Thursday, May 11, 2023

#2644: Tucker Carlson

We’ll keep this relatively brief, but Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson is a political commentator, wingnut influencer, conspiracy theorist, anti-vaccine promoter, Media Matters 2022 Misinformer of the Year award winner, (sometimes) Trump sycophant (and key advisor), firm fan of Alex Jones, propagandist and at least arguably a fascist and white nationalist, famous from his (until recently) Fox News primetime show Tucker Carlson Tonight. He is also the co-founder and former editor-in-chief of The Daily Caller. His rise to wingnut prominence is detailed here. He’s currently ditched by Fox, but we doubt he’ll go away completely. Our description of him should also be read in light of the possibility that his whole persona is merely an act.

 

Like many contemporary wingnuts, Carlson used to be at least somewhat oriented toward libertarianism, before moving into conspiracy theories, paranoia and martyr complexes, the Decline of America, authoritarianism and faux anti-elitism (elites being everyone he disagrees with, who then, by virtue of disagreeing with him, are united in aconspiracy – Carlson himself has by 2022 anet wealth of an estimated $420 million and his family is deeply politically connected – he’s a “millionaire funded bybillionaires”). His target elite is of course the other elites. Since facts tend to be stacked against him, Carlson is a supporter of political violence to get things the way he wants them to be, and he has been an outspoken supporter of the January 6 2021 riot.

 

It is always worth remembering that Fox News, in 2020, defended itself in a defamation lawsuit by arguing that Carlson cannot be trusted to provide accurate information on his show, and that the court actually judged, accordingly, that Carlson is not a credible source of news and is not “stating actual facts” on his show.

 

Misogyny and homoerotic anti-gay nonsense

A firm defender of G.O.D. gender roles, Carlson considers the idea of a woman paying for meals “disgusting” and is very upset by the fact that women are allowed to serve in the military. His views on women and gender roles, in his own words, are summarized here. He is also a consistent defender of Warren Jeffs.

 

His view of men and masculinity is juicier, however. In general, Carlson defends the type of macho ideal beloved by people like Putin, Orbán and Andrew Tate, and his style of macho idolizing often turns weird, as expressed e.g. in the trailer for his … documentary? … The End of Men, the premise of which was “the total collapse of testosterone levels in American men”. The trailer became known as one of the most strikingly homoerotic features on the internet, with hunky shirtless men wrestling and doing ‘manly’ things, as well as for Carlson’s laughably idiotic ‘treatment’ suggestion for the (unproven) ‘problem’ of low testosterone, namely red light therapy: apparently the means to become a High-Testosterone Manly-Man is testicle tanning using light woo (this one is particularly useful on the connection between homoerotic woo and the fascist currents in Carlson’s rightwing circles).

 

No fan of explicitly gay people, Carlson’s has for instance expressed his dislike of California’s pro-LGBT curriculum: “It’s all part of an effort to force kids to approve of homosexuality.” He is also firmly opposed to gun safety, seatbelt laws and the “inelegant” and “creepy metric system.

 

Carlson on race

Carlson has, for a while, been one of the most significant promoters of white nationalist rhetoric. Much of it is familiar stuff, such as claiming that California is becoming a third world country  because of Latin American migrants or that Ilhan Omar isliving proof that the way we practice immigration has become dangerous to this country”, but Carlson has also promoted “The Great Replacement” theory (indeed, he has explicitly denied promoting it, explicitly promoted it by name, and then claimed that he has never heard of it while simultaneously accusing “the left” of pushing it – all depending on what’s convenient at the moment). He has for instance repeatedly claimed that Mexico has interfered in American elections more successfully than Russia by “packing our electorate; indeed, the Democratic party is in generaltrying to replace the current electorate” with “more obedient voters from the Third World”. “If you change the population, you dilute the political power of the people who live there. So every time they import a new voter, I become disenfranchised as a current voter,” said Carlson.

