Laura Magdalene Eisenhower is Ike’s great granddaughter and completely batshit insane. According to herself, she is a “soul-reaching teacher and healer, recognized by clients, psychics and spiritual societies, as a living global oracle and true archetype of Sophia-Magdalene on Earth,” who “has masterfully woven together the esoteric and alchemical aspects of nature with our ancient roots, the present world, and our future potential. [… She] has been on an intense world soul journey of the labyrinth through the many faces of the Goddess (http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Goddess_religion). With great passion and courage, she is helping to return sacred union (Christ Sophia).” Most of that is borrowed from the biography of her given in connection with her participation at the 2011 Dolphins and Teleportation Symposium - Andrew Basiago was there as well, and you really do have to visit their website). She seems to have come to public attention as a brave whistleblower when she exposed her attempted recruitment by a secret governmental Mars colony project, the purpose of which was to provide a survival civilization for the human race on Earth in the event of a planned (HAARP or bio-weapon induced) or natural cataclysm (solar flares) that would depopulate the Earth. (Discussed here)
It is a little bit sad, really. She apparently really, really, wants to be as important and influential as her ancestor and when the dream of political influence was thwarted, then, well, in her own words: “My great-grandfather President Ike, who was also the Army general who led the Allied Forces to victory over Hitler, battled evil corrupt powers on Earth and took on some of the most challenging scenarios in history. As I grew up, I could sense that I was completing this battle that has ancient roots. When Hitler died and the Nazis lost power – the entities including those that were ET/Extraterrestrial did not. They continued to find hosts and create agreements with people who were a part of the races of the patriarch and Global Elite – who want to run things through fear tactics, control and the suppression of Sophia or the essence of the Divine Feminine.” What a pity mankind has thus far failed to recognize how Laura is special, too – as special as Ike, having built upon Ike’s efforts to reach even farther heights.
She marked the 50th anniversary of President Eisenhower’s famous Farewell Address by predicting the coming collapse of the Military-Industrial Complex and a global transformation driven by enlightened unity consciousness. It is unclear whether she thinks the prophecy has been fulfilled.
Diagnosis: Astoundingly delusional, and no, Laura: you are not a whistleblower. You are crazy. But probably harmless.
I'm not so sure about not being a whistleblower...I mean, if I were the one in charge of recruiting people for a secret Mars colony, Laura Mag would be right at the top of my list. Who better to save the human race? LOL!ReplyDelete
I hate to say it but she reminds me of someone who I knew that was a heroin addict. Hope she gets help from an doctor (here on Earth preferably).Delete
LAURA IS THE REAL DEAL...TOO BAD SO MANY IN OUR COLLECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS SUFFER FROM TERMINAL SELF INDUCED IGNORANCE AND THE INABILITY TO WANT TO ACTUALLY RESEARCH AND CRITICALLY THINK FOR THEMSELVES. THANK YOU LAURA...WE MUST REMEMBER THERE WILL ALWAYS BE THOSE ON THEIR OWN RUNG OF THE SPIRITUAL LADDER...Delete
This comment has been removed by the author.ReplyDelete
As a former reader of conspiracy theorists such as David Ike, Stichin, jones, etc., I became very tiresome of their theories (though amusing) when they could not back up their statements with credible evidence or scientific facts. Where are your facts that such technology exists? Please explain how it works if you are as familiar with it as you claim? Please explain how alchemy works because, to my knowledge, the only way to change an atom or molecule is to add protons to it, and that, in itself, takes a tremendous amount of energy, and also, precise mathematical equations combined with an extensive knowledge of quantum physics. In other words, though not theoretically impossible, it's very difficult and scientists have been trying to do so for centuries. I'm not bashing you. I am just a skeptic, and I am sure you can appreciate healthy skepticism.Delete
Thing is, as a healthy skeptic, you have to admit the technology already exists. I mean we went to the moon in a tin can filled with liquid oxygen and a pocket calculator and that was 50 years ago. You see, in this day and age a real skeptic, one who honestly balances up all the various factors against each other and looks into the facts of a situation, can, in reguards to Mar's, only reach one conclusion / question, that being "why havn't we done it yet?" We know we can support life articially for longer than the mission would take, we know the destination has all the resources we could ever need to set up a base camp. It in fact would have been easier to send a manned mission to Mar's than it was to build and set up the ISS, so I ask you again, why havn't we done it yet, officially anyway?Delete
Keep doing what you do, Laura! Love your work!Delete
I think you hit the nail on the head Laura. The key word is "ignorance". People in the top secret military community know so much more than the average person who never has contact or knowledge of any of these things. So because of that, they sit there and laugh. They can't believe something that they've never even heard about. But simply making fun of someone as a reaction to this is indeed childish and immature. It's one thing to ask questions and another to be disrespectful. People don't yet understand that some things can't be physically proven to them. When someone gets a Reiki session and feels relaxed and their back pain goes away, how can anything be physically proven to someone else that it actually happened? We have gotten to the point in our society where no one ever believes an eyewitness to anything anymore. Everything must be on a video and even then they might claim photo-shop. So what standard of "proof" can be used to prove anything anymore? I just decided one day that I believe you. It's just a "feeling" and I can't prove anything either. It's just a decision I made and I'm good with it.Delete
I just found this blog, how glorious it is to sit back and with poor grammar and spelling skills, disparage people you haven't researched. I guess it gets ad hits and that's what counts. Laura can be understood by those who can intellectually and with mathematical proof, bridge the gap that materialistic science has ignored.Delete
This is a well written blog posting, written with concise language and clever innuendos. Had +lauramagdalene been trained in the diplomacy that she claims to have exercised as a "recruiter", she would have the language skills to put forth her argument and rebuttal.Delete
People without the intellect or capacity to counter an argument resort to using insults and offensive language. They also resort to transferring their anger onto their opponents, which effectively clouds up any attempt to present a concise rebuttal.
