Wednesday, February 18, 2026

#2987: Aaron Hartman (?)

Aaron Hartman is a Richmond-based family physician who is also one of many (see e.g. last entry on Angelique Hart) who has recognized the financial benefits of incorporating non-mainstream modalities into their practices and who, because he has no scruples he has an open mind, has promptly joined the dark side. In addition to his main practice, Hartman sees patients through Richmond Integrative & Functional Medicine, which he launched in early 2017 to target those who are either gullible or somewhat desperate because they can’t find a proper treatment for whatever ails them in conventional medicine, and who has money to spare. As with functional medicine practitioners in general, Hartman offers a range of alternative treatments, including intravenous vitamin C and other supplements. And he’s got anecdotes and marketing glitter to prop up his recommendations (there’s little else).

 

Functional medicine, as we’ve had ample opportunity to note (e.g. here), is quackery: Basically, the idea – insofar as there is a clear idea – is to run a battery of often expensive tests, usually including dubious ones, for anything whatsoever to see if some value along any parameter is unusual. Or, in other words, if you don’t know of anything wrong, they’ll find something. Then they prescribe some unnecessary and often questionable (as in the case of Hartman) treatment regime to address it. Of course it’s lucrative (marketing gambit: the diagnoses and treatment regimes are personalized). And as an added boon, the practitioner will frequently be able to harvest some testimonials, since whatever they addressed was actually not anything that bothered you neither before nor after treatment and you, as a patient, won’t know that it didn’t need addressing and will base your assessment on what the practitioner says.

 

How lucrative? Well, Hartman also offers a membership program – i.e., he runs a quack concierge medical service – which, for the regular plan, requires a membership induction fee of $730 and a monthly maintenance fee of $135 (during the next 12 months of membership); the executive “optimum wellness plan, however, is a fair $1,500, although it offers, in addition to access to the practice, “advanced testing”, including organic acid analysis, comprehensive stool genomic and functional analysis, nutritional analysis, and something called a “comprehensive vascular biological inflammatory analysis”.

 

Diagnosis: It is, of course, hard to sustain the belief that Hartman is merely a loon, but we’ll tactfully assume that it is. And there are lots of these people out there.

 

Hat-tip: Respectful Insolence

 

Monday, February 16, 2026

#2986: Angelique Hart

Angelique Hart is an Albuquerque-based MD who has, as so many others, been lured by the lucrative scam of integrative medicine and joined the dark side of altmed grifting. Her website tells us that she “works with each patient to get to the root cause of the problem” (insinuating that conventional medicine generally doesn’t), and it has a prominently placed store section where you can purchase useless but expensive supplements – which should at least deter those aware of the first rule of online medical advice (don’t take it from anyone with a store section on their website) but unfortunately not deter a rather significant target base of potential customers.

 

Hart offers “regenerative & holistic services”, including useless vampire facials and IV nutrient therapies that purportedly help you “[r]ejuvenate, [d]etoxify, and [h]eal from [w]ithin” and which are highly popular among quacks – and yes, she’ll offer the whole range of IV quackery, from Myers’ cocktail and high-dose Vitamin C, to alpha lipoic acid, glutathione therapy, and detox & chelation therapy. Indeed, Hart’s offerings and recommendations encompass an impressive range of questionable methods and quackery, including hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

 

Diagnosis: It’s not like there isn’t a massive number of these, and covering even a sample of them would be a Herculean (and repetitive) task. Hart, anyways, seems to be a relatively prominent representative of these slick marketers of nonsense and bullshit.

 

Friday, February 13, 2026

#2985: Brian Harrison

Brian W. Harrison is an Australian-born, Missouri-based Roman Catholic priest and theologian, emeritus professor of theology at the Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico, and associate editor of Living Tradition, a publication of the Roman Theological Forum hosted by the Oblates of Wisdom in St Louis. Harrison is also, contrary to official Catholic doctrine, a young earth creationist and demonstrably scientifically illiterate.

