#3001: Megan Heimer

A.k.a. Megan Redshaw [current name]

 

Megan Heimer is a naturopath and “wellness” blogger for a blog called Living Whole, a cesspit of woo, pseudoscience, conspiracy theories and – of course – antivaccine (https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Anti-vaccination_movement) lunacy. (In fact, there seems to be several blogs of that name, and the suspicion that a name like that shouldn’t inspire trust is flagrantly borne out by most of them.) Indeed, Heimer, whose credentials, according to herself, are “a degree in Political Science and [I] am an Attorney, Doctor of Naturopathy, Certified Natural Health Educator, Registered Power Yoga Instructor, writer, and stay-at-home mama,” rejects all medicines she deems non-“natural”, not just vaccines – her approach really has nothing to do with facts or (really) health at all but with fundamentalist adherence to a more trendy set of religious tenets that allow her to feel a very religious form of righteousness and nurture a cadre of acolytes who treat her various pronounciations as authoritative – but she is indeed most famous for her antivaccine activism. Note, by the way, that although naturopathic schools in general offer nothing more than pseudoeducation, Heimer’s diploma – on the basis of which she has called herself “Dr. Heimer” – is from Trinity College of Natural Health, which is a straight-up diploma mill and which is, for instance, on the list of institutions whose degrees are illegal to use in the State of Texas.

 

And Heimer will use – and has used – most antivaccine PRATTs in the antivaccine toolbox to push her case, including lying through her teeth. In her (viral) “rebuttal” to a very sensible article on antivaccine activists’ lies, Heimer for instance asserted that “the vaccine court has rule [sic] that evidence of a causal relationship between autism and MMR exists”; she didn’t provide any link or even reference to any such ruling, of course, because the assertion is a pretty obvious and easily checked lie. Relatedly, Heimer just stated, utterly falsely, that “vaccine inserts, and countless court cases have confirmed this link”. Again, of course, no such inserts or court cases (this one obviously doesn’t count) exist outside Heimer’s febrile imagination; indeed, court cases have quite clearly established the opposite conclusion (in an update to her post, she did, in fairness, provide one link to a vaccine court case she claimed “ruled that evidence of a causal relationship between autism and MMR exists” even though the court explicitly did not rule on the question of causation). Or in other words: Insofar as it is obvious even to her readers that Heimer herself has no background whatsoever in any field that would make her a credible authority on vaccines (and despite her stand that “it takes no credentials, no formal education, and no ‘M.D’ behind your name to take an educated stance on this issue”), she does at least recognize the need to invoke authoritative sources (also beyond other non-experts like Neil Z. Miller); so she just makes them up. And yes: it is, for all practical purposes, lying: We have no doubt Heimer believed her own claims when she wrote them, but the fact that she responded to commenters pointing out her errors not by addressing the criticisms or updating her post but by deleting the comments and blocking the commenters, demonstrates in abundance that honesty is not her strong suit.

 

We don’t, by the way, feel the need to comment on her apparently popular post “God Does Not Support Vaccines” (she is, of course, not the only one who has tried to make that case). Here, however, is a discussion of her Dunning-Kruger approach to Vitamin K shots for newborns, which synthesizes virtually every myth or piece of misinformation about Vitamin K shots and vaccines in general ever produced for the Internet and draws its conclusions on the ‘makes sense to me’ strategy and Heimer’s lack of knowledge or understanding of the issues she is discussing. Of course, as Heimer sees it, criticism of her misinformation, lies and quackery is hate speech, no less.

 

Her response to a CDC questionnaire that tells you what vaccines are recommended for people with chronic diseases (from back when the CDC were trustworthy on these issues) is telling: “First,” says Heimer, “vaccines don’t prevent chronic disease”, which is a rather typical response, given that the CDC was claiming no such thing but rather gave their recommendations based on the fact that patients with certain chronic diseases are more susceptible to complications from many vaccine-preventable disease. “Secondly,” says Heimer, “vaccines cause chronic disease. It’s written all over the package inserts, PubMed database, and thousands of peer-reviewed studies. (Don’t bother telling the CDC, they already know.)” Do you think she actually provides any sources? Can you guess why not? “Third, if you have a chronic disease, you’re more likely to suffer from a vaccine adverse reaction” (by which Heimer of course means mythical vaccine injuries). The possibly novel spin here, however, is Heimer’s conclusion that the CDC publishing information about vaccine recommendations for people with chronic diseases at all, is just a “sad attempt by the CDC to pit parent against parent. Nothing else works. We’re educated and we see through their lacking data, intentional cover-ups, and misleading propaganda, including their latest ploy at ‘scaring’ parents into vaccinating.” But as Heimer states, “it’s like we’re immune to bull$h*t”, and we believe that statement: no facts or evidence will sway Heimer for this has, for her, never been a question of facts or evidence.