The conspiracies she proposes does not add up very well, If she invented the stories, she did not have the scientific comprehension to construct a massively mathematically and economically coherent story. She also lacks the professionalism to effectively deliver the myth she had created.
If her story were true, and if she truly had actually "seen things", she would have applied her licence towards being more subtle and more skillful as well as being more careful in reaching out to her audience, rather than a direct assault approach she has been taking.
This comment has been removed by the author.Delete
I read up on her as my brother has become enamoredvwith her and other conspiracy theorists. She really has nothing of substance to say. In one interview she claims she was being attacked but provides no details of what, who or whete. There is never any specifics just rambling generalities. Then when answering the above author she gets angry. Another red flag that she is an emotionally distressed person not the spiritual guru she wants you to believe she is.Delete
Hear! Hear! Wow someone sane on this thing.Delete
You probably wont approve of my comment, cause you can't take the shit that you dish out.ReplyDelete
I don't doubt anything you say Laura, Cause, I've had many strange experiences in my life, That I can't even define.Delete
Keep up the great work.
Wow. For someone who is a spiritual healer and highly advanced, you certainly take offence easily. And your response is even more so evolved. NOT! If you can't respond in strength, don't respond at all..Delete
Do you kiss your Ascended Master with that mouth?Delete
Nothing wrong with having emotions when having to deal with low life’s. Im not all love and light and never said I was. When your character is being attacked and you are being treated in such a manner and people are influenced by such a page, yeah I am going to say something. I just do my mission, I don’t do it for money and work with some of the most serious cases of MK-ultra victims, human trafficking victims and those who who subjected to Satanic ritual abuse. I am human too and have my traumas. This isn’t about fame. It’s sick what a joke this is for so many people and that this is what you offer the world, making it a joke — mistreating and being grossly disrespectful to someone putting a Lot on the line to help the human race. Then you act like you have the qualifications to diagnose my mental health or act like I’m supposed to be so highly evolved and take being spit on. I’ve done that before and so I have the right to defend myself. I don’t give a shit what you make of that. Enjoy staying trapped in the karmic grid for being such a lower form of human. Just simple integrity goes along way. Someone directed my attention to this again today. As you put me down and how I express myself, it’s clear in your responses that your pathetic egos are hanging on for dear life to some level of self worth that is built on masking your insecurities is much as you can. Do something of value instead of making the world uglier or harder than it already is. I laugh but pity you. Bullying is a sad form of human and ridicule people like me all you want, see where that gets you!!Delete
Laura, I applaud for responding. Yet remember when you respond to these jerks you only empower them more. Keep doing what you do and getting the message out there. It take tremendous courage in a world full of sleeping souls. Any attempt to disturb their sleep is met with swift and awful retaliation. To their defense their are 100s of charlatans and dis-informationists out there that put out false info to the universe for the sake of profit/ self gain. Those folks will be met by the karma they've created. But you, Andrew and Bernie have tremendous credibility in my eyes. Please keep telling your story and putting the truth out there. One day people will wake up and realize that they were the crazy ones for never thinking out side of their own little worlds.ReplyDelete
All my Love and support towards Laura. I dont need to write anything. We understand where we are at in this world and know what we have to do. Folks who dont know what this is about... Find out!! David Wilcock, George Kavassilas, Nassim Haramien ... Laura M. E. also.. ;)Delete
This case and comments, as with most of our so called 'whistleblower' testimonies, is so sadly lacking in any fact or researched material, and simply trades on the idea that because we're not being told everything, anything MUST be happening!ReplyDelete
When will everyone stop overrating their own importance on this varied, marvelous and ever changing planet upon which we live. You all make the mistake of thinking that the human species matters, that you, we, matter. One need only look around to become aware of how incredibly unimportant and inconsequential in the grand scheme of nature, it itself only being a infeitssimal part of the grand scheme of the universe, we are.
Get off your high horses and go do something useful.
wow, that's not very positive outlook for life.. If people & Earth is so insignificant than perhaps we should just Nuke the place & be done with it..Delete
Also your "go do something useful".. What would that be..? Work to pay my mortgage..? Pay my taxes..? Enlist to army & go kill me some "enemies"..? I wonder what is "useful" to you..?