 

Meanwhile, he has described white supremacy as a hoax and “a conspiracy theory used to divide the country and keep a hold on power”.

 

Foreign policy

Carlson is, as mentioned, a huge fan of Putin, and he consistently defended Russia’s military actions at least throughout early 2022 (“Why wouldn’t we be on Russia’s side?”) – but also after: Even after February 2022, Carlson has been opposed to any sort of assistance to Ukraine, and he has regurgitated Kremlin propaganda on numerous occasions and whined that pundits and politicians who were demanding strong action against Russia are “pathetic” “Twitter trolls” spewing “ad hominem” attacks against Vladimir Putin. He has also concocted and promoted various conspiracy theories about the war, e.g. that “Ukrainian interests have pumped millions of lobbying dollars into Washington, D.C.” to “tell us that Russia is bad” and the ridiculously silly delusion that the US is supporting bioweapons labs in Ukraine based on rumors propagated without evidence or any anchoring in reality by infamous Russian propaganda outlets and filtered through Russian bots on Qanon discussion sites. When retired U.S. Army Col. Douglas MacGregor, a delusional fringe wingnut, falsely said, on Carlson’s show, that Putin’s government “rests on the foundation of Orthodox Christianity” and that “we should celebrate that, not try to destroy it,” Carlson responded: “Maybe that’s one of the reasons we are trying to destroy it?

 

When Putin declared two regions of Ukraine to be “independent states” and authorized Russian forces to be deployed to the region as “peacekeepers”, Carlson rushed to his defense, with an impressive array of whataboutism tactics (we got a lot of killers. What, you think our country’s so innocent?) and why does Ukraine have “a God-given right to territorial integrity” when we have “Hondurans invading Texas”?) and pointing out Putin’s positive character traits: “Has Putin ever called me a racist? ... Did he manufacture a worldwide pandemic that wrecked my business and kept me indoors for two years?Carlson’s pro-Russia propaganda has been widely broadcast and circulated in Russia.

 

Carlson’s bromances are not Putin-exclusive, though, but encompasses Hungary’s Viktor Orbán as well. An advocate for Orbán’s “STOP Soros” act, Carlson even made a documentary, Hungary vs. Soros, where he depicted Hungary as a traditional conservative Christian paradise threatened by, well, George Soros, as well as promoting relatively overt racism. The documentary was widely circulated in Hungary. Carlson has also praised the Chinese government as “virtuous” for intervening in its citizens’ private lives and placing restrictions on gaming and celebrity culture and argued that the Biden administration should do the same because, apparently, freedom – government overreach is overreach only when Carlson doesn’t get to decide how such overreach is employed.

 

By contrast to the Russian, Hungarian or Chinese governments, Carlson has accused other countries’ leaderships of authoritarianism; according to Carlson “there’s no more fearful despot in the world”, one that is more dictatorial, than Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau, and in February 2022 he suggested that Volodymyr Zelenskyy is “a dictator who’s friends with everyone in Washington.”

 

January 6 riots

A vocal defender of the January 6 riot (he got Ted Cruz to apologize for calling it a “terrorist attack”), Carlson has repeatedly asserted (falsely) thatthere’s no evidence that white supremacists were responsible for what happened on January 6.”. He has also promoted (based largely on the ideas of Darren Beattie of Revolver News) the conspiracy theory that the Capitol storming was a false flag” FBI operation intended to “suppress political dissent” and that unindicted co-conspirators in rioters’ indictments were government agents, saying that FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol on January 6, according to government documents”.

 

In October 2021, many of the conspiracy theories were collected in the three-part overtly fascist series Patriot Purge, produced by Carlson and co-written with pizzagate conspiracy theorist Scooter Downey, which for instance suggested that the January 6 attack was a government false flag operation to implicate the rightwing. Carlson stated on-air that the government had “launched a new war” on American citizens and characterized his own series as “rock-solid factually”. Needless to mention, the claims in the series have no connections to facts, and even rightwing commentators decried the series as “a collection of incoherent conspiracy-mongering, riddled with factual inaccuracies, half-truths, deceptive imagery, and damning omissions” (though at least Fox itself ultimately bowed, however).