 

As mentioned, Heimer runs through all the familiar antivaxx tropes and talking points, but she often has an even more unhinged take on them than even regular anti-vaccine ranters, for instance with regard to the myth of “aborted baby parts”, e.g. in her post “What You Didn’t Know About the Aborted Baby Parts in Your Vaccines” (yes, the post does list a good number of things you certainly didn’t know, for obvious reasons). Heimer is referring to vaccines made with fetal embryo fibroblast or retinal cells from cell lines derived (they replicate infinitely) from a few electively terminated pregnancies (abortions) in the 1960s to 80; there are, of course, no aborted baby parts or tissue in vaccines, but Heimer is deeply confused about that: “Have you read the CDC’s vaccine ingredient list? Why would they list aborted baby parts as ingredients if they weren’t actually in vaccines?” responds Heimer, assuming that her readers don’t check and realize that the CDC of course doesn’t list aborted fetal parts as ingredients because vaccines don’t contain them. But Heimer is not going to let facts and reason resolve a good confusion: “you might have also heard that only two babies were used and it was a really long time ago, which justifies the continued use of shooting up live babies with dead babies” (nope), but that, she concludes, “just simply isn’t true and if you think it is, watch one of the many Planned Parenthood videos. These people are harvesting baby parts for a reason,” imagines Heimer. And since aborted baby parts obviously can’t be an effective means to achieve immunity from disease, she concludes that CDC is relying on some form of dark magic: “Aborted baby is supposedly some sort of magic that makes vaccines more effective”. Nope, she doesn’t try. It’s not her style.

 

Source: Don't remember; please inform us.

Now, LivingWhole isn’t (or wasn’t) merely about vaccines, though: as mentioned above, Heimer rejects modern medicine in general, in favor of Modern Alternative Mama Kate Tietje’s crackpot Earthley products, claims that there is an ongoing war on homeopathy and that measles is no big deal (“This Mama Isn’t Scared of the Shmeasle Measles”); according to her blog, she and her family “do not use any chemical products in our home or on our bodies”, they “believe in natural childbirth and had our last baby un-assisted at home” and they “home school”, something that, given her relationship with facts and knowledge, is a tragedy. Indeed, to many people, she is probably most famous for the brouhaha around her attempt to adopt two children from DRC, a story that, even if you trusted to her own descriptions doesn’t exactly portray her in a very sympathetic light.

 

And though she was most famous some years ago, when the adoption story was ongoing, it’s not like she’s gone. Here is a discussion of her 2025 post (“Why You Shouldn’t Be Scared of Measles”) about recent measles outbreaks. In the post, Heimer – now Redshaw – manages to get every claim wrong, and usually even in ways that can be easily checked if her readers bother, from the claim that among the people needing hospital care in the recent Texas outbreak “nearly half were fully vaccinated” (they were, in fact, all unvaccinated; nearly’ is doing some heavy lifting in Heimer’s claim), through misinformation about shedding, to her claim that alarmism about measles is unwarranted since, even though even she has to admit that people die, more people die from falling and she doesn’t see fearmongering about “staircases” or “sidewalks”. Maybe we’re completely off about American culture here, but we do have the impression that people constructing staircases and sidewalks, and not the least parents of small children, do have some concerns about the safety of staircases or sidewalks, and we are accordingly somewhat worried about Heimer’s execution of her role as a parent of small children. We are, as previously noted, not the only ones harboring such concerns.

 

For insights into Heimer’s lies, falsehoods and inaccuracies – at least up until ca. 2019 – this thread might be useful. Of particular note is Heimer’s own deployment of classical sockpuppetry.

 

Diagnosis: Paranoid, narcissistic and completely unhinged moron, and yes, we worry about the safety of both her and the people around her. Nonetheless, she seems to have a number of readers, and we worry about them, too.

 

Hat-tip: violentmetaphors

#3000: Pete Hegseth

Peter Brian Hegseth is a religious fundamentalist, wingnut, conspiracy theorist, author (American Crusade, The War on Warriors) former TV personality (e.g. Fox & Friends) and, currently and because we’re apparently living in the darkest timeline, the United States secretary of defense since 2025. As such, Hegseth is currently one of the most prominent threats to civilization the world is currently facing.

 

Already in his student days, Hegseth made his wingnut culture warrior credentials clear. As publisher of The Princeton Tory, Hegseth stated that he would “defend the pillars of Western civilization against the distractions of diversity” and claimed e.g. of The New York Times’ decision to print gay marriage announcements that it might just as well publish marriage announcements for incestuous, zoophilic, and pedophilic relationships (this is not merely ancient stuff: Hegseth has more recently also e.g. denounced TV shows portraying gay people as normal people as “evil,” “wicked,” “demonic,” and “a satanic Trojan Horse”). There is a decent resource on Hegseth’s background, including his work with Concerned Veterans for America, here.

 

During his stint at Fox and Friends, Hegseth had demonstrable influence on Trump 1. When Trump, in 2018, claimed that a migrant caravan traveling toward the US was infiltrated by “unknown Middle Easterners”, it was based on something Hegseth had made up; similarly, Trump repeated Hegseth’s attempt to correlate video games with mass shootings in 2019 based on nothing but a wish to draw attention away from the role of guns.

 

More importantly, Hegseth has served as secretary of defense since January 2025. Others have covered his tenure as secretary of defense comprehensively, including his attempts to get rid of critics (particularly notable are, perhaps, his frivolous legal campaigns against Mark Kelly and, not the least, this situation), to bring the military more effectively under the control of Trump’s whims, and to ban educational materials that don’t promote his own ideological stances; we’ll not go into detail on these issues here. His general level of competence – which was perhaps well illustrated by this situation early in his tenure, and remember that Hegseth was pretty vocal back in 2016 about Hilary Clinton’s “recklessness” with e-mails and recommended job firings and potential criminal charges) – and its significance is discussed e.g. here and here. At least his efforts to punish media over what he deems ‘unflattering’ photographs display petty snowflake dictator proclivities in full. His use of advice from and promotion of conspiracy theorists like pizzagate champion Jack Posobiec is worth a mention as well. And of course, he is arguably a murderer and warcriminal.