 

So, according to Harrison, “[i]t is a core element of science that any finding must be reproducible if it is to be valid. Someone must be able to do the same experiment and get the same results. Well, since evolutionary theory plainly lacks that core element, it is not science. The supposed development of all different phyla (macroevolution) from a hypothetical original cell cannot be observed, much less experimentally reproduced.” … which of course demonstrates a misunderstanding of reproducibility and observability that would (hopefully) ensure that Harrison would fail any legitimate high school science class. And if anyone here is actually unsure but don’t dare to ask:

 

-       Yes, science deals with observations. But there is, of course, no requirement that the phenomena described by a scientific hypothesis or theory should be observable – they usually aren’t – but that the hypothesis yields observable predictions. The theory of evolution does – including predictions e.g. on what fossils one will find in various geological strata. Harrison is illiterate.

-       Yes, scientific results should be replicable. But that means that scientists checking your data or scientists using different methods to gather data should arrive at the same conclusions. It does not mean that the hypothesized phenomenon should be repeated – detectives investigating a murder do not need to commit the murder again for their evidence to count. Good grief. Harrison is dazzlingly illiterate and stupid about these things.  

 

Oh, but Harrison has other objections, too: creationism is ruled out by fiat: “One of evolution’s own core elements is the highly debatable philosophical assumption that all observable phenomena are to be explained by natural causes alone, i.e., excluding any appeal to divine intervention or revelation.” Here, Harrison’s misunderstanding is arguably more understandable: Harrison is appealing to the myth of methodological naturalism, that the assumption of “no magic” is some sort of operational constraint on science. And in fairness: We have seen intelligent people who should know better invoke that myth, too. But it is of course bonkers bullshit – and seeing that methodological naturalism is a myth requires only a moment’s reflection (how could science have arrived at quantum mechanics if it were constrained by substantial metaphysical assumptions about causality?). In reality, science is constrained by empiricism: evidence for or against a hypothesis is acquired by checking whether the hypothesis’s observable predicitions are accurate. If you wish to invoke God or magic to explain the development of life, feel free – but what you need, in that case, is an operationalized concept of God or magic that allows you to actually derive observable predictions from your hypothesis (something creationists refuse to do), and then check whether your hypothesis does a better job of predicting and explaining the data than alternative hypotheses. If it does, you win. But no creationist has, of course, ever even gotten close, for obvious reasons (a hypothesis that is sufficiently precise to actually yield predictions is, after all, also a falsifiable hypothesis).

 

Diagnosis: Complete ignorance about a field and confidence in one’s assertion about that field is a pretty common combination. Harrison’s ignorance and illiteracy is spectacular but hardly novel – we have heard his nonsense many times before. Fundie dolt.

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

#2984: Steven J. Harris

Chronic Lyme is not a genuine diagnosis. People who think they suffer from chronic Lyme (but don’t) are really suffering, however, and since most medical organizations have standards and observe things like accuracy and accountability, they are often unable to come up with clear answers or help to these people. So we have a discrepancy here, ready to be filled by conmen and opportunists. Lyme-literate Doctors is a group of scammers, conspiracy theorists and confused medical providers (it is usually hard to determine to which subgroup particular members belong) who have decided, for various reasons, to grab the opportunity and dazzle people in vulnerable positions with the trappings of recognition and care, pseudoscience and expensive bullshit. They are organized in the group the International Lyme and Associated Disease (ILADS), which provide rather aggressive support, including legal support, for whatever quackery any one of their affiliated doctors might decide to engage in. And the organization has become rather powerful.

 

Steven Jeffrey Harris, a California-based physician and the son of ILADS cofounder and IgeneX founder Nick Harris, is a bit of a celebrity in chronic Lyme circles and a central member of ILADS and Lymedisease.org (formerly CALDA) as well as a “clinical consultant” for IgeneX, all organizations famous for spreading misinformation about Lyme disease. Though he is board certified in Family Medicine, Harris has no recognized advanced credentials in infectious diseases, and it is notable that he practices in California, where real Lyme disease is rather uncommon – people who think they suffer from chronic Lyme are not that rare, however, and Harris has received some attention for his work with celebrities, like Kris Kristoffersen, whom Harris treated with a.o. antibiotic intramuscular injections, which has of course no effect on a condition that doesn’t exist but may decimate the patient’s natural bacterial flora and breed resistant bacteria (as well as giving the impression that the patient is taken seriously).

