#3007: William James Herath

Nothing says ‘paradigm-shattering discovery’ like a book on a scientific topic published by a vanity publisher from an author with no background in the relevant scientific field. There are plenty of these. William James Herath’s WHAT IS EVOLUTION?, published by something called ‘Createspace’, purports to show “how evolution is undefined, unscientific, and unlawful” and outline “why evolution is, in fact, illegal and unfit for the public classroom”, and though we haven’t bothered to actually look at its contents we nevertheless feel confindent about giving the author an entry here. Apparently, Herath presented some of his main findings at the Pensacola Truth Conference in 2018, where he ostensibly demonstrated “how to scientifically and legally shut down the claims of evolution, along with explaining destructive aspects of the false theology of God using evolution to create, aka theistic evolution,” accompanied by “a 4-week discussion guide designed to help youth pastors open a conversation addressing the ‘Faith Cavity’ of biological evolution” entitled HOW DID WE GET HERE?. He also shared “tips, tricks, stories, and secret weapons from his youth pastor experiences.”

 

Apparently, the book shows that teaching evolution in public schools is illegal because “it is only a theory” and because “there is no accepted definition of what evolution actually means”. On reading the latter, we immediately suspected that Herath – given his demonstrated level of scientific wherewithal – had looked at a couple of dictionaries and found discrepancies. And indeed, that’s precisely what he did: “The National Academy of Sciences also claims evolution to be a fact and offers three definitions of the term, and all of which conflict with Webster’s definition of evolution.”

 

According to his bio, Herath is an apologetic speaker with the Ratio Christi Speakers Bureau and has served on the National Vineyard Church Curriculum Team. He is also a filmmaker, though we haven’t had the opportunity to delve into his cinematic oeuvre. Moreover, “in addition to being an author/speaker, Herath has appeared in over forty national television commercials.” So there.

 

Now, Herath modestly admits – in the Kickstarter campaign he used to launch his book project – that “I am not the most qualified person to write this book, just being honest”, but “Like atheist and New York Times Bestselling Author Richard Dawkins not being the most qualified person to to write The God Delusion, I am equally unqualified to write a book about the constitutionality of evolution”. At least there is an inimitable personal style to his prose.

 

Diagnosis: Writing in 2026, his discoveries hasn’t yet quite managed to turn the wheels of science, but that’s presumably because it takes a while for scientists to become aware of what hit them when the impact is as earth-shattering as Herath’s.

 

#3006: Jami Hepworth

Jami Hepworth is not herself an MD but she is, apparently, the wife of an MD. Hepworth therefore does her antivaccine activism under the moniker “Skeptical Doctor’s Wife”. Whatever skills and knowledge of medicine her husband had access to in medical school has not been transferred to her by osmosis; indeed, she readily admits that her “increasingly unorthodox views according to the Western medicine paradigm have presented a bit of a rocky road for us”.

 

So Hepworth parrots all the standard anti-vaccine tropes, and although she claims to be “steeped in knowledge of the most relevant peer-reviewed literature”, she was apparently unaware that vaccines do not contain cell lines derived from aborted babies (which is, of course, a stock piece of intentional deception widely regurgitated on anti-vaccine sites). A perhaps more telling self-ascription of competence is her claim to also be steeped in “the gaps in the story about vaccines as shared by official sources” – yes, the stuff they don’t want you to know about. Like all anti-vaccine activists, Hepworth is more than anything else a conspiracy theorist.

 

Hepworth’s actual credentials consist of a BA in German literature from Brigham Young University, something she informed the public about when testifying against Nevada bill AB123, which was designed enhance the data collection process and centralize immunization information for rapid use during an outbreak. During the testimony, Hepworth referred to vaccination as an “example of medical cannibalism” and also stated that, over time, the cell lines actually used to grow viruses to make some vaccines “wane” (Hepworth avoids mentioning what mechanism she thinks is in play), meaning that vaccine manufacturers repeatedly “have to get new cell lines” (yes, it’s the vaccine manufacturers are engaged in the purchase and sale of abortion conspiracy theory because of course it is – this is the kind of person we’re dealing with here). She also, of course, asserted that vaccines are not tested against saline controls, because that’s what she has decided to believe; damn the facts and damn understand how vaccines or scientific testing works.