 

Fundie insanity

Hegseth is a religious fundamentalist and Christian nationalist with close ties to the Pilgrim Hill Reformed Fellowship, which is a congregation in the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches (CREC). Pilgrim Hill’s pastor Brooks Potteiger is Hegseth’s closest spiritual adviser, and Hegseth has a close relationship with Joshua Haymes, who runs the podcast the Reformation Red Pill podcast, which Hegseth has visited on numerous occasions. CREC, founded and led by Doug Wilson, promotes ‘sphere sovereignty’, that all aspects of human life, including the government, should be bound by biblical law as laid out in Old Testament precepts of ‘morality’ and punishment, as well as Postmillennialism, the view that Christians have a duty to ensure Christian domination of the world to facilitate the return of Christ. In particular, CREC promotes (e.g.) Christian nationalism, revoking women’s right to vote in the US, the idea that non-Christians and liberal Christians should not be allowed to hold public office in the US (or express their views in public), and capital punishment – potentially stoning – for adultery, abortion and homosexuality. Wilson and his followers understandably lauded Hegseth’s appointment as secretary of defense a major win for their ideology. At least one of Hegseth’s children is attending one of Doug Wilson’s ‘schools’.

 

Hegseth’s concern for how leftist ideology ruins kids goes behind educational concerns for his own offspring, of course. As a counterstrategy, Hegseth has suggested – e.g. at the CrossPolitic podcast hosted by Wilson-affiliates Toby Sumpter and Gabe Rench – creating a system of “classical Christian schools” himself to provide recruits for an underground army that will eventually launch an “educational insurgency” to take over the nation. Similar ideas were developed in his 2022 book Battle for the American Mind, which was coauthored with David Goodwin, president of Doug Wilson’s Association of Classical Christian Schools.

 

Indeed, Hegseth has himself explicitly endorsed the ideas of sphere sovereignty and promoted speeches by Doug Wilson e.g. arguing that women shouldn’t have the right to vote; people have also taken notice of his efforts to purge women from the military. Moreover, Hegseth has begun hosting monthly Christian prayer services during working hours at the Pentagon, using people like Potteiger and Wilson to lead them (from February 2026, they have also sent invitations to defense contractors, which have a particular motivation to participate and gain the advantage of face time with Pentagon officials that at least non-Christians and people with more integrity are barred from). The efforts have apparently had some effect: In the wake of the Iran attacks, military leaders told their service members that the war was “part of God’s divine plan”, that President Donald Trump was anointed by Jesus, and that the war would bring about the second coming of Jesus Christ. Those sentiments are certainly reflected by Hegseth himself, who has claimed that soldiers fight for the US because they believe in Jesus (and “the willingness to make sacrifices on behalf of one’s country is born in one thing: a deep and abiding belief in God’s love for us and his promise of eternal life”) and that they gain salvation for dying for a “Christian nation”.

 

And yes, Hegseth is, indeed, a Christian nationalist, as laid out e.g. in his 2020 book American Crusade (reviewed here). In the book, Hegseth defined “Americanism” as opposition to feminism, globalism, Marxism, and progressivism, called democracy a leftist (hence non-Americanist) demand, and described those with a different political bent than himself as enemies of freedom (however he defines “freedom”), the United States, and the Constitution, which he evidently has his own interpretation of. A victory for America, according to Hegseth, involves the end of globalism, socialism, secularism, environmentalism, Islamism (a central theme of the book central the destruction of Muslim holy sites in order to reclaim them for Christianity), “genderism”, and leftism. Note also that Hegseth has for a while (e.g. in his book The War on Warriors) complained against measures to prevent far-right militia members and white supremacists from gaining positions of power in the military; there is an ok essay on some of Hegseth’s ideas for the military here.

 

General wingnuttery and conspiracy theories

Hegseth was, of course, also a vigorous spreader of ridiculous 2020 election fraud conspiracy theories, and was a central promoter of the conspiracy theory that Antifa was involved in the January 2021 attack: he claimed to have seen evidence firsthand that Antifa members disguised themselves as Trump supporters, but when pressed, appeared to retreat to “reports” and ultimately that he didn’t need more evidence than his “common sense”.

 

Not the least, Hegseth has described climate change as nothing but an attempt at government control. In March 2025, he accordingly canceled climate change studies, decried climate change as “crap” on social media, and sought to eliminate climate planning from the Department of Defense – though he included an exception for extreme weather preparation, which would more than suggest that he was pretty aware that he was merely posturing for dimwitted fans was it not for the overwhelming evidence that he is a lunatic moron.

 

His general view of matters related to science and reality is well illustrated by the pride he takes in not having washed his hands in over ten years. Hegseth’s reason for not washing his hands is that Hegseth doesn’t believe that germs exist. If Hegseth cannot see them, he says, they are not real, unlike Antifa at Trump rallies or demons.

 

Diagnosis: One of the greatest and most immediate threats to human life, welfare or civilization the world has to offer at present, of course, and the kind of person no-one with a minimum of both wits and decency would let near any kind of situation where he could possibly exert any kind of power or influence over anything. We do not live in a world where wits or decency carry much weight, however.

