Jon Rappoport is a deliriously insane “independent
researcher” and blogger. According to his bio, he “has lectured extensively all
over the US on the question: Who runs the world and what can we do about it?”
For the last decade, however, he has “operated largely away from the mainstream”
because, as he puts it, “[m]y research was not friendly to the conventional
media.” Indeed. His independent research encompasses “deep politics,
conspiracies, alternative health, the potential of the human imagination, mind control,
the medical cartel,
symbology, and solutions to the takeover of the planet by hidden elites.”
He is, for instance, a germ theory denialist,
and in his post “Germ theory and depopulation” (discussed here)
he argues that “[i]n general, so-called contagious diseases are caused, not by
germs, but by IMMUNE SYSTEMS THAT ARE TOO WEAK TO FIGHT OFF THOSE GERMS” (yes,
the capitalization is in the original). Indeed, “GERMS ARE A COVER STORY. What
do they cover up? The fact that immune systems are the more basic target for depopulation and debilitation of populations.” The main tool is of course vaccines, which
are weapons the nefarious powers that be use to kill off, well, it is a bit
hard to see, partially because Rappoport’s post is mostly all-caps from there.
At least HIV is a cover story as well.
He has a similar screed on flu vaccines on whale.to if that’s the kind of stuff you
fancy reading. It is barely grammatical, but at least he gets his enthusiastic
anger across rather well.
Currently Rappoport seems to write on various topics for InfoWars.
Recently, for instance, Rappoport and InfoWars dubbed Rep. Tim Murphy’s bill seeking to reform the way the government addresses
mental health services a “diabolical legislative package,” since Rappoport
thought the legislation would require almost all children to take “psychiatric
meds,” and that the bill will ultimately give the federal government “a
monopoly of the mind.” Yeah, that’s the way he rolls.
Diagnosis: Hysterically crazy; and his influence is probably
not quite as limited as his level of crazy should suggest.
I love this!!!!
ReplyDeleteWhy do you "love this"? Do you think name calling is an effective form of intellectual debate?
DeleteHas anyone taken on this man in a debate? I would love to see someone deal with his arguments.
ReplyDeleteWhy debate when you can simply slander? Debate is not the modern way. Too demanding, really.
Deletethey will LOSE in a debate.
DeleteExactly! Rappaport writes well and this slandering article simple reinforces that he is probably correct
DeleteWhy don't you form an actual rebuttal instead of calling someone crazy? It actually makes you look unintelligent. This guy is actually right and the reason these people are able to get away with the things they are getting away with is because they have convinced you that anyone who opposes your oppressor, you will dismiss and isolate. Look up instructional videos from the 50s that were shown in schools. They were made by a corporation called McGraw-Hill. They so large they have divide their business into different units, telecommunications, banks, schools, agriculture, metals, publishing, and so on. Psychiatric medications have metals in them. There's a group of carefully selected scientists isolated at each pole. You can move metal with magnets can you not? All our food is enriched with metals, the lines in the skies you see from planes are metal. Seriously, do some frigging research and make connections. These days if you are able to focus on more than one thing they call it a disease and alter you through drugs. Or if someone cannot follow along with what you're saying they call you schizophrenic.
ReplyDeleteCome on people, keep up. Look into it.
Right on Kasey Olivia! Interconnected thinking, joining the 'dots'..yes.
DeleteAnd 'fetal tissue'.
DeleteAhhh...can you hear the loons? It's a beautiful sound....shhhh
DeleteIndeed. Perhaps you are the actual loon. Have you ever considered the science,or should I say lack of science upon which Virology is based?Clearly you haven't. Richard Feynman - you probably have no idea who he is - had a term for it. He called it Cargocult science. It has all the trappings of science, but when you analyse it ,it becomes apparent fairly quickly that quackery is what lies behind it...and a lot of money and corrupt corporatism.
Delete@ Kevin: I was Feynman's personal assistant in the 1980's and you are 100% correct. A good portion of my job was to run interference between Richard and the administration/management at Cal Tech, JPL and "elsewhere" in the Black World, to "point out general BS whenver you see it", to "Think outside the box", to "Run contrary to the flow" to "Give me approximate answers that work right here, right now" and "Basically just do the impossible at all times, don't worry, it's not hard, just don't take anything THEY say too seriously because THEY are petty, self serving and stupid little worker bees"...
DeleteThis is yellow journalism at it's most despicable. Ad hominem, straw men, no cogent refutation of his research, evidence, or arguments.