 

And not only is Carlson an ardent promoter of stop-the-steal misinformation (he has actually, in connection with idiot Kari Lake’s election fraud accusations in Arizona, put the stop-the-steal activist relationship with evidence rather succinctly: the only proof there isn’t election fraud in Arizona is if the Republican wins), he has also tried to question the Watergate scandal – how could it be, wondered Carlson, that Nixon won the 1972 election by the “biggest margin ever” (false, of course) and then “within a year he was disgraced, and six months later he was gone.” That, thinks Carlson, is something “no one can still explain even to this day”. Because if he doesn’t want to grasp basic facts, then no one can grasp them – which, by the way, is also his go-to strategy when it comes to climate change:

 

Climate change denialism

One of Carlson’s most recognizable features is his trademark uncomprehending expression when he e.g. fails to understand basic science and, because of his failure to understand, plumps for the denialist position, as he does e.g. on global warming. The Carlson incomprehending look is also his main strategy for undermining the scientific evidence e.g. when confronted with basic facts – yes, it’s the argument from incredulity on steroids: prideful ignorance, and it works.

 

Covid misinformation (but of course)

Usually an opponent of face masks, which he does not understand, Carlson has claimed that mask mandates is the equivalent to living in North Korea. The point of the comparison was somewhat unclear, as Carlson was adamant that he didn’t mind authoritarianism, something he promptly emphasized by suggesting that parents who have their children wear face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic were actually committing child abuse, and urging his viewers to call the police on such parents because parents’ choice applies only when parents choose what Carlson tells them to choose. Carlson’s opposition to facemasks is not particularly consistent, however, as it keeps changing depending on what Democrats are saying about the subject – indeed, Carlson’s judgment of the severity of Covid-19 has been rather inconsistent, depending mostly on what his allies and enemies, respectively, are saying at any moment.

 

Carlson has otherwise promoted a vast array of silly conspiracy theories about COVID, including variants of the lab leak theory (China has “blood on its hands) (yes, it’s still a conspiracy theory, especially in the variants promoted by Carlson) and – of course – accusing Anthony Fauci of contributing to the creation of the virus or, citing e.g. conspiracy theorist Nicolas Wade’s evidence-free speculations, even of being “the guy who created Covid. And he has, of course, touted the imaginary benefits of the anti-parasite medication ivermectin as a possible COVID-19 treatment; which it most certainly is not.

 

Carlson has frequently invited (and parroted the claims of) Covid-denialists and conspiracy theorists, including Alex Berenson, onto his show to spout misinformation; Carlson even offered to fund Berenson’s lawsuit against Twitter after the latter had correctly banned his account for Covid-19 misinformation.

 

Anti-vaccine propaganda

Carlson’s descent into regular promotion of anti-vaccine propaganda started – of course – with JAQing off about the COVID-19 vaccine, suggesting thatmaybe it doesn’t work” and displaying a total misunderstanding of the public health guidelines for fully vaccinated people in the process (“If vaccines work, why are vaccinated people still banned from living normal lives? […] So maybe it doesn’t work and they’re simply not telling you that. […] What’s the other potential explanation? We can’t think of one” – the key phrase being of course ‘can’t think of one’), as well as cherry picking data, distorting and misrepresenting studies, and demonstrating that he does not understand the concepts of causality or control groups – yes, Carlson tried to fear-monger using the fact that some people coincidentally died within a month after receiving the vaccine, which is of course expected when millions of people get the vaccine, and he did of course not consider comparing that group to people who weren’t vaccinated. Meanwhile, businesses requiring people be vaccinated were “medical Jim Crow” and vaccine mandates in the U.S. Armed Forces are designed to oustthe sincere Christians in the ranks, the free thinkers, the men with high testosterone levels, and anyone else who doesn't love Joe Biden”.