 

#2999: Jake Hebert

Jake Hebert ostensibly has a Ph.D. in Physics from the University of Texas at Dallas, but he is also a “Research Associate” for the Institute for Creation Research (ICR), so his current view of and relationship with science is, at best, complicated. Yes, Hebert is a young-earth creationist, and will do his desperate utmost to shoehorn observations that really, really don’t fit into his worldview (of course, the vast majority of the observations refuting his view he will just disregard) and use any gap in current scientific understanding – indeed, even the fact that scientists are still testing hypotheses – as proof that “hey, scientists don’t know, therefore their theories are wrong and the Bible is correct” (indeed, that there is still research to do in a discipline apparently means that the whole discipline is “a scam”).

 

His comments on the New Horizons mission to Pluto are instructive in that regard. The fact that the mission was even launched is, to Hebert, “a tacit admission that they do not yet have in hand a plausible secular explanation for the solar system’s origin”; in other words because there are details yet to uncover, the scientists don’t know anything, and the well-established theories they have – and all the evidence for them – can be safely dismissed out of hand (together with all the evidence against a recent creation).

 

Indeed, one of the very purposes of the mission, to gather information about Kuiper belt objects (comets), is, as Hebert derangedly sees it, evidence that science is bunk and the universe is young. You see, “comets lose their mass so rapidly that no comets should exist at all today if the solar system really were billions of years old” … well, unless there was a supply of new ones, like the Oort cloud and the Kuiper belt. Hebert’s response? “The Oort Cloud is purely hypothetical” (it isn’t) and “Does the Kuiper Belt exist?” (yes). The mission to Pluto, then, is just a desperate attempt to disprove the youth of the solar system, and it will, as such, fail. Of course, in real life the Oort Cloud and the Kuiper Belt exist; and at some point, even the young-Earth creationists at the ICR will struggle to deny that just like creationists gave up on denying dinosaur. And it will of course not change anything; it’s not like people like Hebert are fazed by falsification. Here is a similar effort with regard to the Big Bang: Since there are unexplained details (like the maturity of distant galaxies), we can safely reject the whole thing. In fact, the Big Bang theory is also non-scientific: you see, scientists have a tendency to fill the gaps in their theories through research and have thus far been rather successful; to Hebert, that fact, that scientists find explanations for hitherto unexplained data, means that their theories are unfalsifiable and therefore unscientific. The theories are apparently also falsified. Yes, it’s a mess. “How much better to believe His testimony recorded in Genesis than to trust the speculative, ever-changing stories of those determined to deny our Creator!” asks Hebert.

 

That said, Hebert does think theology is absolutely essential to science. We’ll leave it to readers to assess his arguments (here).

 

But given his background, you’d think that Hebert would at least employ slightly more sophisticated gambits in his attacks on the theory of evolution? According to Hebert, “evolutionary doctrine” is “not genuine science” insofar as “[t]here is no empirical evidence that life can come from non-life, or that an organism can change into a fundamentally different kind of organism”. So nope; unless he’s lying, Hebert’s grasp of the theory of evolution is at the level of your average creationist youtube troll. This one is pretty striking, too. Here is a discussion of Hebert’s response to the obvious observation that creationism is really a kind of conspiracy theory; that observation is, as Hebert sees it, a pure ad hominem attack – besides, evolution is racist and communist and a lie that originates, like all lies, with Satan himself. So there. Also, “the creation-Flood model of the Ice Age is vastly superior to anything proposed by the Creator-denying scientists” because it just is, regardless of the evidence.

 

Hebert’s own attempts at research are published in things like Answers in Genesis’s house journal Answers (see e.g. this and this), which use … different standards than ordinary scientific journals.

 

Diagnosis: Aggressively insane fundie. He’s got credentials, and since creationism has a somewhat desperate shortage of people with genuine credentials, he’s quickly risen in their ranks. One genuinely wonders whether the ICR would have preferred that he stayed silent and just brandished those credentials, though; then again, it’s not like it’s people who know anything whatsoever about science that constitute their target audience.

 

#2998: Gary Heavin

Gary Heavin is the Texas-based founder of the fitness chain Curves International, a conspiracy theorist, a raving fundie lunatic and in general most of the things that are wrong with the world. Heavin is the author of a number of books (like Curves: Permanent Results Without Permanent Dieting and Curves On the Go) and his fitness chain was at one point the largest fitness chain in the world. More recently, Heavin and his wife Diane have been producing wingnut and fundamentalist films, including Mission Air (2013) and the 2016 action adventure film Amerigeddon (written by Heavin and Chase Hunter and directed by Mike Norris) about a takeover of the US by a UN/globalist-supported terrorist organization, which is about as subtle in its political commentary as you can imagine: it is basically a breathless summary of a wingnut conspiracy theorist’s fever dreams, in which the characters are simple mouthpieces for the views these conspiracy theorists have themselves (the good guys) and those they imagine anyone who disagrees with them really have (the villains), and the movie has been aptly described as “your drunk uncle rambling at a Christmas party as he wears a tinfoil hat” as it covers everything from crisis actors to one-world government fantasies (yes, Alex Jones was indeed involved in the movie because of course he was); it’s got anti-GMO messaging, too.