DeleteYou sir, would benefit immensely from reading his matrix revealed series. What is with you modern blogging people? Seriously, is your cognitive dissonance that strong? I find this type of hit piece laughable amateuristic.
You don't hold a flake to the reading inferno that is Jon Rappaport.
Dig a little deeper, shed your appeals and prostration to authority. Your mind and spirit will thank you
You are absolutely correct. Clearly, this site is for those who are brain-washed sheeple, what Stalin called "useful idiots"!
DeleteYep 22ct, Olympic Standard loon. He's just read enough science to sound off without understanding a word. Anti Vaxxer, conspiracy nut (the world's pretty much run by a Brotherhood apparently. His qualifications for all this? A BA in Philosophy at a small university. Science was obviously too difficult for him to grasp.
DeleteJon Rappoport is clearly a) psychotic or b) he understands that there are a lot of really stupid people in the world and he has made a nice living off of exploiting their unbelievable ignorance and gullibility.
DeleteWhat I said to a typical communist today applies to this website: "Standard petty communist irrelevance. It's just pathetic seeing people feigning superiority with such drivel because they are incapable of an intelligent argument. I'm sorry that you and many other people I know are on the wrong side. It's not just the people you disagree with whose liberty and livelihoods are being destroyed by communist traitors of whom you approve and emulate. It's millions and millions of people all over the world, regardless of what they believe."
DeleteThese comments restore my faith in humankind
DeleteOh and let's not forget the mercury in your precious vaccines.
ReplyDeleteDid you know that the CIA once posed as public health officials in the south and gave black people syphallis by pretending to give them free health care?
Free flu shots at Rite Aid everyone!
Fuq that.
#nutter
DeleteThere was never a good justification for using thimerosal in vaccines. The ehtyl mercury dissociates in aqueous solution and binds to the proteins in the vaccines. The sulfhydryl groups are very strong mercury ligands, stronger than almost anything. It is a well-known chemical fact that sulfur forms the tightest bond with mercury out of any element. Just look up the dissociation constant of cysteine and mercury.
DeleteThis is the main reason why it is not even a very good preservative. Molecules like phenol and phenoxyalcohol are much better in this regard since they don't break down. These two preservatives inhibit DNA replication in growing bacteria.
The other reason not to use thimeroal is that it is way more toxic to humans than bacteria. It also accumulates and is difficult to get rid of. The ethylmercury binds to the methionine and cysteine groups of enzymes and other proteins interfering with them and sometimes denaturing them.
They removed this inexcusable toxin from vaccine for the most part. This proves my point that it was never necessary to begin with. what justification do they have for using it for 80 years when it could have been supplanted by the cheaper and safer phenol this entire time?
All we get are insultingly stupid answers the the CDC and their propagandists. Can you come up with a halfway decent rationalization?
I bet you can't. If there was one I would have heard it by now.
My reason is that they made sure to keep it in their toxic and worthless flu vaccines and push them hard on pregnant women, new borns and the elderly, exactly the most sensitive populations to be irreparably harmed by the introduction of nano tubules of incredibly toxic potent Mercury and aluminum. We are not human to the powers that be. bWe are livestock animals to be exploited and slaughtered at their whim. The drugs, educational system, consumer culture and enforced conformity are all mechanisms of submission and control.
DeleteThe whole nonsense about thimerosal got started because of Wakefield's fraudulent autism study, where he was paid $674,000 by lawyers who wanted to sue the vaccine industry and faked his results. It's since been debunked and he's lost his medical license. The sad part is suckers still fall for it. Now thimerosal has been pulled from most vaccines and we get to pay out the nose for single dose vials. I'm guessing those that are so against being immunized haven't taken much coursework in microbiology or pathophysiology, or worked in an environment where they run the risk of exposure to pathogens, not that there's not plenty of risk on the street. As a registered nurse I can confidently say that a few micrograms of thimerosal is far safer than many of the bacteria you can encounter and anyone who says otherwise is a complete loon.
DeleteWakefield was cleared as was Walker-Smith. Check out Georgia Guidestones on Google then you get the picture
DeleteI have been very damaged by thimerisol, so fuck off, bochisattva smith!!!!
DeleteThank you, Bodhisattva Smith, that was an excellent comment buried among all these anti-vax goon rants.
DeleteI'm with you Kasey! I think maybe G.D. has been affected by the vaccines he's taken.