I have emails, articles and documents for God’s sake. Maybe that is why I still get invited to be interviewed. I have been vetted, I have witnesses and plenty of other whistleblower testimony and have shared the names and organizations. People watch one interview or see just a few things and they are so busy judging and projecting that they miss so much.Delete
LMAO she responded to the "name-calling brat" by calling names.ReplyDelete
What's wrong with her responding by calling names? She's still human like all of us, after all, no? Just because I profess whatever principals doesn't mean I can't be like everyone else, does it? Or is this a general rule that must be followed?Delete
Finally! Someone almost as loony as me! Laura Eisenhower. Why am I more "loony"? Because much of her belief is mainstream conspiracy stuff. But let's start with some basic "proof" shall we? Yellow 5 and 6 is industrial waste and they are illegal in many countries. So why does the U.S. allow these and many other harmful chemicals in our food supply? You should find out. Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference a day before 9/11 informing the media that the U.S. somehow misplaced 2.3 trillion dollars. Do you think the American people remembered the 2.3 trillion dollars that was "misplaced"? Nope. They were too busy hating the "terrorist". There were and still are many secret government projects. If only one of those secret projects were and are true with positive results, then red flags should be popping up, right? Millions of documented UFO sightings throughout the world and if only a small handful are legit, we should be thinking twice, right? There are trillions of planets throughout the known Universe, and to think that we are the only ones would be quite insane, right? "Religion" is a trillion dollar industry. I could go on and on, but my fingers are getting tired. So in conclusion, Laura Eisenhower is not a lunatic. She is simply aware of world around her. Neither Laura nor myself are 100% in our beliefs, but at least we're not too far from that number.ReplyDelete
Yeah, she's loony and I'm normal because my normalacy bias keeps me on a steady course with everyone else who's normal as we sail down the River DeNile. Tell me again why we are fighting a War on Terror while simultaneously leaving the borders open? That's my favorite story. :DDelete
I like your last comment gDelete
30 YEARS OF RESEARCH, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR, YA'LL MIGHT WANT TO DO YOUR HOME WORK. I KNOW SHE SOUNDS A LITTLE CRAZY, A LITTLE HIGH STUNG.MAKE KNOW MISTAKE THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF SHADY SHIT GOING ON BEFORE WE WERE BORN. AND JUST GETTING CRAZIER .THERE USED TO BE 1OR 2 SECRET BASES, NOW THEY ARE ALL AROUND THE WORLD. MOST PEOPLE DON'T KNOW YOU CAN DRIVEDelete
FROM WASHINGTON DC TO LAS VEGAS , ON A TWO LANE HIGH WAY UNDER GROUND, THERE IS MAG TRAINS, GROW ROOM ,FOOD STORAGE FOR WALMART,AND A LOT MORE
Mainstream conspiracy stuff? You sound intellectual and are saying nothing cause you have no inner worth? I am an independent researcher that got out of a Mars recruitment and a life time of being targeted and was raised in a Presidential family. Yeah, typical shit right? I mean, I’m trying to heal and am not groomed or trained to be a public person and I honestly don’t care to be on camera. So why would anyone want to kick someone already struggling with PTSD. You don’t know me and what I’ve gone through. I appreciate the supportive comments here though and the rest of you who laugh at me and call me a loon. God only knows what you should be labeled for contributing nothing but smear campaigns against hard working people trying to help humanity.Delete
I have done extensive research on the topic and encourage the same. Laura speaks the truth. Thank you Laura! May God continue to bless you 🙏Delete
To be honest, there's more historical proof of the existence of Jesus Christ than ancient UFOs and the myths connected.if laura is a Christian then surely Jesus is our saviour and god will prevail and deliver us from evil.the bible has many truths and answers but knowing which part(s) is meant to be taken literally is debatable. Its down to interpretation.to quote Jesus " the truth shall set you free" but what is truth? You cannot attach a myth to gaps in unknown history.its simply lost or unknown methods used in those times.just cause something is unexplained does not mean alien intervention.ReplyDelete
I am listening to an interview on youtube at the moment by Alfred Webre. I'm not sure what to think. I stopped it a couple of times and told myself, wow, this is worse than listening to Dan Burisch or Billy Meier stuff. I just hear a lot of things that there isn't much evidence for. I hear good arguments and information that has second hand information supporting it, but nothing concrete. I hear the suggestion, 'let's get this all out on the table'. Then what? How do you support the information with hearsay or second hand data? In my opinion there are some things I hear that do have support from good sources, but then a lot of far out ideas thrown in to muddy it all up. The story about Eisenhower's meeting with aliens has a little real support in the form of witnesses. We have people like Fife Symington (former AZ governor) coming out and providing real information, FAA chief of accidents/investigations John Callahan providing real solid data, and astronauts like Gordon Cooper straight up telling us they saw a flying saucer land on a dry lake bed and got video. It's hard to take things like reptilians and galactic federations seriously when there is no solid data on those subjects. Not saying they aren't there, but I think it's important to be careful about the information we focus on especially in the public eye. When you see Gordon Cooper say himself in several videos that he watched a saucer land and put 3 landing gear out, then take off again, you can't take that lightly. Why in the world would someone like that or an FAA official lie? But when I hear someone say reptilians are pulling the strings in high positions of power around the world, that is much harder to swallow. Documents please. Or testimony from someone who truly has a lot to lose (military, government official, highly respected scientist or astronaut).Delete
After reading her rambling and disturbing biography ( http://cosmicgaia2012.com/about.html#2 ) I confess to being appalled that this poor tortured soul was not properly diagnosed with BiPolar Disorder and treated as a child. The symptoms, the assorted psychoses, the related delusions, all were glaringly apparent. Calling her a loon is hardly productive. She appears to be coping as best she can. What she clearly needed a very long time ago was a well qualified and emotionally understanding physician.ReplyDelete
I was raised Buddhist, but was a born again Christian for many years.. Now a conspiracy theorist/light worker.. I have concluded that Laura is one of the most level headed human beings living on this planet. I truley believed that if someonene thought she was a Looney, and we set up a live debate for the both of them, Laura would win, hands down.. And would probably make a fool out of the other person. If anyone would have the guts to confront her in a live debate.. I would love to watch it.Delete
Harry, Harry, Harry time maybe to completely change your views..again. She seriously reminds me of an heroin addict.Delete
Your a piece of shit. You know that? What mental disorder would you call someone like you? I raised two amazing kids pretty must single handedly, have degrees and certifications in wilderness expedition leadership where you need to be very mentally strong and sounds and have thousands of clients I have assisted. Sorry your balls haven’t dropped yet and your matrix controlled brain can’t wrap your head around certain concepts, so you have to throw a little tantrum and create accusations about a persons mental health. Look in the mirror and look into narcissistic personality disorder.Delete
Many of these rich political families are known to horribly abuse their children. Such "delusions of grandeur" are often a survival mechanism. I have no idea if this is the case here (I don't make diagnoses based on online articles), but is this is the case, why berate her? How does that make you better or more evolved?ReplyDelete
For all I know, Laura could be who she claims. Why not? It is now in her best interests to live up to the claim. And if she does so, it could only benefit humanity. ;)
We are not a trust fund family. People think I’m rich and it’s a laugh. Thank you though for your thoughts and fair assessment without being horribly awful like so many others. I have been on welfare and food stamps. Ike didn’t sell out and we are not in the Illuminati bloodlines. I wasn’t horribly abused, I was heavily targeted though. I help abuse victims.Delete
I think we can all agree that nobody really knows anything for sure 100% about anything. Just because you cannot experience something directly or it cannot for some reason be measured or scientifically validated does not negate its existence, although i know for a fact that the hard core "science minds" would crucify me for that statement. In any case, To call someone a Loon or to have a page dedicated to exposing loons is derogatory and extremely immature. Its baby-ish non-sense and lacking in good character. I think Laura has some very valuable things to say. If you dig deep beyond the reptillian/ET stuff, there is real value in her teachings about the human journey, transformation, awakening, and using our difficulties as fertile ground for growth and enlightenment. This Blogger need to grow up. He/She is obviously afraid of change... afraid of personal growth... and enjoys smearing people that have things of spiritual value to teach humanity to rise higher in its evolution.ReplyDelete
"I think we can all agree that nobody really knows anything for sure 100% about anything."Delete
Sure. Good critical thinking means *tailoring your confidence to the evidence*, nothing more.