 

And note, not the least, how prominently Amerigeddon proudly displays its endorsement by the Oath Keepers – Heavin apparently enjoys something of a deep affiliation with that group, having for instance reportedly donated significant sums of money to them. As for the contents of the movie itself, Heavin views it as something akin to an educational film, writing at the time (2016) that a “shadow government” that worships Satan was using then-President Obama as a “puppet” to further its interests through “anti-American policies” like “the open border, the import of un-vetted Syrians, the decimation of our armed forces and the financial bankrupting of our country”, policies that “can best be explained by understanding the true intent of the globalists running our country”; the movie apparently provides that explanation. And apparently those elites aren’t, ultimately, human: According to Heavin (on InfoWars – Heavin was for a time a mainstay on the show), the Nephilim still roam the earth today and are actually demons, and although God has been trying to “cleanse the DNA” from humanity by destroying these entities, libruls of the deep state work hard to preserve their demonic bloodlines by judicious intermarriages. Among the worst representatives of the demonic deep state are, of course, the Clintons, which is “a machine that has a trail of bodies as far as you can see” – everyone who dares stand up to them should fear for their lives.

 

As such, the 2016 election did, of course, have a significance far beyond what you’d immediately think; according to Heavin, the election represented a “great battle” between globalism and nationalism, as foreseen in the Bible, “and this globalism the Bible predicts is going to happen,” it is “going to be led by the Antichrist himself. You know, you’re going to have to take the Mark of the Beast to buy or sell.” As for the mark itself, Heavin (with Alex Jones) of course tied it to Apple CEO Tim Cook’s discussion of a cashless society and how the Apple logo, in their feverish imaginations, represent the apple that Eve ate in the Garden of Eden. Whether the subsequent election results falsified a Biblical prophecy is unclear, but conspiracy theorists are not deterred by contradictions.

 

And although Trump apparently put in a brave effort to combat the deep state during his first presidency, he was up against a formidable foe. Indeed, as Heavin sees it, the whole COVID-19 pandemic was a weaponized virus created by “the powers that be in this country who want to destroy Trump’s presidency” (its effects on the rest of the world was just collateral damage). It is worth (or whatever you call it) quoting Heavin in some detail here:

 

“We know that it’s a weaponized virus because we see the RNA strands that were put into this virus from HIV, from MERS, and from the SARS virus [no, he does, for obvious reasons, not mention his sources]. There’s no way this could have happened in nature. So somebody built it, there’s no question about that. The question is who did, and who unleashed this on the world. I’m afraid that the powers that be in this country who want to destroy Trump’s presidency, who want to eliminate China’s threat to our hegemony – and by the way, there is a byproduct of this which is a depopulation effort. We’re going to end up providing some solution to our Social Security elderly problem. This sounds terrible, but this collateral damage to the American people, I believe was a desirable byproduct for the people that are in power”

 

Apparently even Texas Governor Greg Abbott lent an ear to Heavin and his ramblings, though it should be noted that Heavin was apparently not completely satisfied with just meeting Abbott, for according to Heavin, he was “trying to get to Trump to make him aware that this is not a nonevent. This is a very nefarious act against him”. Meanwhile, Heavin’s own promotion of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID was published by NaturalNews, who, on their side, presented Heavin as something of an expert on the issue mostly because he said what they wanted to hear but also because Heavin runs a gym and claims that he had “talked to doctors”.

 

Heavin is, of course, also a 9/11 truther –although he is officially just JAQing off – having promoted a number of false claims about the terrorist attacks, including the claim that no plane wreckage was found at the Pentagon and the claim that Building 7 was brought down by a controlled demolition. But of course, the ample evidence that Heavin’s nonsense is, indeed, nonsense doesn’t count for much to Heavin himself; Heavin’s got a different source for his evidence: according to Heavin, God Himself revealed to him the truth about 9/11 –and although he is aware that critics who care about facts dismiss his claims, he also notes that “ridicule is a strategy of the Enemy”, so the fact that he is criticized and his claims refuted is itself evidence that he is right. And once again, the real culprits behind 9/11 is the secretive and powerful “shadow government” that controls the world, “that wants us to die to have a diminished population,” and which is “setting us up for disaster”; Heavin knows this because he has “sensed that people that are in positions of influence” don’t care about or like Americans and that they support the creation of “a one world government.” Also immigration, of course, which is a deliberate government plot to incite unrest. And so on.

 

Diagnosis: We suppose Heavin will take this post as evidence that we’re the Enemy, but it’s hard not to ridicule someone as ridiculous as Gary Heavin. But he does have some influence, apparently, and America has learned the hard way not to dismiss angry clowns just because they are confused, incoherent or silly.

 

#2997: Jeff Hays

Antivaxxers struggle to publish in serious research journals – for obvious reasons, insofar as evidence, reality, accountability and facts are all stacked against them. So instead of trying to do research or scientific studies, which – unless care is taken to avoid proper methodology or interpretation of data – would not give them what they want, they tend to make documentaries (at least when they don’t successfully take over and undermine government organizations). Del Bigtree’s Vaxxed may be the most famous, followed, perhaps, by conspiracy flicks like The Greater Good and The Truth About Vaccines, but antivaxxers have been in the game for a while.