ReplyDeleteDon'the know how I got on Jon's e-mail list, but I get more content than I can keep up with... I share Jon's healthy mistrust of ever enlarging institutional momentum, so my curiosity is easily tickled by his topical content... still, I find myself questioning this mans ability to differentiate perception from reality. He teaches that private imagination is the most trustworthy reality, because, in his mind, the trajectory of tangible reality has been hijacked by strong-willed conspiritors who want to keep the masses dull of mind, so as to make it easier for them to strategically steer our allegiance into their tightly controlled schemes. It seems Jon has withdrawn himself into sort of functional paranoia where he seeks pure self-empowerment through imagination only. He evangelizes for the private world of "imagination" - where self-determined realities are birthed. These imagine-driven "realities" cannot be molested by any of the nefarious conspirators operating in what he calls the "matrix" dimension. In summation, I think Jon has been deeply influenced by ancient mystic philosophies of mind-over-matter; but he replaces 'mind' with 'imagination' - a twist that urges readers to believe that imagination is more powerful than matter. He venerates human imagination as GOD... a GOD without any guidelines or boundaries. According to him, the universe of the mind has no boundaries, therefore creations drawn by the imaginative mind are more powerful than fixed forces at work in the physical universe. His equation is simple: UNBOUND is greater than BOUND, therefore UNTAPPED IMAGINATION is greater than ESTABLISHED REALITY. He does not recognize the error in this premise, so he keeps adding to the narrative. All this makes him an interesting person, but I find his emphasis unbalanced in favor of delusion. Truth is, one does not have to unplug from reality in order to maximize the untapped power of imagination. Genius is wasted if it excites no one but self.
ReplyDeleteI do not think Jon is delusional at any level. He has uncovered the truth about GM crops, fake viruses, and how valuable depopulation has become to certain individuals. If you think that new diseases with unknown origin, radical increases of birth defects, radical increases of autism, and other unexplainable diseases are the cause of nothing, then you are the one that is delusional.
DeleteWhen doctors have no explanation for a newly found disease or unexplainable reasons for a patient's illness, they give them pharmaceuticals. Prior to the mass increase in GM crops, disease was rather simple to indentify. Anyone that cannot connect the dots is part of the experiment. I have kept myself healthy over the years with natural remedies, clean food, exercise, and a keen eye to stay away from suggestive gimmicks. I consider flu shots, new vaccines, GMO ridden foods, newly marketed medications, tap water, and other highly publicized and pushed products to be harmful to the human body. The individuals that I know who use all of these products are in bad shape. They have fibromyalgia (unknown disease), rheumatoid arthritis (newly made-up disease), mental disorders (recently discovered), overweight/extremely bloated (very typical from GM posioning),loss of memory, and severe depression (formerly very upbeat individuals). There is no way the correllation between GM foods and sickness can be nullified. Scientists from around the world have verified Monsanto products and their GM crops cause several illnesses.
You, as a pessimistic, unconcerned individual have nothing to offer the people who are unimformed and uneducated about the evil individuals in large governments that take bribes (contributions via lobbying) are corrupting the natural balance of God's creation.
If you are not part of the solution, then you are part of the problem!
Well, Jon is on the right side of about 80% of the issues. the other 20% are waky tobaccy. After reading several of his rambling articles, I have come to conclusion that the man is or was clearly a genius, but he's lost his mind. there are dozens of independent investigative journalists out there doing better work, but Jon's contribution is that, despite is obvious need for so,escort of medical intervention, there is a fine journalistic mind and a deep sense of humanity driving his work. His "news articles" which are really more of a blog, since he seems to have no regard for his chosen mediums strict credos of impartiality, is that of a rambling but neatly folded up compendium of other sources, credible for he most part,vino have written the careful and well regarded articles for the respected alternative journalistic websites. Jon's is, unfortunately, not one of them, nor will it ever be, until he gets what I suspect is a bipolar condition properly looked after. I do wish him well.
Deletedon't forget the "(guess what?)" thats what..but why? because i said soo.the new consensus
Delete"Barely grammatical"; did you mean to say
ReplyDelete"grammatically incorrect"? SOMEONE is quite
illiterate, here, and it "ain't" Jon.
I've read a number of Jon's books over the years. He does not seem crazy to me. His discussions on imagination led me to spontaneously paint 5 paintings a few weeks ago. I'm not a painter! I have also fact checked his claims to the best of my ability and have found him to be accurate.