 

But yeah, it’s all there. Hepworth denies that herd immunity is real, because she confuses waning immunity from pertussis vaccination with lack of herd immunity, and she denies that anyone in developed countries dies of the diseases that wevaccinate against. And so on.

 

Diagnosis: In fairness, Hepworth is ultimately a minor figure – a conspiracy theorist with a facebook page where she complains about how ‘uncivil’ pro-vaccine advocates are because they refute her nonsense and advocate for vaccines. But she did try to get attention, so we’ll oblige her.

 

Hat-tip: Respectful insolence

 

#3005: Tyler Henry

A.k.a.  Tyler Henry Koelewyn – the full name he used when he was working as a clairvoyant for a new-age shop in California before being picked up by TV.

 

We suppose Greg Hendrix is too minor, and the stories of his antics too old (though one wonders what he’s up to these days), even for us. Tyler Henry, however, is not a minor figure. Tyler Henry is a major celebrity and heir-apparent to charlatans and delusional dingbats like Sylvia Browne and John Edward. Henry is a self-declared ‘clairvoyant’ and ‘medical intuitive’ (“Tyler can often physically sense the prior medical conditions of the spirits he is attempting to communicate with”), and a reality show personality who has appeared in in reality show series like Hollywood Medium with Tyler Henry and Life After Death with Tyler Henry, after getting his breakthrough following a 2015 appearance on Keeping Up with the Kardashians, where he gave a reading to one of the Kardashian sisters. He has subsequently gone on to give multiple readings to a variety of celebrities, including Megan Fox and Kristin Cavallari – of course, to make his show work, Henry usually has to claim that he doesn’t know who the celebrity he is talking to is so that they can be impressed when he relates information about them that is readily available via Google (yes, that’s the level of silly we’re talking about) – the most famous one being perhaps his reading with La Toya Jackson, in which he claimed to contact Michael Jackson (he didn’t), and the Alan Thicke affair, on which Henry largely bases his claims of being a ‘medical intuitive’. He has also published some books (Between Two Worlds: Lessons from the Other Side and Here & Hereafter: How Wisdom from the Departed Can Transform Your Life Now; yes, he mixes his psychic bullshit with bullshit selfhelp bullshit – what did you think?).

 

Henry, who needless to say has no more psychic powers than a bathtub, uses a mix of deceptive cold reading and hot reading techniques to get his results, which tends to produce the usual responses among the silly-of-mind partially in virtue of the Forer effect and partially because mundane predictions that an average 10-year-old could have made or providing information that’s readily available through Google (or, usually, nothing of substance whatsoever) sound impressive to idiots (like Jeryl Lippe of lifeandstylemag) when it is coming from a celebrity.

 

But although Tyler Henry and his antics may immediately strike you as light and laughable entertainment, there is a serious and tragic side to it. Tyler Henry is a grief vampire, a self-proclaimed psychic medium (one of many) who ‘prey upon the loved ones of those who have recently died [to] exploit the grieving for their own monetary gain’; and such actions are not only exploitative but risk causing significant harm to people in already difficult situations. And Henry isn’t only claiming to contact long-ago grandmothers but to put grieving relatives in touch with victims of suicide. This is, needless to say, not a good idea. Henry’s efforts has of course been promoted by Dr. Phil, but then Dr. Phil is himself a dangerous loon. Fortunately, good people are paying attention as well.

 

There is decent coverage of Henry and his ilk here.

 

Diagnosis: No, it’s not really funny even though it’s hard not to laugh. Henry himself can laugh, too, of course – all the way to the bank – for Henry is, regardless of whether he himself genuinely believes he has the abilities he claims to have or not (he probably does believe so), a fraud and a dipshit.

 

#3004: Robert Henderson

Robert Henderson is a delusional wingnut pastor and committed Trump cultist – so committed in fact, that he declared that God had called him to serve as Trump’s spiritual running mate before the 2020 election. He also wrote a book, Praying for the Prophetic Destiny of the United States and the Presidency of Donald J. Trump from the Courts of Heaven, which, according to himself, was based on three prophetic dreams he had about Trump. Moreover, Henderson proclaimed (e.g. in his book Prayers and Declarations that Open the Courts of Heaven) that anyone who opposed or ran against Trump was “fighting with God” and that Trump “should never be criticized” because “he sits in the seat of the president of the United States of America” and it is an offense toward God Himself to criticize a sitting president when the president is the one Henderson wants to be president. Of course, if the president is someone else, things are different. With regard to the Biden administration, for instance, “everything that they’re seeking to accomplish, it is all designed to weaken America” (in order, perhaps unwittingly, to usher in a one-world government under the dominion of Satan).