 

The 2016 movie Bought: Your Health Now Brought to You by Wall Street, for instance, which was produced by Jeff Hays, directed by Bobby Sheehan, and backed by Age of Autism (and promoted e.g. by Mike Adams at NaturalNews) promised to “uncover the hidden facts about vaccinations” and was, as expected, mostly an exercise in Big Pharma conspiracy theories. And it featured “exclusive interviews” with the same lineup of antivaxx conspiracy theorists exclusively featured in every single one of these movies (here called “the world’s most acclaimed experts in research, medicine, holistic care and natural health”), including Sherri Tenpenny, Andrew Wakefield, Kelly Brogan and Toni Bark, spewing precisely the same misinformation and conspiracy theories they spew in all the other movies. The movie is otherwise crammed with an impressive amount of debunked misinformation, including the claim that vaccines are ineffective but do cause autism – an idea so thoroughly debunked that it categorizes with flat eartherism in terms of connection with evidence and reality – but is especially notable for its persecution fantasies and its attempts to link vaccine denialism with GMO paranoia. There is, of course, no science or evidence involved, which we suppose Hays and his gaggle of loons just take to show how effective Wall Street is at covering things up and as further evidence for a conspiracy.

 

In 2017, Hays followed up his documentary with producing the 10-episode series Vaccines Revealed, another “parade of well-known and thoroughly debunked anti-vaccinationists, in some cases being interviewed by other anti-vaccinationists, produced by someone whose past work has promoted anti-vaccination views” – the first episode lets Andrew Wakefield himself talk for more or less an hour and the third episode features RFK jr. giving “the long version” (over an hour) of his antivaccine conspiracy theories – and which was in heavily promoted (courtesy of chiropractor and insane antivaccine conspiracy theorist Patrick Gentempo) at the International Chiropractors Association (ICA) Council on Chiropractic Pediatrics Annual Conference, a group that has, like chiropractors in general, a long history of promoting antivaccine misinformation (yes, even mainstream media has noticed). Hays has, in fact, had a long and fruitful relationship with chiropractors, having earlier produced Doctored, a conspiracy flick attacking the American Medical Association for being critical of chiropractors (as well as promoting various chiropractic woo and pseudoscience), and Undoctored, which appears to be more of the same.

 

And in 2022, Hays was back, this time with the conspiracy flick The Real Anthony Fauci a full-length feature documentary based on RFK’s book of the same name and hence promoting e.g. RFK’s conspiracy theories about Fauci as a stooge for Big Pharma and RFK’s recommendations of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin as potential Covid treatments. Apparently, Robert Malone is a fan.

 

Hays himself has in fact produced cheap and mostly conspiracy-themed documentaries on a number of topics, starting with his breakthrough FahrenHYPE 9/11 in 2004 and including for instance produced a documentary with Ben Greenfield. The aforementioned Vaccines Revealed is, in fact, part of a series of documentaries Hays has done with Gentempo, which include titles like Money Revealed, Crypto Revealed, End Game, GMOs Revealed and Psychedelics Revealed.

 

Diagnosis: A product of the developments in the mid-2000s, when improved technology allowed anyone to quickly and affordably create movies that could pollute and clog up the information stream, it is not always entirely clear whether Hays is a true believer or just producing whatever crap anyone is willing to pay for. Whatever the case may be, he is currently a major producer of conspiracy theory bullshit and a significant malicious tumor on the back of civilization. 

 

#2996: Alan Hays & Ray Pilon

Alan Hays

Although both Dixon Alan Hays and Ray Pilon have individually done and said plenty of stupid shit, they’ve been collaborating on silliness in a way that makes it seem apt to cover them both in a single entry (we don’t fear running out potential entries anytime soon). In any case: Alan Hays is a dentist and currently supervisor of elections in Lake County, Florida, since 2017, after having served in the Florida Senate from 2010 to 2016 and in the Florida House of Representatives from 2004 to 2010. Ray Pilon, meanwhile, served in the Florida House of Representatives from 2010 to 2016 representing first the 69^th district and then the 72nd District.

 

Ray Pilon

Hays and Pilon are both creationists and have fought hard to get creationism taught in Florida public schools. In 2016, for instance, they were behind House Bill 899 and the identical Senate Bill 1018, which would ostensibly empower taxpayers to object to specific instructional materials used in public schools, e.g. on the grounds that they fail to provide “a noninflammatory, objective, and balanced viewpoint on issues.” The bills, which also required schools to provide “[a] thorough presentation and critical analysis of the scientific theory of evolution”, were designed by the Florida Citizens’ Alliance and Better Collier County Public Schools as a response to being annyoyed that public schools have been using e.g. a world history textbook in which  “Darwin’s conclusions [are] presented as fact and the biblical theory as ludicrous … [and which] states as fact millions of species exist and fossil records document changes over time” and an American history textbook that is “permeate[d]” by “discussion of climate change.”

 

Those bills failed in 2016, but an equivalent bill, HB 989, succeeded in 2018, signifying, in many ways, the launch of Florida’s subsequent and ongoing war on education. And yes, it can legitimately be said that Hays and Pilon spearheaded the anti-education movement that groups like Moms for Liberty have later taken on a pan-American run.

 

And it wasn’t Hays’ first attempt. Back in 2008, when Hays – who is also the kind of guy who compares abortion to the Holocaust – belonged to the group around Ronda Storms, he sponsored an “academic freedom” bill inspired by Ben Stein’s conspiracy movie Expelled, claiming that “I want a balanced policy. I want students taught how to think, not what to think. There are problems with evolution. Have you ever seen a half-monkey, half human?” (No, he does of course no have the faintest clue about what the theory of evolution actually says.) In 2014, Hays also announced his intention to introduce a bill requiring that all Florida public school students in middle or high school watch Dinesh D’Souza’s film America because he liked it. 