"Just because you cannot experience something directly or it cannot for some reason be measured or scientifically validated does not negate its existence, although i know for a fact that the hard core "science minds" would crucify me for that statement."
No. But it *is* a fallacious argument from ignorance. Science is a method - the only one we have - that circumvent our natural biases and psychological proclivities (by definition: a scientific approach *just is* one where sound measures are taken to prevent bias, fallacies or shortcomings of human experiences to color the result). If you disagree with the results of science, it means that you reject the results of an approach that manages to see beyond biases and prejudices, in favor of claims you have *not* arrived at through such methods. It doesn't put you in a particularly good light.
"He/She is obviously afraid of change... afraid of personal growth... and enjoys smearing people that have things of spiritual value to teach humanity to rise higher in its evolution."
I am still baffled by the fact that some people fail to see the irony in claims like that, so maybe I will have to spell it out: You disagree with me, but instead of providing evidence, you *engage in psychological projections about my motivations* - that is, you are trying to smear me and describe me as afraid of change, babyish, immature, lacking in good character and so on - which is precisely what you also accuse me of doing.
The difference is, of course, that you are engaged in an ad hominem fallacy (X is close-minded; therefore X's claims are wrong), whereas I am not. I provide ample evidence that the claims in question are silly, and conclude that the promoters of such claims are loons, which is at least not fallacious.
Really you sound so sure of yourself. Maybe message the people directly and have some respect. Ask them for more evidence. There is nothing but proof, evidence, witnesses and documents on my end but you clearly fail as a researcher and a decent human being. I can’t present it all in every interview.Delete
Oh.. thanks for all that clarification. What would us little, stupid people do without those self righteous linear thinking left brain geniuses! Hail to the Scientists... and All Knowing!ReplyDelete
Tell you what: You run your whole life by using the scientific method to direct all your choices and actions. Luckily we have free will... so that gives me the right to use science, personal experience and intuition blended together - a method the honors the totality of our brains... both right and left hemipheres.
Sadly science negates the experience of anything beyond what can be measured scientifically and calls people Loons and Nut Jobs when they happen to have experiences that cannot be measured in a way that is acceptable to Science.
Close minded-ness and black and white thinking is not very intelligent despite how intelligent and superior you "think" you really are.
Again, try to look beyond the reptillian thing and seek the higher message she is trying to teach. There is only good things to be found. Sadly, you seem to have the proclivity to want to trash anything that would lead people to healing their lives.
... and then we play the victim card. While at the same time smugly asserting superiority by dismissing me as close-minded. Classy.Delete
Of course, you also miss the point. Open-mindedness means being open to the possibility that you are wrong, and adjusting your beliefs when you are provided with evidence that you are, indeed, wrong. It does emphatically *not* mean sticking to whatever you'd like to believe in the face of all contrary evidence.
As an open-minded person, I know a lot about the biases we humans are desperately prone to be subject to. Humans are horrible at figuring out how the world actually works, and there are good, and psychologically well-documented reasons for that. Science is the name for *the* method we have for circumventing these biases (including close-mindedness). And I mean that as a definition: If you apply any method to overcome confirmation bias, availability errors, common human mistakes about probabilities, memory biases, motivated reasoning, the Dunning-Kruger effect and so on, you *are* investigating the matter scientifically.
In other words, and in danger of repeating myself, if science has provided evidence for X, that means that the methods used to circumvent biases and bad thinking, show us that X is the case. That also means that if you believe "not X", you are doing so for reasons that you have *not* arrived at by controlling for biases and psychological proclivities.
In other words, it means that you don't care about the evidence if it goes against what you believe for reasons that are *not* evidence-based.
And that is the very definition of being dogmatic, the opposite of open-mindedness.
Being open-minded means following the evidence even if it takes you in directions you might not have wanted. Continuing to believe in things that evidence says is bunk - such as the stuff peddled by Laura Eisenhower - is dogmatism, not open-mindedness. And when you throw in ad hominems against scientists and the people who really take the effort to thoroughly investigate the evidence, the results don't exactly present you as an example of open-mindedness and reason.
But yes, you are, of course, free to do whatever you wish, and I don't want to take that away from you. But you don't get the right to expect me to consider it anything but ridiculous.
Cant Prove it, so doesnt exist, your a Loon, end of story... and you call that open mindedness - ok, gotcha.Delete
I never once said that I believe everything that she said is a truth.
What I did try to do was point you in the direction of considering the deeper more psychological underpinnings of her teachings that seem to mirror the teachings of psychologist Carl Jung.
Do you know anything about psychology? Have you ever experienced periods in your life of difficulty and pain that prompted a positive transformation of some aspect of yourself/life? Do you know what EGO is? Do you know what psychological/emotional wounds you have, and have you healed them? Do you understand your more destructive side ... your shadow? Do you understand the connection between the emotions and physical health, and the mind and physical health? These are some of the things that Laura touches on, how these things operate and strategies for living the best lives we can live.