ReplyDeleteThere is only one loon here and it's the blogger. Jon Rappoport's analyses of the HIV and Ebola hoaxes are clearly and cogently argued. You will notice that the blogger here instantly reverts to insults, the tactics of a child. He/she is incapable of arguing a rational case. I'm not surprised though, because when it comes to arguing the case for HIV/AIDS it really is a lost cause. The theory has more holes than a collander
ReplyDeleteNobody can rationally defend the HIV/AIDS hypothesis. Duesberg and the Perth Group have made it clear that the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is a fraud.
DeleteThis is easier to prove than most frauds. There are so many holes that nobody seems to mention AIDS anymore; they just want to let this one fade from the public's memory.
I find John Rappoport to be a highly gifted writer with accuracy and passion. This blogger is a nutter.
ReplyDeleteI quite agree—especially with this blogger being a nutter. You can tell how proud he is about what he writes by his extensive profile. LOL! Here's an idea for you G.D., why don't you make all those you consider to be an “American Loon” two feet tall like Oliver Crangle did in the Twilight Zone episode “Four O'Clock?” Be forewarned though, you just might become two feet tall yourself. ;)
DeleteWell, GD just attacks anyone who doesn't agree with the government narrative, or anyone who isn't atheist. Facts aren't important to him (which is why he uses sources like Quackwatch and RationalWiki).
DeleteWhen Jon goes esoteric I tend to tune out but his natural/alternative health information is exactly right. I am a retired medical research analyst and I agree with everything he has presented regarding the predatory medical industry. Simply following the well documented history of the Rockefeller clan and Big Pharma is sufficient to understand what has happened and confirm Jon's information. Moreover, look up the credentials of Catherine Austen Fitts, and ask her opinion of Jon. They are great friends. He is very respected by everyone who knows anything.
ReplyDeleteThe blogger is the loon. Jons one of the most readable cogent well informed writers it has been my pleasure to read in the blogosphere. GD stoopid might be a good suffix, to your initials. LOL
ReplyDeleteFirst and last time reading this crap. As the wise old statement goes, don't argue with stupid people! They bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. That's all the time I will spend on GD.
ReplyDeleteJon rappoport is only human, but quite a bright one for certain.
Unabelievable1 We're getting nutter Rappoport on climate denial and apparently he has a good few followers in these comments. It's a terrible waste of time, something we don't have a lot of these days on climate. Time will out the dangerous delusion, but time is running out. Time to pay attention to the world around you and notice the evidence is piling up.
ReplyDeleteI'm not going to try to respond, just wanted to thank the author for identifying yet another person working against our human future.
By the way, anti-vaxxers: congratulations on bringing measles back. Way to go!
Who says that measles is back? It's probably propaganda from the pro-vaccine crowd.
DeleteI'm not as smart as most commenters here but the commonality that I have noticed here is that the naysayers just call people names or insult and the positive commenters concerning Mr. Rappaport give actual evidence and reason. I have never even read S. Alsinsky's book 'Rules for Radicals' but I can watch it play itself out in this thread.
ReplyDeleteSeems I have found yet another false "De-bunking"/"Skeptic" sites along the lines of the laughable Michael Shermer's and James Randi's of the World, the difference being Mike and Jim KNOW who they are working for and why and you are (apparently) just another miss-educated millennial that most foolishly believes in the conspiracy theories of the MSM and political establishment, while discounting the actual conspiracies that (for lack of a better term) the "TPTB" don't want people to think about, or more concisely: The people, powers and control mechanisms of society.
ReplyDeleteWhat a good little worker drone you are for the hive, you attempt to attack John with nothing but blathering, in-factual (Zero facts actually) un-founded, verbal diarrheatic slander, and of course fall flat on your face because YOU OFFER NOTHING of factual logic to support your stance.
Your first mistake is ridiculing Alex Jones/Infowars because Infowars is a NEWS AGGREGATOR. They comb the MSM and filter out the BS and investigate the germane. Alex posts MULTIPLE cites/links for every stance he posits. He is the ONLY one who actually does this and it is why in over 20 years of operation he has only had to post 4 retractions which is less than WAPO and other major MSM sites are forced to post each week. The MSM hates him for this and continually quotes him out of context or simply makes up quotes in order to attempt to ridicule him and each time they do so they lose a few more viewers (Look at how he destroyed Megan Kelley when she attempted to "take him down", most amusing).