 

He has also claimed that the COVID vaccine gave us “the single deadliest mass vaccination event in modern history” (based on figures dreamt up in various antivaccine blog posts) and compared vaccine requirements to Nazi and Imperial Japanese Army medical experimentation because he, as already demonstrated and like antivaxxers in general, doesn’t understand what an experiment is or what it means to be experimental, which is of course the confusion that lies at the core of the antivaxx rambling murderlustful wet dream about a Nuremberg 2 (Carlson’s guest about the latter was the absolutely rabidly insane antivaccine conspiracy theorist Robert Malone). And to give you the full flavor of Carlson’s level of dishonesty, you can check out his attacks on CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization practices here – or his stunningly dishonest reporting about an alleged “revelation” that Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine phase 3 trials didn’t test its ability to block transmission: a “cover-up”, according to Carlson. Hopefully we don’t need to explain to readers here how laughably idiotic that take is. More recently, he has latched onto the antivaccine “#DiedSuddenly” campaign, which – as antivaxxers have always done – tries to blame any death or illness experienced by anyone (such as Damar Hamlin) on zeh vaccine, with no evidence or plausibility whatosever

 

And Carlson’s antivaccine views are not limited to the COVID-19 vaccines, but expands to vaccines in general; Carlson has for instance promoted the work of anti-vaccine leader Robert Kennedy, jr., including the latter’s book The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health (Children's Health Defense).

 

And yes, he has, like any good anti-vaccine conspiracy theories, invoked the VAERS database, deliberately misunderstanding how it works.

 

There’s a decent Tucker Carlson resource here.

 

Diagnosis: Lots of people think, incredible as that may sound, that he has some good points, and just assume that his claims about reality actually have anything to do with reality. Some among his audience also thinks he is pretty smart; and in fact: that may very well be the case – Carlson is a post-truther and a bullshitter, and he really just doesn’t care about whether his claims are correct or not as long as they serve the narrative he wants to tell. But that is on its own enough to make him a loon – one of the most influential and dangerous not only in the US but in the world today.

 

Hat-tip: rationalwiki

Sunday, May 7, 2023

#2643: Allan Carlson & Paul Mero

Hardcore anti-gay activism is still a thing, and among Catholic activists, Allan Carlson and Paul Mero’s natural family” manifesto is a somewhat influential rallying point – and Carlson, Mero and their ilk are targeting not only LGBT rights and abortion, but also contraception, sex education (“[w]e will end the corruption of children through state ‘sex education’ programs”) and liberalized divorce laws.

 

Carlson, in addition to being a rabid Taliban-style fundamentalist and a rather influential figure in the rabid Taliban-style fundamentalist movement, is also a former professor of history at Hillsdale College in Michigan, President Emeritus of the Howard Center for Family, Religion and Society, former director of the Family in America Studies Center, founder of the International Secretary of the World Congress of Families (currently headed by Brian Brown; there is a decent resource on the WFC here), former president of the Rockford Institute and editor of The Natural Family: An International Journal of Research and Policy newsletter. Apart from hatred of LGBT groups, much of Carlson’s work has addressed family values and what he perceives to be the underlying causes of population decline, which, in addition to being non-Catholic, include sex education, contraception and – but of course – LGBT rights. These emergence of these factors can to a large extent be blamed on feminism, whose impact on women’s roles in society is disastrous and which continues to take its toll on the family. Contraception is a particularly sore point for Carlson, and especially the “contraceptive mentality that have led women away from wishing for “a full quiver of children (oh yes, Carlson is a major proponent); he did for instance appear in Kevin Peeples’s weird movie Birth Control: How Did We Get Here? starring Kevin Swanson). Carlson, of course, is a defender of complementarianism, as is his organization.