I doubt you have any interest in these things and lack any understanding of these concepts because you have a robotic linear thinking mentality that compartmentalizes humans as separate parts that have no connection with each other. Body separate... mind separate... emotions separate. Give a drug to treat each and thats where the buck stops. You believe people to be robots devoid of a spirit or soul, simply meat and bone bags. There are deeper underpinnings to humans that science cannot measure, and to you, that means they dont exist, so you mock and ridicule others experiences and shame them for what they have experienced personally, on an inner level, a personal level, that cant be studied or quantified.
I actually feel very sorry for you and the way you view life and people.
Thank you so much for sharing this!!Delete
"Cant Prove it, so doesnt exist, your a Loon, end of story... and you call that open mindedness - ok, gotcha."ReplyDelete
So, instead of even trying to address the point, you create a completely ridiculous straw man, dismiss it by appealing to the character traits you attribute to that straw man, and then declare victory by smugly asserting your superiority. Nice.
Psychology is a serious field of study, and does not resemble anything remotely what you describe. ("Body separate ... mind separate ... emotions separate" - what is that even supposed to mean?) Psychology also does a very good job of explaining the origins and sources of people's inner experiences, without appealing to magic, chi, ectoplasm or a medieval understanding of how human minds work. Your objections to a scientific approach to these things suggest that you reject all of this carefully assembled knowledge in favor of a fantasy world of magic.
"There are deeper underpinnings to humans that science cannot measure, and to you, that means they dont exist"
Wait, what? If science cannot measure them, what reason do *you* have to think they exist? After all, ask yourself this: Do the forces (or whatever) have any noticeable *effects* whatsoever (such as psychological effects)? If they do, then those effects can be measured. And that's how science measure forces in any case - by observing the effects, including psychological effects.
Conversely, if there are forces the effects of which cannot be measured, it must be because they have no observable effects whatsoever on anything (including psychological effects). But if these forces have no effects on anything, including your experiences, why do you think they exist?
Your inner life is yours to define. No one is going to tell you how you should experience things, what you imagine or feel. What you don't have any authority over is the explanations for why you feel that way, or the causes of these experiences. That's the domain of psychology, and psychology does a good job of that. There are, of course, plenty of things we don't know, but that doesn't mean that you get to fill the gaps in our knowledge with whatever mythology you fancy. That we don't know the causes or mechanisms underpinning some phenomenon is *not* evidence that it is whatever magic you would like it to be.
And by the way: You repeatedly say that you don't accept everything Eisenhower says. However, you haven't specified what you accept and what you reject either. You can also stop feeling sorry for me, and at least stop using smug assertions of pity as a debate tactic - it's a ridiculous and blatantly dishonest strategy.
Funny, instead of your initials G.D., perhaps you should just smugly insert an "O" between the 2 letters. That would more accurately represent yourself, or at least how you view yourself.ReplyDelete
"Funny, instead of your initials G.D., perhaps you should just smugly insert an "O" between the 2 letters. That would more accurately represent yourself, or at least how you view yourself."ReplyDelete
Interesting gambit. I don't claim to know everything; instead, I admit that I may very well be wrong and am prepared to change my mind if anyone provides any good reasons for it. Rather, *you* are the one who claims to know of forces not measurable to science, and *you* are the one who claims that I am close-minded, narrow-minded and lacking knowledge and information, and *you* are the one who smugly reject the scientific approach when it conflicts with what you choose to believe.
So who is it, then, who puts a lot of faith in their own abilities and opinions again?
Wow you guys are awesome, ROFL. I wish you both a Happy New Years. And may i suggest you look into the Resonance Project. Science and the O cult coming together. And remember we shall all prevail as we are all part of the great I AM. Namaste...ReplyDelete
It is a typical abuse of the english language when CYNICS refer to themselves as skeptics. A skeptic is actually still looking for evidence to either support or refute various claims. A cynic is merely a sardonic and ofter bitter critic of anything he finds himself unable to understand. We all know about the "wolf in sheep's clothing" metaphor. Well, here's another one for you. Be ware of the CYNIC in skeptics garb" (in this case garb is also short for garbage). A cynic typically works overtime turning real FOOD FOR THOUGHT into GARBage.ReplyDelete
Dear Laura and Editor, Laura I am with you 100% on every level including your need to respond back. Unfortunately, I understand the Editors brick wall problem on the human level. He has not moved on from any level other than being a human skeptic?? as he calls himself. Laura you know all too well unfortunately that you cannot nor should you waste time trying to move these types of people out of their earth bound 3D virtual reality. Only those who know they are predetermined to move on with the shift can move out of their Earth bound captivity and those who ask for scientific proof of these things are obviously not destined to awaken anytime soon. The time is so very very limited and we must put our energies into those that are making the transition and need additional energy and guidance as I am one of them. I was like the Editor but I also knew something was part of me and that I was chosen for something I could not explain until only the right time when I would not question what was happening. This is that time, however, I still have so many factual questions that keep pestering me while at the same time I am moving closer to the shift without having some of these answers but it does not keep me from moving into the next cosmic transition. I actually have sadness and sympathy to the Editor that he should be trying to find the way that is within himself instead of seeking out the worldly ones that are actually the only hope they have to find their real purpose for being. Laura was put here to be a guide and you want to crush one of your only hopes. You still have time, look harder, real hard deep into yourself for questions and answers, you will find them but only if you truly are seeking love and truth, instead of seeking negativity and facts. The universe does not provide facts in the way a mere human demands them. Hope to see you and meet you Laura at the Cosmic Conference in Phila, PA in April 2015. It will be our first and may be our last attendance to this type of conference as we get so very very close to transition time. A light being and supposed distant relative. Pretty sure we are all the descendents originally from HANNS Nicholas Eisenhauer from around back in 1746 or around that time, so say Wikipedia if you can believe it. But not really important at this point in time. Best to you both. but especially Mr. Editor known only as G.D. ????ReplyDelete
I hear you and thank you so much!! Someone directed my attention back to this site and should put away now but I appreciate what you have shared!Delete
Some of what she has to say has merit. The task at hand should be to discern which aspects are worthy of our consideration and which parts are not. An open inquiry approach is without bias and capable of exploring any and all topics and finding what aspects are true, or not true and discuss them. Resorting to logical fallacies such as ad hominem attacks is not the best way to argue against ideas. It is better to explain the topics discussed themselves and why we think they have merit, or not.ReplyDelete
This comment has been removed by the author.Delete
Tone trolling much, are we?Delete
"Some of what she has to say has merit."