 

In fact, Henderson claims to believe that he is partially responsible for Trump’s 2016 victory – that is, in part, the gist of those three prophetic dreams he claims to have had. The first dream concerned an imaginary phone call from Trump during the 2016 primaries in which Trump asked him, Henderson, to hold a pro-Trump conference, which he did and which ostensibly helped Trump secure the nomination. The second dream, occurring after Trump won, concerned Trump asking him to be a part of his Cabinet: Henderson interpreted the request as Trump asking him to be Trump’s representative in “the courts of Heaven”, which he promptly accepted and which, entirely and exclusively according to what Henderson claims to have dreamt, secured Trump’s victory in said courts. (The third dream occurred following Trump’s inauguration and was the one in which he (Henderson) was asked to serve as Trump’s spiritual running mate in 2020.)

 

A self-declared “apostle”, Henderson belongs to an “apostolic family” named Global Reformers, whose purpose is to “Secure Nation’s Destinies From the Court of Heaven”. According to Global Reformers, “the thing that has hindered the fullest manifestation of the kingdom of God in the earth is the satanic realm still is holding nations under their influence because we as the church have yet to enforce and execute into place the finished works of the cross”, and Henderson and his fellows have been granted, by the Court of Heaven, the legal right to enforce God’s edicts and policies; their declarations and prayers hence tend to contain a lot of pseudolegal jargon, such as requests to “revoke the rights” of “demonic entities” to influence American politics. And his prayers work: In September 2020, for instance, Ruth Bader Ginsburg died just weeks after Henderson claims to have asked God to remove her from the Supreme Court; “that’s no accident,” said Henderson (part of Henderson’s beef with Ginsburg was of course abortion, though for Henderson that issue isn’t primarily “about the babies” but “about a blood altar that is inviting demonic powers”). In other words, Henderson hired a (divine) hitman to murder a Supreme Court justice he didn't like. He is fine with that.

 

As for the 2020 elections, which he likened to 9/11, and his self-proclaimed divine mandate, Henderson would spend much of the period wearing a shirt with an American flag because it would cause God to remember the United States of America (the cognitive faculties of Henderson’s God have some notable weaknesses). And during the campaigns, he called on God to dispatch an army of angels across the country – specifically singling out Pennsylvania and Michigan – to prevent the Democrats from stealing the election. “We release and commission and dispatch the angels into that place in Pennsylvania and in Michigan, Lord, and in all these states that have yet to be called, Father,” ranted Henderson (it is perhaps noteworthy how clear Henderson was that said angelic armies were his to command – God is merely the supplier), and declare that “they would not purposefully be delayed for the purpose of fraud. We break that. We remove that.” Such assistance was needed, since Trump was up against powerful enemies, including Covid, which Henderson said was a demonic plan to disrupt the economy and thereby prevent Trump’s reelection. He also also diagnosed vice-presidential candidate Kamala Harris as being governed by “the Antichrist spirit” and arranged prayer rallies to prevent said spirit from defeating Trump.

 

After his and Trump’s efforts failed, some people were understandably a bit miffed by all those self-declared prophets like Henderson who had declared that Trump was going to win. Henderson confidently dismissed their concerns: “Just because somebody prophesies something doesn't mean it’s going to come to pass”, said Henderson, and besides, the prophecy that Trump would win was “just one little piece of prophesying. In fact, I would say it’s a minor piece.” Silly people.

 

During the 2024 election campaigns, Henderson was again critical of Kamala Harris and stated that “the burning, searing, exposing heat of God now causes her campaign and her herself to wither away and become as nothing”. Meanwhile, Henderson did his part in trying to motivate people to vote for Trump. At self-proclaimed prophet Hank Kunneman’s Opening the Heavens conference, Henderson for instance reported having once miraculously healed a man who had developed a potentially fatal condition from voting Democratic: Some locals had told Henderson about some random person (apparently this is the kind of things random locals tell Henderson) of a man who was in the hospital with a serious condition that the doctors didn’t know how to treat; apparently this person was also a lifelong Democrat, even though people had told him that he “is in agreement with the spirit of death because of his vote” – which happens to be Henderson’s view on voting behavior as well (“Do you understand that when you vote, you come into agreement with spirits? So you need to make sure your vote is connecting you to the right thing in the spirit world”). So Henderson started praying for God to intervene and save this person from the “spirit of death that is claiming the legal right to take him out”. And lo and behold: five minutes later the hospital called someone in his audience to tell them the guy had been cured (that’s apparently the kind of thing that happens in Henderson’s audiences). “I want you to hear this: His vote connected him to something in the spirit world that had to be undone. Now, hopefully he repented. Hopefully he’s a good, solid Republican now.”