 

Pilon, on his side, is probably most famous for his attempts to push plans to rig elections to ascertain that his side wins, using means that have been more or less normalized at present.

 

Diagnosis: That these insane morons seem almost milquetoast by today’s standards tell you way more about today than it tells you about them. Deranged lunatics, both.

 

#2995: Joshua Haymes

Joshua K. Haymes is a conspiracy theorist, podcaster, manosphere prophet, pastor, violently unhinged fundamentalist, and a living parody of the unholy alliance between fuming Taliban-style fundamentalism and contemporary groyperism. He currently works fulltime as a podcaster (the Reformation Red Pill podcast), but used to be co-pastor of SOMA Venice and a pastoral intern at Pilgrim Hill Reformed Fellowship, a congregation in the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches (CoREC). As such, he is most famous for being pastor for US defense secretary Pete Hegseth, a fact he doesn’t exactly tend to shut up about, and which explains a lot in the scariest possible way.

 

Indeed, the relationship between Haymes and Hegseth is a close one: Haymes’s podcast cohost is Brooks Potteiger, the pastor at Pilgrim Hill and Hegseth’s closest spiritual adviser, and Hegseth has appeared on the podcast numerous times. Haymes, meanwhile, thinks that Democrats and the media hate Pete Hegseth because he is “a straight, white, Christian man” who is preventing them from establishing their “gay race commie utopia.”

 

CoREC core tenets and Christian nationalism

CoREC (yes, we have written about Doug Wilson before but admit that his rise to prominence the last couple of years might warrant an updated entry) endorses the doctrine of “sphere sovereignty”, which encompasses the idea that all aspects of human life, including government, is or should be bound by a vision of biblical law that aligns with Old Testament precepts of ‘morality’ and punishment.

 

CoREC also endorses Postmillennialism, the view that Christ will return after Christian domination of the world is achieved, an idea that is – obviously – a major motivator for Christian nationalism movements that wish to transform society through religious and political means and think that any opposition to Christian nationalism is guided by Satan. Haymes himself is officially fighting to impose Christian nationalism on the nation “because if we don’t win politically and spiritually, then my great-grandchildren will be very likely imprisoned for saying the kinds of things that we [believe].” The prediction is of course merely a projection of his own preferences for how those who have different beliefs from himself should be treated.

 

Haymes is a devoted subscriber to the Great Replacement conspiracy theory and believes that e.g. Democrats (Satanists) are deliberately working to replace Americans with Muslims to prevent the return of Christ: “make no mistake,” says Haymes, “mass immigration is designed by liberal globalists to destroy, to destroy our culture … Anglo-Protestant culture. […] specifically, they want more non-Christian, non-white people to come [to] supplant and replace the white voting population.” (For note: “White People Are Native Americans”, something that is important to remember when Haymes claims that “only Native Americans should hold political office in America.”) By contrast, as Haymes sees it, “Is the Bible in favor of these Ice raids? The answer is yes.” After all, “the Bible does not permit the civil magistrate to steal money from its citizens to pay for foreign nationals to come destroy our culture” – curiously, Haymes neglected to cite chapter and verse, but the idea is presumably all over the place and Haymes absorbed it from the Biblical whole by Biblical osmosis. And to emphasize, the anti-ICE protesters are “the bad guys” here because they are “actively trying to replace the native-born population of America with third-world migrants.”

 

Though he sometimes appears to promote the Lost Cause of the South, lamenting e.g. that the slaveholding states simply wanted to secede but “Lincoln and the north, the federal government said: no, you may not” and used unjustified power to get their way, it is worth noting that Haymes doesn’t, as opposed to what defenders of the Lost Cause idea usually try to do to cover their tracks, denounce slavery. Indeed, Haymes has explicitly argued that “the institution of slavery is not inherently evil. It is not inherently evil to own another human being” and “it is very important that every Christian affirm what I just said;” for in fact, “Christians in America have been led astray on this topic”. Haymes has also unconditionally endorsed the views of white nationalist and founder of the American Renaissance, Jared Taylor.

 

Haymes’s views on the state and society

“Republican Platform 2032 – Abolish Abortion & IVF – Ban Pornography – Bring Back Public Executions For Violent Offenders – Outlaw No Fault Divorce – Overturn Obergefell – Ban Gay Adoption – Ban public indecency (Which would ban pride parades). What did I miss?”

-       Joshua Haymes

 

Among other things, CoREC is famous for their view on voting in rights, in particular that women should lose the vote in the US (and note that Hegseth appears to agree). After all, as Haymes puts it, “Voting is not a sacred right granted by God” and should, as such, not apply to everyone. In Haymes’s Biblical vision for society, only men take part and “to be ruled by women is, in fact, a curse”; even in the home, “the father has actual authority over his wife and children. And then the wife has authority over the children too, but ultimately it’s a patriarchal vision” (he does apparently not even pretend to advocate complementarianism). So when Joshua Haymes leads his own family in prayer, he explicitly prays “that God would give [his wife] grace to obey me.” As such, what would things look like if women were to be able to exercise power by voting?! Good grief.

 

And if you thought he hates women, he will tell you that the target here is not really women, but Satan: “Satan loves androgyny” [?], so “Christian women would do well to make a concerted effort to dress in a distinctly feminine manner in today’s gender confused clown world.” Importantly, though, ‘feminine manner’ does not include bikinis, which should be banned. “By the grace of God We WILL pass laws that legislate women’s bodies,” says Haymes.