 

Paul Mero, on the other hand, is affiliated with the Western Governors University and is the chairman of the board for Transcend Together; he was previously CEO of Leadership Project for America, president of Sutherland Institute and for a long time in the 90s employed in various roles by various legislators at Capitol Hill, e.g. representing the Christian Action Network, coordinating the WFC and co-forming the Conservative Action Team, which would later evolve into the House Freedom Caucus, where his work was in particular focused on trying to get organized prayer back into public schools, defund the National Endowment for the Arts, blaming sin for AIDS, and combatting “sex studies”. Like his partner Carlson, Mero is fond of using the “freedom” label for his political goals because it has positive connotations and because no one would guess his efforts had anything to do with freedom if he didn’t explicitly label them such (after all, the WFC’s message of freedom should be sharply distinguished from the “diabolical” and “false message of human liberation”, according to Carlson).

 

The WFC, of course, condemns gay marriage and life as well as anything else that could be seen as a threat to traditional families, including abortion and single-parent families, and the organization has ties with colorful characters like Scott Lively, Angela Lanfranchi, Rafael Cruz and Janice Shaw Crouse. The WFC is also famous for promoting falsehoods and pseudoscience related to women’s health, such as the thoroughly refuted idea that abortion causes breast cancer and conspiracy theories about the contraceptive pill. The WFC’s primary role is to bring various fundies together at annual conferences and events around the world (e.g. here), and to issues wingnut petitions. Despite its status as an obvious crank organization, the WFC has obtained consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council, and its conferences draw a disturbing number of powerful people, including state leaders. Its ties to Russia are worth an investigation; the WFC has also enthusiastically supported Putin’s anti-LGBT laws, and Carlson himself has accused former president Obama of being “hostile to Russia” because Russia is a “pro-family voice” and Obama isn’t because being pro-family means being disgusted by families that aren’t organized the way Carlson wants families to be organized. WCF official Larry Jacobs, meanwhile, has said that the Russian law banning LGBT ‘propaganda’ was agreat idea” and that the “Russians might be the Christian saviors of the world.”

 

Elsewhere, things aren’t unequivocally going in what the WFC would judge to be the right direction; Carlson, who fancies himself a historian, sees fascism at work: “The parallel I see here is what happened in Italy, Germany, other lands in the 1920s and 1930s as fascism began to impose its fear-driven grip on debate, on conversation, and on policy-making,” which is pretty rich for someone explicitly defending family policies that are more or less copy-pasted from the Nazi regime’s Kinder, Küche, Kirche policy.

 

There is a decent portrait of the WFC here.

 

Diagnosis: Though practically indistinguishable from the Taliban or Iran’s moral police ideologywise (though of course distinct in terms of means available to attaining their goals), Carlson, Mero and their organization are enormously powerful and influential – though their affiliation with and explicit praise of Russia might hopefully provide a bit of a stumbling block for their continued influence in the West, they are seriously dangerous.

Thursday, May 4, 2023

#2642.5: George Carlo

Nonsense
Silly and pseudoreligious fear-mongering about new technology is nothing new, and although one could argue, in a non-lunatic way, for a cautionary principle, when the evidence is in, concerns should be adjust usually aren’t with these people –  rather, the concerns get augmented with conspiracy theories. Cell phone radiation and wifi are already classics off the genre – the idea that radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation used by cell phones and wireless networks is the cause of adverse health effects, from cancer to mental illness, is an idea that, like homeopathy, just won’t go away, regardless of the evidence; instead, we get fake diagnoses like “electromagnetic hypersensitivity”, and cynical (and/or incompetent) practitioners and promoters who make names for themselves as authorities in conspiracy theory circles. It doesn’t help that the idea has sufficient sensationalist potential for shoddy pseudoresearch to be picked up by mainstream media, or that the IARC erroneously categorized cell phone radiation as a “possible carcinogen” (even if “possible” in their classification system actually means probably not).

