If nothing else, the Discovery Institute’s petition A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism nicely illustrates the bankruptcy of the DiscoTute anti-evolution campaigns (and
their Intelligent Design movement, which really is just an anti-evolution movement).
Of course, the value of appealing to petitions in discussing scientific
questions is one thing; another is that the signatories they actually got constitute
a motley crew at best, many of whom are non-scientists and few of whom are
actually experts in any relevant areas; and even if they were experts, which they aren't, they would in
any case only comprise a negligible fraction of working scientists in the fields. To
illustrate that, the National Center for Science Education initiated their own
tongue-in-cheek response, Project Steve,
a list of living scientists named “Steve” (or variants of the name) who support
evolution. As of 2012 the list contained 1187 signatures – as many as the total
number of signatories to the Discovery Institute list – of which two-thirds are
qualified biologists; and, as random searches quickly reveal, the Project Steve
signatories are overall far more consistently active scientists and researchers
with real credentials than the Discovery Institute list. To underscore that
point, the Discovery Institute’s list had 12 or 13 signatories whose names
would have qualified them for the Steve list as of 2012 (possibly a few more if you count middle names, which are usually not given on the Discovery list), of whom at least two
are non-scientists (Stephen Meyer and Stephen Cheesman), one a certified crackpot (Stephan Gift), and a single
one of whom is a biologist, C. Steven Murphree, who has later regretted his
involvement with the Discovery list and signed Project Steve instead. One
almost feel sorry for them.
Steven Gollmer is another “Steve” on the Discovery Institute
list, and a fairly typical entry. Gollmer does have a PhD in Atmospheric
Science from Purdue (which has little to do with evolution) and is currently affiliated
with Cedarville University,
a small Bob-Jones-University-like institution in Ohio that teaches young-earth-creationism and requires all
students to have a minor in Bible studies. Like most institutions of that kind,
Cedarville faculty is notoriously inbred (i.e. many of their “scientific”
faculty have their degrees from … Cedarville), but Gollmer is apparently an
exception. What about his scientific credentials? In line with the school’s
position Gollmer has declared that “[o]ur approach to science and origins is
based on the presupposition that our highest and ultimate authority is the
unchanging Word of God,” which effectively means that he rejects the science
part of it all. He has also been active in creationist attempts to impose lesson plans on the Ohio State Board of
Education, and is a signatory to the CMI list of scientists alive today who accept the biblical account of creation.
Diagnosis: He might have a degree, but Steven Gollmer is not a scientist, and he hates
science to the core of his being. Like so many of the signatories to that
Discovery Institute list.
"the National Center for Science Education initiated their own tongue-in-cheek response, Project Steve, a list of living scientists named “Steve” (or variants of the name) who support evolution."
ReplyDeleteI love it! Use the power of statistics to prove the logical fallacy of argumentum ad populum.