 

Harris’s dubious practices haven’t quite escaped attention. In 2013, the Medical Board of California charged him with Gross Negligence and/or Repeated Negligent Acts and/or Incompetence with respect to three patients, to whom Harris had recommended a variety of quackery, including bizarre drug cocktails, lab tests, and visits to doctors and alternative practitioners. The nonsense included dozens of medications and homeopathic remedies, and at least one of the patients suffered life threatening complications from the treatments, despite no plausible evidence that any of them were suffering from what Harris claimed they were suffering from. Even so, the reprimand, probably due to California’s Lyme quack protection law, only applied to the intravenous garlic Harris had prescribed to two of them – although at least the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation refused to renew his license to practice medicine. (The complaint also listed one Y.L., presumably Harris’s long-time employee Yvonne Lin Sorenson, and C.R., presumably naturopath Claire Riendeau, whose website has listed Harris as one of her advisers.)

 

Harris has apparently also suggested, utterly ridiculously, that there might be a link between Lyme disease and autism, and he has allegedly also supplied patients to Indian predatory stem cell clinic Nutech Mediworld.

 

Diagnosis: A genuine public menace. Avoid at all cost.

 

Hat-tip: Lymescience.org

 

Monday, February 9, 2026

#2983: Steve Harris

The 2020 book America’s Secret History: How the Deep State, The Fed, The JFK, MLK, and RFK Assassinations, And Much More Led to Donald Trump's Presidency, which purports to contain “the truth behind the stories they don’t want you to know”, might perhaps be judged to be the epitome of 20th- and early 21st-century conspiracy thinking, and a potentially canonical text for QAnon-adjacent activists (were it not for such groups’ proclivity to suspect anything like this of being establishment psyops). The book promotes pretty much every significant and familiar politically-oriented conspiracy theory you can think of, and purports to offer e.g. conclusive proof that Sirhan B. Sirhan didn’t kill RFK, that James Earl Ray did not kill Martin Luther King, Jr. – the book instead blames (of course) the US Government, the FBI, and the city of Memphis of first conspiring to kill MLK and then cover it up – that the establishments of the Carnegie, Rockefeller and Ford Foundations were the beginning of The Deep State, and that John Hinckley, Jr., who tried to assassinate Reagan in 1981, was an agent of George Bush Sr. Also, of course, 9/11 was an inside job (controlled demolition), and so on. At least the book manages to utilize an impressive number of deranged historical sources, including paranoid anti-communist government reports from the 1950s like the Reece Report, and embellishes them with wild-eyed speculation. The book was, of course, well received by other conspiracy theory authors. We don’t have much other information on the book’s author, Steve Harris (he may or may not have written a number of other books (the name is common enough to make it hard to determine), except that he seems to be something of a veteran on the ‘alternative history’ stage, but judging his level of trustworthiness on the contents of America’s Secret History doesn’t exactly suggest any point to investigating further.

 

Diagnosis: Admittedly more of a ‘classic’ conspiracy theorist than a QAnon- or altright-related one. Still.

 

Friday, February 6, 2026

#2982: Samantha Harris

Samantha E. Harris is a “demonologist, deliverance minister, guest TV host, director of MPRA” (the “Michigan Paranormal Research Association”), “psychic, and spiritual healer” – yes, she is an adult person who fails to distinguish Poltergeist and The Conjuring franchises from real life (or, as she puts it herself: “The Exorcism of Emily Rose and The Exorcist are two of the more accurate films depicting demonic possession in Hollywood productions”). Her career is devoted to removing hauntings and demons  – basically performing ‘blessings’: “[a]s of 2017, she has performed over 120 house blessings for severe hauntings and counting” – and to ‘educate’ people on how to avoid such things: it’s basically the tricks you’ll find featured in the aforementioned movies. Her work has been featured on venerable purveyors of evidence-based information like the Travel Channel and the Discovery Channel. Insofar as she is “a sensitive”, her “most personal and frequent experiences are: dream premonitions, intense empathy, and discerning spirits/energy”, or in other words: Her standard of assessment for her choices, diagnoses and assessments are largely whatever she feels about the issue at hand. She also has a book, Fighting Malevolent Spirits: A Demonologist’s Darkest Encounters, which we admit to not having read.

 

The MPRA, on its side, was “established to allow experienced paranormal groups in Michigan to unite, creating a paranormal think-tank and allowing groups to assist each other with educating, training, experience, scheduling and manpower”; its website really fulfills all your preconceptions about paranormal research, with its commitment to horror-movie aesthetics (fuzzy black-and-white pictures of old abandoned houses and so on), and thoroughly fails to dispel the suspicion that they’re not entirely serious.

 

Diagnosis: Whatever. Probably mostly harmless.


