Real Science-4-Kids imprint publishes student texts, teacher
manuals, and student laboratory workbooks –ostensibly covering chemistry,
biology and physics to serve kindergarten through ninth grade – specifically
targeted at homeschoolers. The material does, of course, not primarily seek to introduce
kids to science, but to religiously
motivated science-denialism,
including creationism, and Rebecca Keller, who runs the outfit, has realized
that since creationists can’t challenge scientists on evidence, truth,
accountability and research, they should focus on “educational” materials aimed
at kids instead. This is of course the usualy ploy among denialists: there’s a
reason the Intelligent Design movement has focused on getting Intelligent
Design taught in public schools and not on doing research to establish
Intelligent Design as a viable scientific alternative. Keller has frequently
spoken at intelligent design conferences about and provided testimony for
teaching the controversy and allowing students to “critically evaluate” all scientific data that support
and/or oppose scientific conclusions, once again because the focus of
Intelligent Design conferences tend to be outreach, not science.
She has also been directly involved in various attempts to
get Intelligent Design creationism taught in public schools. For instance, in
2006 she was invited by Mike Fair to testify before the South Carolina
Education Oversight Committee in favor of language to allow students to
“critically evaluate” all scientific data. Like all such attempts, this one didn’t include any
discussion of how students, with little or no prior knowledge or understanding
of the field, its questions, or research, would be in a position to “critically
evaluate” any of it.
Now, Keller herself is a former assistant professor at the
University of New Mexico, where she did indeed work in molecular biology. Her
rejection of evolution was not grounded in science, however, but in religious
fundamentalism, though it provided her with the credentials needed to be a signatory to the Discovery Institute’s petition A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism.
Keller herself is currently a home-schooling mom with no academic or research
affiliation.
Her educational material is apparently extensively used,
however, since many homeschoolers are religious fundamentalist science
denialists.
Diagnosis: Anti-scientists. And that is of course precisely
what makes her and her writings rather popular in certain quarters. Influential
and dangerous.
I know the t's are a ways off, but when you get to them, I nominate one William Tapley for inclusion; the guy calls himself "the third eagle of the apocalypse," which really tells you all you need to know.
ReplyDelete