 

Diagnosis: Even by New Apostolic Reformation standards, Henderson is a deranged shitshow. Apparently he’s got some listeners, but those listeners would listen to anything anyways so it’s unclear whether Henderson and his delusions make much of a difference. Still.

 

#3003: Bryn Henderson

No, you can not.

We’ve talked about stem cell quackery a number of times before – but then it is a serious issue: Stem cell clinics in the US and beyond keep preying on people in genuinely shitty situations with ‘experimental’ but evidence-free, expensive and potentially dangerous cures and treatment regimes, sometimes accompanied by credulous anecdotes of “miraculous recoveries”. And people in shitty and desperate situations are easy targets for cynical and/or delusional grifters and woo-providers – they don’t, after all, even need to promise anything, since a mere glimmer of hope will usually do to part their victims from their savings (and said victims will often not be in any position afterwards to file any complaint).

 

One such business is (or was) the Regenerative Medical Group (RMG). RMG has claimed to provide “induced pluri-potent stem cells from your own cells via an affiliated laboratory” to not only regenerate cartilage and repair injury but to treat Parkinson’s disease, macular degeneration, cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, strokes, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease and even (of course) autism – executive director of RMG, Bryn J. Henderson (DO, JD, FACPE, CIME), claimed that RMG has helped “dozens” of children with autism using stem cells. As Henderson sees it, the stem cells circulate through the body, cross the blood-brain barrier and “make new cells” that change the course and prognosis of these kids and that most of the time, the change is major, along several parameters. If you wonder about the evidence for such claims you’ll look in vain beyond some alleged testimonials. Note also that there are, in fact, no actual live stem cells in the “amniotic stem cell treatments” people like Henderson and companies like the RMG are offering.

 

Now, although authorities have struggled (or been hesitant) to address the problem, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was ultimately sufficiently fed up with Henderson’s deceptive nonsense to bring deceptive advertising charges against him and his companies (in addition to RMG, Henderson was running something called Telehealth Medical Group) in 2018, in particular over his claims that amniotic stem cell therapies could restore the vision of blind people and “reverse autism symptoms.”

 

We’re actually not sure about the status of RMG these days, but Henderson is at least currently affiliated with something called InnovateMed, where he is described as an authority on regenerative medicine. 

 

Diagnosis: Well, maybe he’s learned something? We’re not particularly optimistic, though.

 

#3002: Albert Hendershot & Harold Sorenson

This is some old shit, but we deem it worth mentioning here since people like Albert Hendershot and Harold Sorenson are still around (Hendershot and Sorenson may, for all we know, be around themselves) and certainly up to no good these days either. Yes, Hendershot and Sorenson are birthers, and they were among a number of dingbats who filed lawsuits challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president after the 2012 election. Hendershot filed an unsuccesful suit in Alabama in December 2011 alleging that Obama’s birth certificate was forged – Hendershot claimed he had “staggering” evidence that Obama was using a fraudulently obtained social security number issued in Connecticut – and that he was therefore ineligible to be on the Alabama primary ballot. Sorenson filed a similar suit in 2012, with an additional request that Judge Helen Shores Lee, who is black and also had presided over Hendershot’s suit, should recuse herself because “she has racial bias and a lack of Constitutional knowledge.” The suit was not particularly more successful than the Hendershot one (and these were not the only ones in Alabama), and the court awarded the Alabama Democratic Party its costs and fees, though they promised not to collect the money from Sorenson as long as he refrained from “bad-mouthing the court and this decision.” It is worth mentioning that Sorenson filed a similar suit in 2008 challenging the eligibility of both Obama and McCain.

 

Diagnosis: Whatever. We have some suspicions concerning what these incoherently paranoid morons are up to today if they are still around, however. And there are plenty of others like them if they are not.