Wednesday, February 4, 2026

#2981: Cliff Harris

Cliff Harris is an End Times preacher, climate change denialist and general conspiracy theorist. Harris is perhaps most notable for his book Weather and Bible Prophecy, which is signed “Climatologist Cliff Harris”, although it is difficult to find any information on his credentials, education or any research background whatsoever other than him having been involved in something called Harris-Mann Climatology, which seems to be little more than a (now-defunct) website, with fellow fundie endtimes loon Randy Mann (you can find some discussion on some of their work in the comments here). His own website lists him as one of the “top 10 climatologists in the world”, but it is unclear on what that assessment is based given that he has no discernible credentials or scientific publication record.

 

In any case, his book – for which we cannot find any publisher info – putatively explores the link between weather events and biblical prophecies, in particular prophecies connected to the End Times: weather and climate events are ostensibly means God use to draw attention to himself (apparently with varying success), and play some role (we can’t manage to motivate ourselves to delve into details) in the potential emergence of “New Jerusalem”. At least Harris is clear that climate change, as understood by scientific communities, is a “hoax” being used to grow the size of government. And growing the size of government is, of course, deeply unChristian and a mark of the end times: In a discussion with Rick Wiles, for instance, Harris claimed that the mass support for Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign in 2015 is clear evidence that the second coming of Jesus is imminent.

 

In parallel with his scrapbook projects on climate, Harris has also been pushing geoengineering and chemtrail conspiracy theories, claiming for instance that chemtrails are a significant cause of allergies, chronic illnesses and ‘flu-like symptoms’ across America. His expertise in medicine roughly parallels his expertise on climate.

 

Diagnosis: Completely bonkers, but it seems that his feeble analyses have had some impact in denialist communities – and possibly even among people with actual power (there are some references to them even in government documents). And if the lunatic rants of Cliff Harris don’t fail to find traction, it's hard to hold on to the hope that there are any boundaries whatsoever.


Monday, February 2, 2026

#2980: Barbara Harper

Water-birthing, the practice of delivering a baby into a body of water, even a putatively sterile one, is inherently risky and has no benefits for anything whatsoever, something that is pretty obvious even to people with little medical experience. The practice has nevertheless had a run as a woo fad, because of course it has. There is a decent discussion of the practice here.

 

An influential and thoroughly woo-infused resource for the practice of waterbirthing is something called Waterbirth International, which is run by Barbara Harper, a nurse who is also a proponent of rebirthing-breathwork., the idea that suppressed negative emotions can be healed by ‘reliving one’s birth’ while … breathing. Harper and Waterbirth International apparently promote waterbirthing all over the world with plenty of incoherent New Age fluff (including, apparently, something about your cells having feelings) centered on the desire for a drug-free childbirth based on a fallacious appeal to nature; you don’t need to ask her what definition of ‘natural’ makes waterbirthing natural. And her response to reluctance from actual MDs and people who know things about medicine (and risk) is entirely predictable: the backlash is a result of the fact that with a waterbirth “you as the attending physician pretty much have to stand there with your hands in your pockets and let it happen without your participation. That is pretty scary to a physician-oriented institution.” She doesn’t address concerns referring to risks. She does, however, express some rather striking and frightening misconceptions about human physiology and childbirth.

 

In fact, there is some research on the practice, which also summarizes the existing evidence of benefits – which is precisely what you’d expect: “most published articles that recommend underwater births are retrospective reviews of a single center experience, observational studies using historical controls, or personal opinions and testimonials, often in publications that are not peer reviewed”. There is, as the study obviously has to point out, also a stark absence of basic science to support the proposed physiologic benefits.

 

Diagnosis: In fairness, complications from waterbirthing are probably relatively rare if conducted in the presence of a medical professional. Harper might, as such, not be more than a moderate danger to her environment. But her misconceptions and woo are certainly not benign.

 

Hat-tip: Clay Jones @ Sciencebasedmedicine


Friday, January 30, 2026

#2979: Karen Hardin

More prophets and intercessors! There’s plenty of them, and every single one really qualifies for an entry here. Karen Hardin is an an intercessor, literary agent, co-founder of the City-by-City prayer movement, and author, who, with her husband, Kevin, leads Destiny Builders and leads prayer teams in DC – and yes, she has the ears of leaders: In 2019, for instance, she met with White House staff and reported thatthey expressed great concern for the increased attacks and threats against [Trump] and have called for a corporate Esther fast from Nov. 2–5” (we won’t try to assess the accuracy of her report; we are reluctant to ascribe credibility to anything she says). Her output has otherwise appeared in WND, Charisma Magazine, The Elijah List and similar deranged conspiracy outlets.