 

One of the main promoters of cell phone radiation misinformation and conspiracy theories is George L. Carlo, an epidemiologist, lawyer and notorious science-for-sale entrepreneur. Carlo started out as a hired expert for the Dow Chemical Company to tell people that they shouldn’t care about dioxins, before founding the Health and Environmental Sciences (HES), which is most famous for their work on behalf of tobacco companies to show that medical doctors were biased against smoking and therefore unreliable sources for information on passive smoking. Because of this background, Carlo was hired by the Cellular Telephone Industry Association (CTIA) in 1993 to do whitewashing campaigns on behalf of the cell phone industry, but broke with them when the money ran out in order to make money for the opposition instead. There is a nice rundown of Carlo’s career and various … activities here.

 

Carlo subsequently founded the Science and Public Policy Institute, and went on to claim that the CTIA was responsible for covering up scientific findings that showed cellphones were dangerous – he never specified which findings he were referring to, but he managed to draw some media attention – which landed him e.g. a stint with Peter Angelos, a product liability lawyer who sought to sue the mobile phone companies on behalf of clients who had brain cancer (ultimately unsuccessful because they were unable to even remotely suggest a link between cell phones and brain cancer), and a book-contract with journalist Martin Schram for Cellphones: Invisible Hazard in the Wireless Age, which has become a classic in the cell phone radiation conspiracy industry despite its ridiculous cherry-picking and avoidance of discussing actual science. Carlo even joined forces with BioPro, a ‘bio-shield’ company, to promote a laughable, tin-foil-hat-derived stick-on device to protect yourself from harmful cellphone radiations”, and he has later, with one David Solomon, run a project with “Protege Sports inc” to market a “clothing enhancement that ostensibly protects baseball players from radiation and enhances their performance.

 

Carlo also founded the EMR University, an institution that purports to provide “professional training” in the “risks and interventions related to electromagnetic radiation exposure” and provides their own certification for “Certified Electromagnetic Radiation Safety Advisors” to people like Carlo’s partner Tamara Mariea, who offers treatments for autism, a condition she attributes to electromagnetic radiation exposure for children made vulnerable bycontaminated vaccines”. The faculty consists, in addition to Carlo, of Jill Ungar, an administrator at Carlo’s group the Safe Wireless Initiative, as well as a “Certified HypnoBirthing Practitioner” and Reiki Master, and the late David James, a Florida-based British naturopath and author (with his wife Ora James Murphy) of Handy Way to Cook Your Brain: What’s the damage? and Cellular Radiation: Is this our next Titanic?, who believed that electromagnetic radiation was a threat partially because cloud-seeding, alien organisms from the stratosphere have overwhelmed our immune systems.

 

Carlo still manages to persuade journalists to write positive spins about him, such as a 2018 piece in The Nation penned by conspiracy theorists Mark Hertsgaard and Mark Dowie, discussed here, which continued to do what conspiracy theorists do: When the evidence overwhelmingly shows that you are wrong, declare conspiracy, then declare victory – yes, all the large-scale studies showing no connection between cell phone radiation and any harmful effects, involving multiple scientists and institutions: it’s all shillwork. We admit, though, that Carlo is rather good at misrepresenting them as saying the opposite of what they actually say.

 


In addition to promoting studies that are shoddy at best (but usually not even qualifying as studying anything whatsoever), Carlo continues to produce bullshit (much of it reports written together with his long-term associate Rebecca Steffens Jenrow), and it continues to be cited by cranks and quacks who push pseudoscience and woo related to electromagnetic hypersensitivity (and producers of “shielding” devices). Said work includes e.g. a paper, co-authored with the aforementioned Tamara Mariea, on links between electromagnetic radiation and autism – work that has been amply cited by leading antivaccine activists such as Heidi Stevenson and Joseph Mercola (an ardent fan of Carlo’s), and which is discussed here

 