 

#3001: Megan Heimer

A.k.a. Megan Redshaw [current name]

 

Megan Heimer is a naturopath and “wellness” blogger for a blog called Living Whole, a cesspit of woo, pseudoscience, conspiracy theories and – of course – antivaccine (https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Anti-vaccination_movement) lunacy. (In fact, there seems to be several blogs of that name, and the suspicion that a name like that shouldn’t inspire trust is flagrantly borne out by most of them.) Indeed, Heimer, whose credentials, according to herself, are “a degree in Political Science and [I] am an Attorney, Doctor of Naturopathy, Certified Natural Health Educator, Registered Power Yoga Instructor, writer, and stay-at-home mama,” rejects all medicines she deems non-“natural”, not just vaccines – her approach really has nothing to do with facts or (really) health at all but with fundamentalist adherence to a more trendy set of religious tenets that allow her to feel a very religious form of righteousness and nurture a cadre of acolytes who treat her various pronounciations as authoritative – but she is indeed most famous for her antivaccine activism. Note, by the way, that although naturopathic schools in general offer nothing more than pseudoeducation, Heimer’s diploma – on the basis of which she has called herself “Dr. Heimer” – is from Trinity College of Natural Health, which is a straight-up diploma mill and which is, for instance, on the list of institutions whose degrees are illegal to use in the State of Texas.

 

And Heimer will use – and has used – most antivaccine PRATTs in the antivaccine toolbox to push her case, including lying through her teeth. In her (viral) “rebuttal” to a very sensible article on antivaccine activists’ lies, Heimer for instance asserted that “the vaccine court has rule [sic] that evidence of a causal relationship between autism and MMR exists”; she didn’t provide any link or even reference to any such ruling, of course, because the assertion is a pretty obvious and easily checked lie. Relatedly, Heimer just stated, utterly falsely, that “vaccine inserts, and countless court cases have confirmed this link”. Again, of course, no such inserts or court cases (this one obviously doesn’t count) exist outside Heimer’s febrile imagination; indeed, court cases have quite clearly established the opposite conclusion (in an update to her post, she did, in fairness, provide one link to a vaccine court case she claimed “ruled that evidence of a causal relationship between autism and MMR exists” even though the court explicitly did not rule on the question of causation). Or in other words: Insofar as it is obvious even to her readers that Heimer herself has no background whatsoever in any field that would make her a credible authority on vaccines (and despite her stand that “it takes no credentials, no formal education, and no ‘M.D’ behind your name to take an educated stance on this issue”), she does at least recognize the need to invoke authoritative sources (also beyond other non-experts like Neil Z. Miller); so she just makes them up. And yes: it is, for all practical purposes, lying: We have no doubt Heimer believed her own claims when she wrote them, but the fact that she responded to commenters pointing out her errors not by addressing the criticisms or updating her post but by deleting the comments and blocking the commenters, demonstrates in abundance that honesty is not her strong suit.

 

We don’t, by the way, feel the need to comment on her apparently popular post “God Does Not Support Vaccines” (she is, of course, not the only one who has tried to make that case). Here, however, is a discussion of her Dunning-Kruger approach to Vitamin K shots for newborns, which synthesizes virtually every myth or piece of misinformation about Vitamin K shots and vaccines in general ever produced for the Internet and draws its conclusions on the ‘makes sense to me’ strategy and Heimer’s lack of knowledge or understanding of the issues she is discussing. Of course, as Heimer sees it, criticism of her misinformation, lies and quackery is hate speech, no less.

 

Her response to a CDC questionnaire that tells you what vaccines are recommended for people with chronic diseases (from back when the CDC were trustworthy on these issues) is telling: “First,” says Heimer, “vaccines don’t prevent chronic disease”, which is a rather typical response, given that the CDC was claiming no such thing but rather gave their recommendations based on the fact that patients with certain chronic diseases are more susceptible to complications from many vaccine-preventable disease. “Secondly,” says Heimer, “vaccines cause chronic disease. It’s written all over the package inserts, PubMed database, and thousands of peer-reviewed studies. (Don’t bother telling the CDC, they already know.)” Do you think she actually provides any sources? Can you guess why not? “Third, if you have a chronic disease, you’re more likely to suffer from a vaccine adverse reaction” (by which Heimer of course means mythical vaccine injuries). The possibly novel spin here, however, is Heimer’s conclusion that the CDC publishing information about vaccine recommendations for people with chronic diseases at all, is just a “sad attempt by the CDC to pit parent against parent. Nothing else works. We’re educated and we see through their lacking data, intentional cover-ups, and misleading propaganda, including their latest ploy at ‘scaring’ parents into vaccinating.” But as Heimer states, “it’s like we’re immune to bull$h*t”, and we believe that statement: no facts or evidence will sway Heimer for this has, for her, never been a question of facts or evidence.