 

Politically, Hardin is MAGA, and she was no fan of the Biden administration; in 2021, for instance, she warned that a new Holocaust was “being ushered in by the Biden administration which will affect every American personally.” Meanwhile, she imagines that Trump is a proper spokesperson for God; in 2019, for instance, she reported from the National Prayer Breakfast that Trump’s “spiritual growth” was obvious: Trump “shared several scriptures and they flowed out of him not as from a speech, but from the heart. He was familiar with them. He knew them.” Her conclusion is, in other words, based exclusively on what she wishes were the case. Otherwise, Hardin is an incessant spreader of conspiracy theories, and has for instance asserted that the January 6, 2021 Capitol storming was a false flag event carried out by Antifa and BLM.

 

An although she believes in the power and accuracy of prophecies, she has an escape hatch for when they fail: many “prophetic words are contingent upon the follow-through action of the recipient. If we don’t receive the word and act upon it, then it remains unfulfilled. It’s not that the prophetic word was off. It’s that the recipient did nothing to partner with the word to bring it to pass.” In other words, if the prophecy didn’t come to pass, the blame belongs on people who didn’t do their part, so you’ll never, in fact, find an example of a false prophecy.

 

Diagnosis: Fully unmoored from reality and floating freely in a fantasy realm characterized by fundie rage and paranoia. Don’t listen to anything she says.


Thursday, January 29, 2026

#2978: Bill Hardiman

William Clyde Hardiman III was the mayor of Kentwood, Michigan from 1992 to 2002, subsequently a state senator from 2003 to 2011, and an unsuccessful Congressional candidate in 2011. This is, in other words, somewhat antiquated stuff, but we deem it to be still worth mentioning, albeit briefly. Hardiman’s stint in the state senate was characterized by backing a number of bills promoting intelligent design creationism and, in particular, teaching intelligent design creationism in public schools, such as a 2008 bill that would open up for teaching “alternative views on evolution, global warming and cloning. Hardiman, the lead sponsor of the senate version of the bill, said he was inspired by the ‘documentary’ Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, which is approximately on the level of referring to a Jack Chick comic.

 

Diagnosis: Fool. At present hopefully out of any group with any power to influence these matters.

 

Monday, January 26, 2026

#2977: William Happer

William Happer is the Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics, emeritus, at Princeton University and an internationally recognized expert on atomic physics, optics and spectroscopy. He is most famous, however, for his views on climate change, a topic that is emphatically not within his area of expertise. Happer, who not a climate scientist, rejects the scientific consensus on climate change and has, indeed and obviously without knowing what he is talking about, become one of the big authorities in the climate denialist movement. In 2018, then-president Trump therefore appointed him to the National Security Council to counter evidence linking carbon dioxide emissions to global warming – and as opposed to some of Trump’s appointees who admitted that scientific consensus had a strong case, Happer stayed true to dogmatic denialism throughout his tenure. There is a detailed breakdown of Happer’s antics on the council here. He resigned from the council in 2019, partially, it seems, because the council didn’t go as far along with his denialism as he wanted.

 

Happer is also co-founder and board member of the well-funded astroturf advocacy group  the CO2 Coalition, which was established in 2015 to “educate the public that increased atmospheric levels of CO2 will benefit the world”. He is also an “adjunct scholar” at the Cato Institute, on the academic advisory council of the British Global Warming Policy Foundation, and a member of Climate Exit (Clexit), a group formed shortly after the Brexit decision based on the idea that[t]he world must abandon this suicidal Global Warming crusade.”