No, it doesn't seem that way to me. Care to come up with any examples?
"An open inquiry approach is without bias and capable of exploring any and all topics and finding what aspects are true, or not true and discuss them"
Don't take it too personally, but this is the kind of thing people who don't understand the basics of critical thinking tend to say, and I think it's worth pointing out the problem with it. There *is no such thing as approaching an issue without bias*. It's not possible. Human psychology doesn't work that way. And that's why we need certain tools that will prevent the results of our inquiry from being colored by that bias. Those tools are what we call "science". *Discussion* is a very, very poor substitute.
"Resorting to logical fallacies such as ad hominem attacks"
There is a logical fallacy called "ad hominem", but I don't think it is what you think it is. I committed no ad hominem fallacies in my post. Calling someone "idiot" is not a logical fallacy. Being rude is not a fallacy.
The following argument type is *not* a logical fallacy:
1. A says that p
2. p is false
3. Therefore A is stupid
Depending on the premises, this can be a perfectly fine argument. It might be mean, of course, but once again: being mean is not a fallacy.
The following is an ad hominem fallacy:
1. A says p
2. A is an idiot.
3. Therefore p is false.
I did not make any argument of that form in my post but stuck to the first form.
The following *is* an ad hominem fallacy, however:
1. A says that p.
2. A is rude and mean
3. Therefore, I have reason to be suspicious of p.
Does that seem to be close to the argument you are making in your post (if you are making any argument at all)?
Maybe you need to find a hobby. I can’t believe how much attention you give this and you still are clueless. I don’t recall you ever attempting to get to know me and my credibility on a more personal level. You just sit there in the background throwing stones from an incredibly misinformed place. You clearly need better researching skills and human decency and investigation with a heart. I would have been happy to of talked with you directly to show you what you think is lacking here.Delete
Words are important. If you are so in touch with the higher self, why do you lower your self to the lowest common denominator of name calling too? This is not in line with the spirit of what you represent and claim to be? You are obviously well versed in your chosen field of belief and clearly well educated and more than capable as a human being.
I believe that UFO's exist too. Obviously, I could be wrong. Like yourself, there are many people with strong beliefs who are willing to face ridicule for what they believe to be truth. There is no doubt about your sincerity. However, I believe you are sincerely wrong. Thank you for your honesty about your personal struggle with anxiety. This walk you have chosen does not seem to give you peace. Why is that? Surely, this is the goal of existence? To be at peace with yourself? And you don't seem to be? No doubt there is some truth in your experience and story. But it appears to me that you have yet to sort the wheat from the chaff and the wood from the tree's. Take a break Laura, please, for your own sake. Come back to the canvas after taking that break and perhaps the picture may make more sense and come into clearer focus. You've gone too far down the rabbit hole for your own good. Come back and regroup a little. You may be yet wiser, clearer and stronger for doing so. I wish you peace.
Dear Laura is participating in a Conspira-Sea cruise where she reveals the troof about alkemi: http://www.divinetravels.com/ConspiraSeaCruise2016.htmlReplyDelete
" you are not serving humanity or the planet"ReplyDelete
Actually, they are doing a great service by calling out the misinformed, the mountebanks and the whackos (like the subject of this post).
Wow, see where that takes you in life. Pathetic bullies spitting on people who do all they can to help humanity.Delete
Laura, I just gotta say you are amazing!! We can't waste time or energy with people like this. Keep doing what you're doing!ReplyDelete
I have been a student of Laura for a couple of years and have had the privilege of meeting her in person twice. She's genuine and emits so much love! There are few people like her in the world. I am forever grateful that she's in my world. She is Source's gift to Gaia and Humanity. I'll say it again Laura. "I love you!"ReplyDelete
I love you too!!!Delete
I was very enlightened by G.D.'s comments. I came to this site after doing a Google on Laura E. She has made claims without explaining where, how, and why she got her info...true or not. (I suspected not) This left me wondering and thinking upon those I have known in my life who have disorders or caused chaos in their own lives due to drugs, psychological issues, abuse, and ultimately proven they cannot make sound and rational decisions in their life along the way (and wildly accusing me of being something they assume about me, after I had the audacity to point out the cause/effect of their decisions). Not saying Laura has any of that, because I cannot diagnose or know her like that. But the results appear the same. Furthermore, I have seen others prop themselves above others too much, especially on the internet. It doesn't mean some of what they are saying isn't true, but that also doesn't mean some or all of what they are saying is true. Those that know the truth are usually willing to educate/explain it to others without attack, assumptions, and a convoluted mix in between. They simply explain their own known position with facts, be it emotionally charged or not. In my observation, G.D. did a fine job. Whether or not that reply above is THE Laura E., whoever that person is, does not understand inner peace, higher thinking, and open-mindedness by expressing the truth without arrogance or attacks. Why does any of you attacking G.D. even care what is said on this blog? Write your own blog to counter it, if you think you have enough information to keep an intelligent, well-informed blog going. I see no valuable information on Laura E's website to help me discern what she says as true or to empower myself with the information she makes claims to. Bottom line: it's all useless info towards my learning to actually affect or change my part of the world. What I have heard from videos where Laura E is the guest, leaves me with more questions than answers. WHERE does she get her INFORMATION to make such wild claims???? And I have been reading and watching these kinds of alien, light worker, conspiracy things since before the internet became a public forum. I've learned to observe the results of what people actually do and question WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHY, and HOW (a basic 4th grade comprehension concept to writing). Most people are not all that they say they are. It's hard to find people that don't lie or aren't themselves misled into tangents, making pieces fit in their minds that, in reality, don't fit logically. And by association and admiration of Andrew Basiago - his shady history of himself - I tend to be very cautious about believing Laura face value with no explanations. By the use of logic from the conspiracy/lightworker field: If the power elites set out to start a new age movement to dissuade us from the "real" issues, if the governments are a part of this pyramid of trickle down manipulations, then it only means that Laura, great granddaughter of Ike, is also privy to this private family information to divide and confuse the rest of us; And never really explain yourself and all the new age concepts you present so we are blindly left to believe everything you say at face value.ReplyDelete
Overall, I have learned that if I disagree with anyone emotionally charged by their own ideas, strung together and weaved tightly with other erroneous ideas that are not actually tied to the same subject, they will not listen no matter how much I put a pleasant bow on it to make it palatable for them. Therefore, I save myself the mental gymnastics to appeal to the ignorant, and just call a spade a spade.
