Monday, February 24, 2025

#2866: Elena Frid

Chronic lyme is a fake diagnosis. Since many people nevertheless think that they suffer from chronic lyme, however, there is a market for ‘treatments’, and a whole cottage industry has popped up to take advantage of the situation. Even a number of real MDs have joined that bandwagon – these even have their own moniker lyme literate doctors, and are organized into the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society (ILADS), one of the most dangerous and aggressive quack organizations that has ever existedclaiming that the symptoms experienced by their patients are due to chronic persistent infection with B. burgdorferi (or other Borrelia species of bacteria that can cause Lyme disease), and prescribing long term antibiotics as treatment; or, since long-term antibiotics will do nothing for the symptoms, various types of quackery that work equally well. And no, there is no evidence that chronic Lyme disease exists (this is not really controversial), but there are several randomized clinical trials that unambigously show very clearly that long term antibiotics does not help and is harmful.

 

Elena Frid is one such “lyme literate” doctor. Frid is a New York-based neurologist and clinical neurophysiologist and has been a prominent champion for getting (chronic) lyme disease recognized as “a human rights concern” – several media outlets, such as Huffpo (not a trustworthy source on medical claims), have promoted her work. So why does medical consensus disagree with her? Frid blames the tests: “the test that we have now is up to 50-70% inaccurate in some instances. Intern, if you test negative for Lyme disease on regular blood work – it doesn’t mean you don’t have Lyme.” Frid (and her associates) has her own tests that yield far more positive results – don’t you worry; Frid will find lyme.

 

Then there is this, though we emphasize that we don’t know the context.

 

Diagnosis: Yes, she’s got credentials. That doesn’t entail that her claims about lyme disease are evidence-based – they clearly aren’t. Avoid.

No comments:

Post a Comment