 

Happer’s position is that climate change was invented by “paranoid” scientists – Happer dismisses climate scientists as a “glassy-eyed” “cult” – and is a “completely imaginary threat that doesn’t exist. People are afraid to stand up and say that.” More specifically, he thinks thatthe warming will be small compared to the natural fluctuations in the earth’s temperature, and that the warming and increased CO2 will be good for mankind”, which is a conjunction with two false conjuncts. The latter, however, is something of a main schtick for Happer; CO2 is plant food, and “from the point of view of geological history, we are in a CO2 famine”, which is not only inaccurate but even if it were accurate, utterly irrelevant since it sort of neglects the small point that sea levels were also typically “100s of feet higher during [e.g.] the Phanerozoic”. To Happer, however, the important point is to “counter this myth that CO2 is a dangerous pollutant. It’s not a pollutant at all”; rather “[a]lmost all plants grow better and are more drought resistant with two to four times more CO2 than now” (“[i]f plants could vote, they would vote for coal,” says Happer). Apparently, he considers it something of a gotcha trick against climate scientists to ask “is CO2 a pollutant or a vital molecule for life onEarth”, just like how “is poop a vital organic fertilizer for plants or is it bad to eat” would be a gotcha for other medical doctors. In 2014, Happer said that the “demonization of carbon dioxide is just like the demonization of the poor Jews under Hitler”, which is a strikingly silly thing to say on a striking number of levels.

 

And William Happer is a an obvious confused and silly person, who really, really doesn’t even remotely grasp the essentials of the issue he is going all denialist about (he does, for some reason, complain that people who call him a denier are trying to make him “look like a Nazi sympathizer”) and staunchly refuses to consult introductory textbooks that would explain them. That, of course, hardly matters to denialist organizations that frequently cite him and invoke him as some kind of authority he clearly isn’t. Here is a fair response to some of his denialist PRATTs from someone who does have some understanding of what it is all about.

 

According to himself, Happer arrived at his beliefs about climate change during his experience at the Department of Energy back in the age of Bush the elder (he was dismissed in 1993 over disagreements concerning the ozone layer); at least he has been in the game for a while – he was for instance coauthor of petition to change the official position of the American Physical Society to a version that raised doubts about global warming in 2009, which was overwhelmingly rejected by the APS Council – and has no intention of letting scientific evidence affect his firmly entrenched commitments.

 

Diagnosis: Happer has been accurately described as “a fringe figure even for climate sceptics”, and he really has no idea what he is talking about. But he nevertheless talks about it with confidence, and has, due to his credentials in other fields, established himself as a frighteningly powerful authority figure in the denialist movement.

 

Hat-tip: Desmog


Friday, January 23, 2026

#2976: Dan Happel

Dan Happel is a Montana-based speaker, self-declared political analyst, and radio host at Connecting the Dots with Dan Happel on Patriot Soapbox. Yes, as the name of his radio program suggests, Dan Happel is a conspiracy theorist. It is worth mentioning that he was also a delegate to the 2016 Republican National Convention and member of the Ted Cruz 2016 campaign’s Montana LeadershipTeam.

 

Happel is perhaps most famous for his promotion of Agenda 21 conspiracy theories, and he believes that Agenda 21 – a several decades old, nonbinding sustainable development initiative from the UN – is actually a Stalinist plot to create a one-world government to ensure that “private property can be increasingly controlled and ultimately eliminated” because that’s what the superrich really want. In particular, according to Happel, Agenda 21 will “involve relocating most Montanans to some large city, like Seattle, where they would be housed like sardines in compact housing developments, deprived of automobiles, and basically held hostage to some job in the city. Meanwhile vast areas of land would be reclaimed for wilderness to be used by the rich oligarchy.” And you should be worried, for as Happel sees it – completely falsely – Agenda 21 (at least prior to Trump) “drives 90 percent of federal legislation”.

 

But Happel might not be a mere one-trick pony, however. During COVID, he was one of the most influential pushers of COVID-related misinformation in Montana, and in September 2021 he was chair of the “second annual Red Pill Expo” in Rapid City devoted mostly (but not exclusively) to COVID-related conspiracy theories: “We’re going to be talking about the vaccine programs and what the vaccine programs are about,” said Happel about the event. “We’re going to be talking about COVID, we're going to be talking about Agenda 21. We're going to be talking about globalism and the push to create a one world global government” so ok, he is a one-trick pony. But he is also anti-vaccine; as he lays it out in his post “VACCINE HESITANCY aka COMMON SENSE!”, “not only were these ‘vaccines’ [the COVID ones] not adequately tested, they became a political football to outlaw the use of inexpensive, time tested and verifiably safer drugs like hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin.”

 

Diagnosis: Although his Red Pill Expo was nominally arranged to “help truth seekers understand how the world really works,” Happel is evidently among the worst possible guides you could have. He has an audience, but we doubt he has much power to win new converts.


