball that Ed Brayton made fun of back in 2007)