Like intelligent design creationists there are plenty of
groups of weird kooks on the Internet who lament the fact that their particular
brand of alternatives to mainstream science (i.e. anti-science) isn’t taken
seriously or e.g. given equal time in public schools. “Teach the controversy,”
is the common battle cry, and for Rick DeLano, the really controversial idea is
heliocentrism, which he rejects. He has even produced a documentary on the
subject, “The Principle”,
in which he interviewed several real scientists and clipped it to make it
appear as if modern cosmology is in trouble and that his completely ridiculous delusion
is somehow respectable and taken seriously even by people like Lawrence Krauss,
who was interviewed but, uh, expressed dissatisfaction with the editing.
DeLano also, famously, got Kate Mulgrew to narrate it, though according to her
he was not particularly forthcoming with what claim the documentary was going
to promote.
The documentary is based on the views of Robert Sungenis,
and DeLano proudly admits to never having finished high school or had any
relevant education – so he is certainly not corrupted by the status quo. Like
all anti-science fanatics, DeLano readily admits that “I have great respect for
science.” However, “[w]here I become offended is when people ignore the
evidence,” which is an interesting statement given the approach he takes in his
documentary. “They haven’t proven that something can come from nothing,” argues
DeLano, which … isn’t particularly relevant to anything whatsoever. And science
refuses to consider the evidence because science is an atheistic conspiracy to undermine the Bible. So much for loving it.
Some examples of DeLano’s understanding of science can be
found here.
NASA, by the way, has conspicuously removed material from their website that suggest
geocentrism, it seems, so neither DeLano nor you will find any such material there – which is apparently evidence that
there must be a conspiracy and that geocentrism is correct.
The WND promoted the “documentary”, of course (their review by Drew Zahn, who knows as little
about science as DeLano, is discussed here).
Diagnosis:
Village idiot. Even committed creationists seem very reluctant to take DeLano
seriously (which tells you a bit about how radically fringe-idiotic the WND is, if you didn’t
already know). Probably pretty harmless in the grand scheme of things.
touch grass
ReplyDelete