Wednesday, January 21, 2026

#2975: Jim Hanson

Jim Hanson is a deranged conspiracy theorist affiliated with the anti-Islam organization Center for Security Policy. And Hanson sees Muslim and and pro-Muslim conspiracies everywhere. For instance, when a 14-year-old Muslim was arrested in Texas for bringing a homemade clock to school back in 2015 under the pretext that it might be a bomb, Hanson saw through the pretense immediately and concluded that everything about the situation “was a P.R. stunt, it was a staged event” designed by Islamic radicals for the purpose of undermining anti-terrorism security protocols. “They wanted people to react and they wanted to portray this kid as an innocent victim ... I don’t think there is any question he was put up to it by someone else who wanted him to take that in to create this exact scenario”. Evidence, you ask? Hah, you narrow-minded heretic. No, Hanson knows: this whole thing was organized by Islamic fundamentalists who “want a Muslim-privilege exemption to ‘see something, say something' and that's what this is about” (he also refused to believe that the clock was, in fact, just a clock). Meanwhile, Hanson and his organization has long been pushing the conspiracy theory that Democrats are purposely bringing in immigrants who “don’t share our culture and values” in order to seize power and undermine America. And keep in mind that the organization’s ‘research’ into such issues has been invoked e.g. by American presidents (name not necessary) to propose policies like a ban on Muslim immigration.

 

Diagnosis: And that’s enough about Jim Hanson. Please overlook him, his rants and his organization. Many, unfortunately, don’t.


Monday, January 19, 2026

#2974: Paul J. Hansen

Paul J. Hansen is a flamboyantly lunatic sovereign citizen (self-proclaimed) who has made a bit of a career offering legal advice and selling legal “kits” to other sovereign citizen types and people in trouble with the law. Despite admitting to being a “native-born of the Land of Nebraska” and living in Omaha, Hansen “believes that neither the city nor Douglas County holds sway over him” and “does not believe the laws of the United States of America apply to him”; he does, accordingly, for instance refuse to pay taxes. On the other hand, he does sell “briefs” on his website to people who don’t want to get a driver’s license or license plate, or who do not want to observe public health codes or pay taxes. His followers tend to claim that his legal reasoning is sound because they have no training in or idea about how the law works, and preditably tend to neglect the probably rather more pressing question “will it fly?” And to answer the latter, it is worth noting that Hansen has outstanding warrants for his arrest for failing to appear in court, tax liens for tens of thousands of dollars, and been arrested a two-digit number of times. Over the course of his career, Hansen has made news for instance for taking money from a disabled person and for being sentenced to jail for refusing to address 14 housing code violations as well asone count of giving false information, one count of resisting arrest and two counts of obstructing the administration of the law.”

 

Hansen is, however, most famous for his work on behalf of legendary loon Kent Hovind. After having landed himself in jail for tax fraud, Hovind – who had long promoted sovereign citizen theories himselfsought the legal counsel of Hansen. The WND described Hansen as “an attorney advising Hovind”; Hansen, however, is not a lawyer but, according to himself, a “law-educated layman”; indeed, the courts issued an injunction in 2013 preventing Hansen from “engaging in the unauthorized practice of law in any manner, including but not limited to holding himself out to another as being entitled to practice law as defined by § 3-1001” after an investigation of Hansen's blogs and legal “kits”. A fairly representative example of Hansen’s work on Hovind’s behalf is his 2011 letter to the Florida Attorney General informing the government that Hovind is a “free inhabitant” per the Articles of Confederation and the government “must accept the Articles of Confederation” – i.e., Hansen based his argument on a system of governance that dissolved itself in 1789. That Hovind would buy such bullshit is hardly surprising. The courts emphatically didn’t.

 

Apparently, Hovind’s and Hansen’s partnership has continued also after Hovind finally got out of jail, and they have gone on to file frivolous lawsuits to be dismissed with prejudice based on hysterically insane pseudolaw.

 

Note that there is also a Paul Hansen who has published work with Answers in Genesis. We have no idea whether that is the same guy or not.

 

Diagnosis: Kent Hovind found his reasoning compelling enough to partner up with him, and that tells you all you need to know. And Paul Hansen is primarily a danger to himself and those who associate with him. That said, there is a scary amount of these dingbats to go around.

 

Hat-tip: Rationalwiki