You should watch John's presentation on mind control, because you are quite obviously a victim of that which he speaks of:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_noA7-qY26A
I love Orca whale!! do they really go that high out water?
DeleteKaren, Love your Orca whale! Do they jump that high out of the water?
DeleteIf youre gonna mock him as "barely grammatical" you shouldnt probably write in a way that leads me to conclude english is not your first language
ReplyDeleteNow you are a fine satirist. I assume you put the numerous errors in spelling and grammar in your comment deliberately to illustrate "Muphry's Law". But, as a word adventurist, I can assure you that "barely grammatical" is fine even for stodgy English teachers, who blanch at my wild literary palette. Look it up, you'll see "grammatical' has multiple meanings and its synonyms indicate its wide range of possible uses. That said, I gotta fess that as a contrarian skeptic science nut I think people like Rappaport give my ilk a bed rep. No fool, like an old fool. Though some have told me, "It takes one to know one." Na na na na!
DeleteLol, the only thing this site is good for is a research tool for finding alternative data points / points of view and making up your own conclusions in search of personal veracity.
ReplyDeleteAh, the intelligible, the nutters, and the just plain ignorant peoples commenting on this site is grand entertainment; how do they find these people and what qualifies them as loons? I would love to hear how they come to this loon conclusion
ReplyDeleteThe only "loon" here is the individual who created and maintains this 'blog.
ReplyDeleteHe is the real deal. Go do some research. Trolls are everywhere on the internet to discredit true journalism or ideas
ReplyDeleteI think we know who the loon is here and it ain't Jon. Tearing down other people's work is the easiest thing in the world; putting yourself out there and your citations is quite another.
ReplyDelete“The motive behind criticism often determines its validity. Those who care criticize where necessary. Those who envy criticize the moment they think that they have found a weak spot.”
so the best you can do is bully and elementary school name calling? wow, you showed him real good.
ReplyDeleteThe problem here is what I refer to as feel-think. This is having a reflexive conditioned emotional response which then generates the subsequent thoughts. This process which virtually everyone is subject to results in something other than objective evaluation. See Conscious Neuroplastic Mediation: The Next Step in the Evolution of Human Consciousness for a full explanation of this incredibly destructive process and how to learn to avoid it.
ReplyDeleteThe Bewildered herd while remaining bewildered believes itself otherwise.
ReplyDeletehey, this site is a great resource. thank you!
ReplyDeleteThe first thing you true believers need to ask yourselves is why a grown man would use a 35 year old photograph of himself on his website. Today he looks like a homeless guy who has been muttering to himself for the last decade. He looks like Howard Hughes when Howie went straight up nuts and wore kleenex boxes as slippers and grew his hair and fingernails to ridiculous lengths. The man is a fraud, a joke, and utterly without two brain cells to rub together. Send him your money though. He digs that.
ReplyDeleteYou sound vapid and ignorant, go read a book.
ReplyDeleteI had been researching virology, AIDS and gene sequencing when the 'pandemic' started which only made me go into it m7ch deeper. I had never heard of Jon until a few months ago and I must say he's one of the most impressive journalists I've ever come across, the guy is clearly gifted, I realized that when I watched him interview doctors and talk about virology and AIDS, he knows just as much as anyone in the field, he's done the research to the deepest level and understand that most of the field is based on 'cargo science', not many journalists would have gone the length, or would have the brain power to go the length he has gone.
ReplyDeleteHe clearly says SarsCov2 does not exist. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/03/jon-rappoport/my-original-position-on-the-non-existent-virus/
ReplyDeleteMaybe he was good in the past. I suspect affiliates of Alex Jones to be disinfo agents. I strongly suspect Andrew Kaufman (the virus doesn't exist, cure appendicitis with an enemy) as a disinfo agent. People should be cautious. The left loves to name call. But as big tech further weaponizes, the sites that run "the virus doesn't exist" articles will get shut down. I predict.
"viruses don't exist" is biological "flat earth".
Many other doctors, virologists and microbiologist agree with Jon's position. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is just one of them, and he explains his scientific viewpoint at this link=> https://rumble.com/vfpgoh-dr.-bhakdi-interview.html
ReplyDeleteThis website should be called "Encyclopedia Written by American Loons"
ReplyDeleteI think you need to have a new entry and add yourself. This is clearly propaganda designed to discredit those who speak the truth, those whom you clearly do not, cannot, understand with your limited vision. It is you who is the child.
ReplyDelete