 

As mentioned, Heimer runs through all the familiar antivaxx tropes and talking points, but she often has an even more unhinged take on them than even regular anti-vaccine ranters, for instance with regard to the myth of “aborted baby parts”, e.g. in her post “What You Didn’t Know About the Aborted Baby Parts in Your Vaccines” (yes, the post does list a good number of things you certainly didn’t know, for obvious reasons). Heimer is referring to vaccines made with fetal embryo fibroblast or retinal cells from cell lines derived (they replicate infinitely) from a few electively terminated pregnancies (abortions) in the 1960s to 80; there are, of course, no aborted baby parts or tissue in vaccines, but Heimer is deeply confused about that: “Have you read the CDC’s vaccine ingredient list? Why would they list aborted baby parts as ingredients if they weren’t actually in vaccines?” responds Heimer, assuming that her readers don’t check and realize that the CDC of course doesn’t list aborted fetal parts as ingredients because vaccines don’t contain them. But Heimer is not going to let facts and reason resolve a good confusion: “you might have also heard that only two babies were used and it was a really long time ago, which justifies the continued use of shooting up live babies with dead babies” (nope), but that, she concludes, “just simply isn’t true and if you think it is, watch one of the many Planned Parenthood videos. These people are harvesting baby parts for a reason,” imagines Heimer. And since aborted baby parts obviously can’t be an effective means to achieve immunity from disease, she concludes that CDC is relying on some form of dark magic: “Aborted baby is supposedly some sort of magic that makes vaccines more effective”. Nope, she doesn’t try. It’s not her style.

 

Source: Don't remember; please inform us.

Now, LivingWhole isn’t (or wasn’t) merely about vaccines, though: as mentioned above, Heimer rejects modern medicine in general, in favor of Modern Alternative Mama Kate Tietje’s crackpot Earthley products, claims that there is an ongoing war on homeopathy and that measles is no big deal (“This Mama Isn’t Scared of the Shmeasle Measles”); according to her blog, she and her family “do not use any chemical products in our home or on our bodies”, they “believe in natural childbirth and had our last baby un-assisted at home” and they “home school”, something that, given her relationship with facts and knowledge, is a tragedy. Indeed, to many people, she is probably most famous for the brouhaha around her attempt to adopt two children from DRC, a story that, even if you trusted to her own descriptions doesn’t exactly portray her in a very sympathetic light.

 

And though she was most famous some years ago, when the adoption story was ongoing, it’s not like she’s gone. Here is a discussion of her 2025 post (“Why You Shouldn’t Be Scared of Measles”) about recent measles outbreaks. In the post, Heimer – now Redshaw – manages to get every claim wrong, and usually even in ways that can be easily checked if her readers bother, from the claim that among the people needing hospital care in the recent Texas outbreak “nearly half were fully vaccinated” (they were, in fact, all unvaccinated; nearly’ is doing some heavy lifting in Heimer’s claim), through misinformation about shedding, to her claim that alarmism about measles is unwarranted since, even though even she has to admit that people die, more people die from falling and she doesn’t see fearmongering about “staircases” or “sidewalks”. Maybe we’re completely off about American culture here, but we do have the impression that people constructing staircases and sidewalks, and not the least parents of small children, do have some concerns about the safety of staircases or sidewalks, and we are accordingly somewhat worried about Heimer’s execution of her role as a parent of small children. We are, as previously noted, not the only ones harboring such concerns.

 

For insights into Heimer’s lies, falsehoods and inaccuracies – at least up until ca. 2019 – this thread might be useful. Of particular note is Heimer’s own deployment of classical sockpuppetry.

 

Diagnosis: Paranoid, narcissistic and completely unhinged moron, and yes, we worry about the safety of both her and the people around her. Nonetheless, she seems to have a number of readers, and we worry about them, too.

 

Hat-tip: violentmetaphors