Laura Madeleine Bradshaw Mahon's daddy is a CATHOLIC priest. She is related to Nixon too. Susan Eisenhower endorsed Obama. George KVassilas was the original Horus down under. Tired of the ebolies.ReplyDelete
I am not related to Nixon. And are you your parents and ancestors? No just a low life that spits on others for self work. My uncle married a Nixon though.Delete
Lara, I went to Westtown School with your mother Susan. What does she think about your ideas, theories, and life leanings?Delete
It's always fascinating to me that the people who are supposedly enlightened and more sophisticated and have "seen the truth" also have horrible grammar and spelling skills.ReplyDelete
I can't figure out how she's related to Ike. Ike and Mamie had two sons, John and Doud. Doud died age 3, so John is the only one to have had children. Of those children, only David Eisenhower (with Julie Nixon) had children, none of whom is Laura. Who the heck is this person?ReplyDelete
I thought she was normal and found out otherwise, she is an American loon like y'all said, and far from the real McCoy that's too bad I had high hopes for this women, but she turned out to be just another Looney binDelete
I think she's the daughter of Susan Eisenhower (daughter of John). She is not listed in the Eisenhower family tree on Wikipedia, though I don't know what the significance of that might be.Delete
Her mom is Susan Eisenhower, an expert in international security and space policy who worked for the Obama administration. Laura's delusions probably stem from those facts and a biochemical brain condition such as paranoid schizophrenia, hence the fear of being kidnapped and taken to Mars.Delete
I'm impressed at the effort G. D. puts into responses to irrational and fallacious commentators. I sometimes do this on Facebook, but I seriously lack the patience to perpetually instruct every credulous (and nearly entirely emotionally driven) person I encounter on attaining and exercising their own critical thinking skills.ReplyDelete
I'm appreciating this list. I've learned that there's considerable scientific consensus that aspartame doesn't cause cancer (though i never knew it was implicated as such), and I spent about two or more hours investigating just one minor aspartame-claimed issue (headaches) on pubmed, becoming frustrated by discovering a link between the authors and Pfizer (long story short: I tried to follow the research path and the papers, but the low participant count, conflicting results, and possible author relationships to Pfizer left me concluding that there's no conclusion, rather than taking either stance). It was a wholly frustrating experience and it is telling why so many intellectually lazy, credulous, or simply critical thinking inexperienced people jump at whatever conclusion best suits their ideologies.
Anyway, thanks for the interesting read, for getting me to dive down a rabbit hole of published studies that I normally don't have the patience to do to such an exhausting degree, and for demonstrating good responses to people with anti-intellectual proclivities/insecurities.
Who is Laura Magdelene Eisenhower and what's up with the proof? No answers yet...Not on wikipedia family tree...would she be a name change like Obama? Hardly anybody knows who they are...lot's of theories...It looks like a young lady that want to make money online and giving lectures in the new age set up....If she's a granddaughter of Eisenhower by Susan or Mary (showing unmarried with no decendents https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Eisenhower#Family_tree) she's not an Eisenhower by a father named Eisenhower but by an unmarried mother...so if that's the reason not to be in the family tree....no married mom....If mom was married she usually would have another last name....She looks like Ike...that's sure....but she's disowned I guess? Using the last name....is like why since nobody can figure it out without seeing the explanation on her website. I mean if there's a reason to keep a big mystery out there...I don't get it....she's clearly using the name for a reason of becoming well known.ReplyDelete
I'm getting trashed by a woman who thinks Laura Eisenhower is part of fake news since she's not in the Eisenhower book she read extensively...This really needs some clearing up....useless to use the name without being able to explain the non recognition of her existence as an Eisenhower.ReplyDelete
The author was more about shaming than understanding the wisdom of Laura. I've lived almost 70 years, 50 years exactly on this woman's wave and I'm not batshit crazy.ReplyDelete
Laura, from everything I've heard or read you never provide any specific information. It's all gibberish that you expect others to believe with no supporting evidence, just a bunch of meaningless words and phrases. Besides, if your ego is not involved as he asserts why do you appear angry or even care what he things? More red flags.ReplyDelete
You need to slow down a bit Laura. I feel many of these negative comments are here simply because your delivery is too rushed. If you want us to pay attention you need to focus on perhaps some things that you could validate even a little. You claim to be everything but the second coming and yet no proof of anything is presented. Left me feeling somewhat sorry for you. Not trying to hate just my impression after watching a few of your videos. Slow down, breathe and structure your thoughts better. Otherwise, more power to you and best of wishes.ReplyDelete
she is the daughter of susan eisenhower what does her mother think about her viewsReplyDelete
Laura clearly doesn't know how the Mars Photo's are actually produced. They are built up over many layers using different color filters, a good HD picture of the Martian Surface can take many hours to produce. Add also into the picture the time it takes for the communications signal to make it back to Earth and then for Earth to send an acknowledgement signal and that's at least another Four Minutes added for every single frame. In conclusion any alleged "Living Creature" in the Mars Photo's must be standing perfectly still for long periods of time, possibly hours, to even show up on the images. This must be something that the Dark Powers in the Secret Government neglected to tell Andrew Basiago and Laura Magdalene Eisenhower before they sent them to Mars ;)ReplyDelete
I was recruited to go but never went. Andrew Basiago says he did, I haven't and have never claimed to have been to Mars.Delete
Just because most of you are multi-dimensionally challenged, no need to criticize this awakened individualReplyDelete
