Here is another slimy, dishonest creationist and liar for Jesus. Cordova's style is well exemplified here.He is neither the most influential nor the stupidest of the creationists, but he is probably the most vile and dishonest. He has absolutely no scruples concerning quote-mining, twisted misrepresentations and blatant, bald-faced lying to make a rhetorical point which might, at first, seem convincing to the ignorant. Another example is this one.
Cordova teaches at the George Mason University and is a firm Bill Dembski acolyte and disciple (writes on Dembski’s blog, which I will not link). Apparently he really thinks that he has come up with challenges to evolution that scientists cannot manage/don’t dare to try to answer.
Of course, Cordova does not even begin to have the background to do biology, but what’s more, he doesn’t even have the slightest idea about what constitutes scientific inquiry or how to distinguished good arguments from fallacies. Here are some further examples.
And here, Cordova's associate Tim McGrew comes clean as a dishonest idiot as well.
Cordova really doesn’t have a clue about anything even remotely related to science.
Diagnosis: Lunatic jerk. Liar for Jesus, crackpot and moron. Impact is probably negligible.
Impressive frequency of new posts at the moment. Keep up the good work :D
ReplyDeleteWill do!
ReplyDeleteAnd from the department of beyond idiocy. Indeed, there is more Cordova inanity here.
ReplyDeletei study biology and i think i have very strong evidence for design in nature
ReplyDeletea) we know that a self replicate robot that made from dna need a designer
b) from a material prespective the ape is a self replicate robot
a+b= the ape need a designer
or even a self replicat watch.the evolutionist always says that a watch need a designer because it cant self rplicat. so if we will find a self replicat watch we need to say that is made by itself
scientist even find a motor in bacteria called bacterial flagellum:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-j5kKSk_6U
plus: if a self replicate car cant evolve into an airplan, how can a bacteria can evolve into human ?
the evolution say that small steps for milions years become a big steps. but according to this a lots of small steps in self replicat car (with dna) will evolve into a airplan.
but there is no step wise from car to airplan
evolution say that common similarity is evidence for common descent. but according to this 2 similar self replicat car are evolve from each other
check this site
http://creation.com/
It is my information that Slimy Sal is no longer at George Mason but has move on and is attending graduate school, possibly in Delaware.
ReplyDeleteLinks are all broken.
ReplyDeleteAbiogenesis is garbage!
ReplyDeleteIf Chemsits produce life in the lab all it will prove is a highly manipulated controlled environment that has no relevance to the natural world.
The hand of the intelligent chemist is at every step of the experiment!
If campers have to start camp fires purposefully that proves that it requires intelligence and that fires can't start spontaneously and naturally
DeleteNone of the links work?
ReplyDelete