Another notable contribution is his 2006 theory – apparently dreamt up from thin air – on “Information Carrying Radio Waves (ICRW), which quickly became the catch-cry of anti-cellphone activists everywhere (Carlo himself promoted it by sending it to anti-cell-phone-tower activists Milt Bowling and Eileen O’Connor with “Privileged and Confidential — All rights Reserved” stamped on every page as a marketing ploy to suggest importance and urgency), and which predictably resurfaced in 2020 among the “5G is the cause of COVID” crowd; the paper itself – laughable from any scientific or professional perspective – was a clever piece of salesmanship and pseudoscientific technobabble. Carlo has also e.g. appeared on Good Morning America to spread the claim that Radiation Is Killing the Bees Despite the Cell Phone Industry’s Disinformation Campaign, his only actual evidence (i.e. beyond speculation and pseudoscientific technobabble) being a German study which, completely unrelatedly, showed that bees could be disoriented by radio signals and which also turned out not to be replicable. There is little in his portfolio that even remotely resembles scientific studies from Carlo’s hand, at least since 2000 – to be sure, he and his associates have published “findings” in various pseudojournals, such as the International Journal of Clinical Bioenergetics … which was run by BioPro Technologies and for which Carlo was both the Editor-in-Chief and peer-reviewer. His Institute for Healthful Adaptation has certainly advertised the undertaking of a number of studies, though the advertisement appears mostly to be a marketing strategy to sell products and attract funding.

 

Some of his organizations and projects, such as the Safe Wireless Initiative, which has accumulated a vast database of people who claim (anonymously) to have symptoms and/or illnesses related to or caused directly by EMR exposure; the Mobile Telephone Health Concerns Register (MTHCR); or the international Help for Wireless Victims network, which ostensibly helps people who suffer from the made-up “ElectroHyperSensitivity Syndrome (EHS)” and “Membrane Sensitivity Syndrome (MSS)”, might also still be active; we haven’t checked. But through his initiatives, Carlo has certainly become a person of influence, shaping court decisions and public policy. In 2007, for instance, he was invited before a Parliamentary committee in the UK (representing the activist group Radiation Research Trust), and his work has been used and cited by a variety of EU legislators and lobbying groups.

 

Lately, Carlo has promoted Memon, a “bionic instrument” based on pseudoscientific gobbledygook and designed to re-harmonize you and your environment from the harmful effects of mobile phones, WiFi and electromagnetic radiation in general. The technological foundation for the device is nebulous, but a core point apparently concerns the putative distinction between right-turning electromagnetic frequencies, which is good, and left-turning ones, which are destructive and carry pathogenic information’s [sic] – the “Memon device uses Information’s Polarizations Interference Chip Technology (IPICT) to sense an interference” and, “via a massive library of information’s [sic] stored within it, transform the pathogenic information’s by rotating them 180 degrees then reflecting them back out again,” thus cancelling them out. Oh, yes. And Carlo can certify that the device “is clearly positive efficient on each level of biological systems” and an “anti-oxidant’ and restorative for disrupted inter-cellular communication”, and that the mechanism of action “is both biologically mediated and direct energetic.

 

There is a decent, though older, portrait of George Carlo and his work (in six parts) here, here, here, here, here and here.

 

Diagnosis: One of the most influential, successful, dangerous and cynical promoters of pseudoscience and denialism in the world today. It remains unclear whether he actually believes any of the FUD-promoting materials he producers, but given that he might, he deserves an entry. And in any case it is a name you really should be familiar with, in case it ever pops up in any context.

 

Hat-tip: David Gorski @ SciencebasedMedicine

 

[It turns out that we have written about George Carlo before … we didn’t remember, but that is the reason for the ‘.5’ designation – the previous entry is here, and complements the present one]

Monday, May 1, 2023

#2642: Mike Cargile

The bizarre QAnon conspiracy theory complex remains astonishingly popular, and even has representatives in Congress. A lot more QAnon candidates have tried to run for Congress, but given that even many wild-eyed wingnuts are wary of the nonsense, these candidates’ efforts have generally not met with great success.