hahaha bless your heart. Frauds and scammers deserve to be criticized, and we have a responsibility to do it.Delete
I actually think that the moment we step into the public eye and tell our story, we have to accept that there are those who will criticize us. I embrace my critics. They don't bother me. It's okay. Everyone has the right to believe or not believe in someone else's story. I dare to stand alone, bravely speaking my truth, and I give less than a glance towards my critics. Criticism can open up conversation. It can also open up for gang-stalking. To speak out means having to have a tough skin.Delete
Very soon your governments will start disclosing the same information she has been teaching for years. Not in the same way of course, they will make you brainwashed sheep to believe they have just made contact. It sounds crazy because you know nothing about it and they have been feeding you these things as science fiction all your life. I would literally pay to see the look on all your faces when sh!t hits the fan. WAKE UP!!!Delete
This site is bogus and full of shit, probably run by some lower level illuminati. I'll wait for you to approve this hahhaha, I have already broken the code and see through you all!! lolololDelete
I grew up in a cult as a child and wrote a book about it. Luckily, or unluckily, depending on how one views it, there were dozens of other children. Having that evidence and support for my story is invaluable to me. Some of the things we experienced and witness are difficult for even my to wrap my head around. And I went through it. So to ask others to wrap their heads around it, I can understand when they just shake their head. It goes against their cognitive dissonance. A crack emerges. Things too horrific to imagine seep in. The brain shuts down.ReplyDelete
Because of my experiences, I remain open to all perspectives in regard to other people's experiences and stories. I don't take those perspectives on as my own experience and then discount them. I don't have an "opinion" about whether they're truth or not. I may have a guttural feeling, but I think that is something given to me, just for me.
Is is not a secret that our government keeps secrets. I am from a generational family with a father who worked in government special projects. Special project children are prime children to use for any type of genome testing because of the genetics/DNA of their hosts. If wouldn't surprise me to find out the Cabal was attempting to preserve their own DNA away from a planet they're carelessly destroying.
So, whether it's true; whether it's not, matters not to me. Unless I've been presented with all of the factual information, the researcher and journalist in me, won't allow me to form an opinion. I have to keep digging until I've ruled out all possibilities and/or find the evidence I need to fairly form an opinion.
Keep digging. I hope that you continue to research and when you present your facts, do so from a journalistic, neutral perspective. Thanks for providing more links.
We are in a most interesting time indeed. <3
When the sh!t hits the fan and they start to slowly disclose the things Laura has been talking about......mayneeee I would pay to see the look on all your faces calling her a nut!!!ReplyDelete
Laura don’t worry about this loon. We need you. :-)ReplyDelete
Listening to laura on f2b now. She seem very interesting and intelligent. Haters gonna hate.ReplyDelete
Intelligence does not equal honestyReplyDelete
Thanks everyone for these comments! Yes, I got reactive and I am not perfect, so there you go! Those comments are gone. Just google my name and look to the right and you will see who is listed as family members. The family tree online does not include my sisters or some of my cousins. Besides Davids kids -- my Aunt Mary and Ann both have one child, my mom 3 and David 3.ReplyDelete
I am honored to be featured on this site!! Thank you!ReplyDelete
Laura, you look just like Mary-Louise Parker.Delete
You should change gears and seek out a new life. Nothing is in your way, from leaving the trouble behind you. I feel as though you would achieve red carpet success if you were to explore a life in Hollywood. Become an actress, I believe in your ability to do this.
Use it as a means to achieve further goals. There is so much more you can accomplish, all you need is a little stepping stone to get there. An acting career, is what some people use their whole life to achieve. For you, it would be a stepping stone, to assist you in going on to something far more significant.
Blue E November
My message disappeared. Have you heard from Satoshi Nakamoto? I have a feeling you may need to explore an acting career. You look and sound like a young Mary-Louise Parker.Delete
It could be a stepping stone for you, to achieve something greater. You're a natural talent. I can see so much more for you, if you just change gears for a little while. Sometimes instead of climbing a wall, you may find it more worthwhile to just walk around it.
You’re going to feel stupid when u realize she’s right though lol!ReplyDelete
Normally when people can back up their statements with irrifutable proof or if they are doing an investigation getting too close or stepping over the fine line, they wind up dead. She may have that proof but confronting the issues in this manner instead, so she doesnt wind up 6 ft under!ReplyDelete
She is not an Eisenhower. Who knows who she really is. But check Wikipedia's President Eisenhower's family tree. There is no Laura Eisenhower on it and no implication anywhere of any illegitimate children. Ike's granddaughter who I believe she claims is her mother (Susan) only had one daughter and it isn't her. I would think that the author of this piece would have checked her claims before presenting them as true.ReplyDelete
The wikepedia family tree says no, however an old article from 2010 interviews Susan Eisenhower and she says she has 3 children and one of them is named Laura. I have seen this article. One guy on the web says he thinks Susan thinks her daughter Laura is an embarrassment to the family so she disavowed her and removed all mention of Laura in the presidential library and on the web etc. I also cant find her birthdate either on any search engine. When I lived in Las Vegas in 2012, I met a female security guard who claimed to be the illegitimate child of John Travolta. I also worked with a bus driver who claimed to teach Tom Cruise how to fly in Top Gun. I found out on YouTube that story is false. There was a navy pilot that did actually do that but it wasnt my coworker like he claims.ReplyDelete