 

Haymes has also advocated for capital punishment for adultery and abortion (though he qualified his endorsement of the former a little: “I am not in favor of rushing to capital punishment for adultery. Though in principle I am not against it. I am certainly in favor of completely overturning no-fault divorce and outlawing adultery, and enforcing serious penalties for it”). In fact, Haymes is particularly concerned that such executions should be public: “Public executions are Biblical. Therefore public executions are good. Therefore we should bring back public executions.” That said, he is apparently “not yet sold on the idea that all capitol [sic] punishment must be a public stoning where the community partakes” and might prefer “death by a public firing squad wherein the accuser and witnesses partake in the firing”.

 

The focus on punishment is actually pretty central to Haymes’ (and CoREC’s) view of how the state should be organized (and it’s important to note that Hegseth, again, appears to agree). You see, “The state’s role is not to do good,” such as providing education or healthcare or welfare; that’s for the family and for the church. The state’s role is “primarily punishment, capital punishment and [other] punishments.” And of course, the state, as well as the family, is bound to operate within the confines of biblical law where the Bible is understood as a unity, and in which Old Testament law – including proscriptions on homosexuality and adultery – is still binding.

 

As for gay rights in particular, Haymes has called for the drowning of LGBTQ+ Pride marchers. He tried to clarify that one a bit: “I do not believe that anyone should be drowning anyone in this scenario. I am simply stating the fact that Christ says that drowning is better than causing little ones to sin” but also that we need to take responsibility to ensure that Christ’s words determine our actions and our laws. Keep in mind that homosexuality is “uniquely evil”, and that “the dystopian LGBT nightmare” (Hegseth) is “one of Satan’s greatest tools for excising Christ from not just our classrooms but our country”. At the very least, it is “indefensible” for any Christian to believe that “gay couples should have the right to adopt children”; rather, “we should be looking to BOTH legislate and stigmatize this wickedness into oblivion.” After all, “modern LGBT is likely worse than Sodom”, since “modern LGBT cultists target kids” – though fortunately, homosexuality can be cured!

 

Meanwhile, people who post social media content that he dislikes should be jailed (see: no executions called for): “I’m in favor of using political power to tamp down on evil, degenerate, anti-social behavior,” or really, anything that doesn’t align with his views on things.

 

According to Haymes, liberalism is currently a greater threat to the US than neo-Nazism, and the only hope for America is “total defeat of leftist liberal ideology”; as he sees it, “it’s Christ or chaos.” The left consists of “evil, hateful demons” who have “declared war” (some might be struck by the notion that it is Haymes who seems to be trying to declare war, but you probably shouldn’t apply concerns for accuracy or details here). Also, Martin Luther King Jr. was apparently “worse than Stalin”.

 

Haymes on religious freedom

Like most wingnuts of his kind, Haymes engages in free historical revisionism to back up his view of how society should be organized. According to Haymes, “America was founded as a Christian nation”, even though it is currently “an apostate nation.” The current focus on religious freedom, for instance, is as such not only in conflict with the Bible but with the US’s own founding principles –that is, Haymes elaborates: “the First amendment was designed to ensure that every American can be any kind of CHRISTIAN he wants […] It was not designed to ensure every American has the right to publicly worship demons. False religion can and should be banned from public life.” The scholarship that went into this conclusion is of the same kind that has gone into most of his other conclusions (he really doesn’t care about truth or accuracy on these issues), but one upshot is of course that “every single politician should be giving special treatment to Christianity.” Not that Haymes particularly fancies the Constitution anyways: what he really wants is to take America “back to 1750”, before the Constitution, “to a time when we were 99 percent Christian.”

 

Anyways, with regard to other religions, Haymes is a “Christian supremacist” who thinks that “every other religion worships dumb idols and demons,” and he is adamant that non-Christian religions should not be allowed in America: “We should absolutely ban public displays of demon worship, and require our political leaders to be Christian.” In particular, he wants it known that he “hate[s] Islam with a perfect hatred” (theologians might note that Haymes views hatred as a perfection) and “want it be completely obliterated” (at the very least, they should be legally prevented from holding office.) And he unequivocally supported “the Muhammadan travel ban from Trump 1? That was awesome.”

 

Hinduism is not much better. Reacting to a statue of a Hindu deity in Mississauga, Ontario, Haymes lamented that “This is what a conquered [i.e. ‘greatly replaced’] nations [sic] looks like”. Indeed, his views on other religions seem to give rise to his main gripe with the Trump administration, which doesn’t always realize that America was founded exclusively for Christians and therefore, as he has repeatedly pointed out, that Hindus like Vivek Ramaswamy “should not hold public office” – “We must not permit demon worshipers to hold public office in our nation.” He is also “pretty positive yoga is demonic” (like birth control) because of yoga’s perceived origin in Hinduism (he is, by the way, on collision course with many of his followers on that one).

 

Other views conspiracy theories

Haymes has also toyed with straight-up QAnon content, and he is for instance confident that “Pizzagate is real.”

 

As for science, Haymes is of course a creationist, primarily on the grounds that “Darwinian evolution is fake and gay.”

 

Diagnosis: Primarily a horror movie clown with murderous tendencies; a deeply fundamentalist, raging conspiracy theorist groyper whose concern for truth, accuracy or decency is non-existent. Now, there are many such people out there, but Haymes has a direct line to the loftiest circles of power in the US and seems to wield genuine influence over those circles.