 

Mike Cargile, for instance. Cargile tried his hand in 2020 in California’s 35th Congressional District (and again in 2022), and won the endorsement of the California Republican Party until his QAnon affiliation became public knowledge – his anti-Black Facebook rants and memes, complete with the n-word, didn’t help either. Of course, Cargile didn’t just target Black people; he also suggested that Muslim members of Congress are working with terrorists, stated that “2 illegal aliens having an anchor baby does not produce an American” and suggested that LGBTQ people are leading to the end of days.

 

And Cargile’s QAnon association is not just some multiple-degrees-of-separation-like accusation; Cargile even has the QAnon slogan “Where We Go One We Go All” (WWG1WWA – we’re still not sure how QAnonites square their slogan with accusing other people of being sheeple) in his Twitter biography (together with #Oathkeeper), and his campaign was largely based on his pronouncement thatThe United States is being run by a satanic cabal of human traffickers and pedophile predators, working in conjunction other world leaders, to establish a one world order. I will do everything within my power to oppose this.” Cargile didn’thave a doubt that QAnon exists,” although he admitted that “what or who it is exactly, no one seems to be sure.” And although [t]here’s some fringe elements I don’t agree with,” he emphasized thata lot of it I agree with” and that he found the evidence – whatever he may mean by ‘evidence’ – compelling.

 

Indeed, Cargile is the full conspiracy package. He has claimed that the coronavirus is a “scamdemic” and “NOTHING compared to the diseases and plagues headed this way via the rats and the homeless” (not that he offered much of a political plan to help combat homelessness), and he praised Judy Mikovits’s deranged conspiracy flick Plandemic as “EXACTLY why I'm in this race! 

 

And Cargile was not the only 2020 QAnon candidate in California. Omar Navarro, for instance, who ran in the primary for the 43rd Congressional District, was proud of his QAnon allegiance: My relationship with this movement [QAnon] is to expose the dark human trafficking agenda in Hollywood and D.C. There were also at least:

 

-       Jamie Byers in CA-04, who unsuccessfully ran again in 2022 with WWG1WWA as one of his slogans

-       Erin Cruz in CA-36, who retweeted QAnon “info, and who, though she later acknowledged that the information from “Q” is “not 100 percent accurate, nevertheless described it as a “data source

-       Ignacio Cruz in CA-19, profiled here 

-       Billy Earley in CA-44, who ran on the WWG1WWA slogan and repeatedly posted QAnon videos; “mind-boggling” said Earley of their contents. Indeed.

-       Rhonda Furin in CA-45

-       Alison Hayden in CA-15, a special education teacher who considers QAnon “another news outlet”; she has frequently shared its various conspiracies on social media. “It’s digital soldiers amalgamating information – you wouldn’t otherwise know about various topics that are swirling the internet with a conservative viewpoint that supports the President,” said Hayden.

-       Patrice Kimbler in CA-36, a hardcore antivaccine activist who seems to support any antivaccine conspiracy theory involving the COVID-19 vaccines she can come across

-       Buzz Patterson in CA-07, who has univocally declared his support for QAnon (but also, of course, denied it

-       Nikka Piterman in CA-15 and CA-13, profiled here, who said that he doesn’t disavow QAnon “in any way” and that the “idea that there are groups of God-hating pedophiles isn’t far-fetched at all,” a sentiment that ought to lead you to question what he himself might be involved in.

-       DeAnna Lorraine Tesoriero in CA-12, who will receive her own entry, don’t worry.

-       Joanne Wright in CA-34, who actually at least initially received the California Republican Party endorsement, even while the background photo on her Twitter account featured a picture of Trump pulling up a curtain to show a “Q”. Wright also tweeted numerous QAnon videos and pushed various Seth Rich and COVID-19 conspiracy theories

 

Diagnosis: Utter failures at reason, thought, decency and humanity is no insurmountable barrier for political success; that’s hardly a novel insight, but the degree of deranged kookery that people like Cargile (almost) get away with is still stunning.