A.k.a. Drutakarma Drasa
Benjamin Creme is Scottish but so magnificently insane that you need to check him out. Michael A Cremo
seems to try his best not to be overshadowed by said amazing Scotsman. Cremo, a
hinduist, is a “vedic creationist”, hardcore proponent of woo, and even more
intensely hardcore conspiracy theorist. His most famous book is Forbidden Archaeology (written with
Richard Thompson, to be covered later), which promotes his rather idiosyncratic
take on creationism: humans (homo sapiens) have lived on earth, unchanged, for
billions and billions of years. Of course, given the existence of that branch
of scientific inquirey called “archaeology”, Cremo & Thompson’s claim
requires a conspiracy. And indeed, we get one – Cremo and Thompson pull it out
over 900 pages of what amounts to nonsense and feebly helpless ignorance of
geology, archaeology, or evolution, instead pushing an impressive array of
pseudo-archaeological and fraudulent “fossil” evidence of the kind that is so
stupid that even your stock creationist may stop referring to it after a while because
it’s too silly (says a bit). It is discussed here.
The abridged version of their book, The Hidden
History of the Human Race, is reviewed here.
The general idea, which researchers presumably happily cover
up while cashing their fat research grant checks, is that “[w]e did not evolve up from matter; instead we devolved, or
came down, from the realm of pure consciousness, spirit.” Cremo suggests that
before we ask “where did human beings come from?” we should ask “[w]hat is a
human being?” His answer is that it is a combination of matter, mind, and
consciousness (or spirit). Which is an assertion displaying little
understanding of matter, mind, consciousness, or evidence. At least he predicts that his book will be ridiculed (a sudden dim flash of insight there) since all great ideas always are,
despite the demonstrable fact that great ideas have, contrary to popular
belief, no more than exceedingly rarely (perhaps never) had to go through a
period of ridicule before they have been accepted. Cremo explicitly admits that
his governing strategy is confirmation bias here (“[w]hen operating from a different metaphysical perspective, I seem to see the
evidence in a different light … was surprised to find there was so much
evidence that is consistent with the Puranas”).
Cremo has no scientific education (his credentials are discussed
here),
and his associate membership of the Bhaktivedanta (“specializing in
history and philosophy of science”), the scientific research branch of the
International Society for Krishna Consciousness,
doesn’t count.
He has, however, appeared on TV – More precisely in Charlton Heston’s legendary “The Mysterious Origins of Man”.
Diagnosis: Confirmation bias is not rigorous testing or
evaluation of hypotheses, but Cremo would never know the difference. His
screeds are of the kind that to a rational mind reads as well when the font is set
to wingdings.
I'll bet you are one of those people who believe the universe is a Perpetual Motion Machine like Hawking and his gang of delusionary thinkers are trying to do. Or I bet you think Potassium and Sodium ions actually generate the electricity of the Autonomic Nervous System. If the academic community was not so busy telling lies to support their deluded thinking maybe they could see more than their projections in physics and other 'speculative' sciences like psychology.
ReplyDeleteBecause of such dogmatic comment on any evidence presented as an alternative theory, we cast ourselves away from getting to the truth. As the proverb says, 'you don't see what you see, you see what you recognize!' If scientists would have been doing a real clean job then probably the world would have been a better place, rid of all vices, such as, smoking, alcoholism, genetically modified foods, pollution of every kind etc. Most often in the job principle of being hired, they no more work for truth, but for corporate's coveted interests at the cost of truth. There are very rare broad-minded scientists who work for the truth, very carefully separating real from false. I personally have read this book and found it to be very comprehensive in it's presentation. Which if needed to be evaluated, it should be done on the firm ground of evaluating the evidences directly without any prejudice.
ReplyDelete