You
remember the Texas Board of Education,
of course. In their creationist heydays, various nationally famous denialists
and local lunatics would both launch attacks on biology, physics and history in
manners that would draw national and even international attention, but the side
of science generally won out in the end. When the State Board of Education‘s
public hearing on new science textbooks for Texas public schools finally began in 2013,
the creationists were unable to mount any serious attacks anymore. So all
looked well for a while – until it became clear that oil and gas industry
interests had instead decided to attack the only environmental science textbook
up for adoption by the state board.
So during
the hearings Becky Berger, who identified herself a geologist and oil and gas
professional, tried to argue that high schools shouldn’t teach environmental
science classes at all. And during the hearings she launched a rabid attack on the environmental science textbook under consideration, claiming that it is
filled with factual errors on topics like pollution potentially caused by fracking
and the problem of carbon emissions. The attack was somewhat weakened by the
fact that she provided no actual written documentation to back up her claims,
and failed to even produce a list of the alleged errors so that the publisher
could respond to her claims. Her attacks are discussed in some detail here.
The state’s official review teams had not identified any
factual errors in the textbook. Nevertheless, some board members thought that
Berger (who had not been part of the review process) was more credible. Of course,
Berger somehow didn’t remember
to tell the board that she is a Republican candidate for the Texas Railroad
Commission, which regulates the state’s oil and gas industry, information that
would have been strangely relevant.
She
wasn’t alone. Throughout the day of the hearings, various wingnut
activists and websites had been urging “grassroots” to call on the state board
to reject the science textbooks up for adoption, especially the environmental
science textbook. Honorable mention to Alice Linahan of the for-profit political outfit Voices Empower, who argued that the
textbooks were a threat to Texas’ oil/natural gas industry.
Diagnosis:
Denialist wingnut. Yes, another one, and Berger is not afraid to use subversion
and trickery to get her way.
No comments:
Post a Comment