A.k.a. Silver Ravenwolf (chosen)
A.k.a. $ilver Ravingwolf
Her chosen alias might give her away rather promptly, and
Trayer is a prolific neopagan author of many books for teenagers attracted to neopaganism (To Ride a Silver Broomstick, Teen Witch, and so on). As such she is
the starting point for many neopagans (although given the daftness of her
chosen alias one wonders how even deluded teenagers can get through them), and
many young neopagans thus feel some attachment to her ideas. Apparently,
however, older neopagans consider her work to be historically revisionist,
overly simplistic, or as having borrowed too much from other religions. Her
other nickname is derived from the suspicion that Trayer is not really motivated
by sincere religious convictions.
We’ll leave the complaints of other neopagans to other neopagans. Reasonable people will probably take issue with Trayer’s
promotion of magic in a manner seemingly inspired by the law of attraction (or prayer): that invoking the proper spells or using the proper
herbs/candles/metals will make all of your problems go away. According to
Trayer, however, neopagans are in fact just practicing science (no, she has no
idea). In To Ride a Silver Broomstick,
the claim is “[I]t is my personal opinion that most people are attracted to the
Craft not by its religious content, but by its scientific and technological
allure.” In MindLight, almost
surprisingly unsophisticated quantum woo is invoked to back up the law of attraction – yes, you, too, can use quantum physics to get whatever you want. It has to do
with energy.
I do, however,
wonder what she means by “[t]here is NO difference between Wicca and
WitchCraft. Anyone who tells you there is a difference is experimenting in the
theory of Occum’s Razor.”
A critique of her work can be found here (can't vouch for the source, but may be fine).
Diagnosis: Actually rather boring for this kind of crazy,
partially given the nagging suspicion that Trayer isn’t being completely
upfront about her motives. Still, she does continue to exert some influence
over the weak of will (teenagers in particular), and it is certainly not
benevolent.
No comments:
Post a Comment