One has
to give it to the pseudoscientists: The attempts of “integrative” (yes, those are dick quotes) medicine practitioners to infiltrate otherwise
respectable medical institutions and academia have been frighteningly
successful, partially of course due to the resources made available by
misguided and/or delusional wealthy donors and the erosion of standards in medical practice by leaving important decisions to administrators.
One bad
example Thomas Jefferson University, a private health sciences
university in Philadelphia, and Jefferson University Hospitals. They actually have an Integrative
Pediatrics Program at Jefferson (indeed, it appears to be part of the the Myrna
Brind Center Of Integrative Medicine), the director of which is one Dr.
Christina DiNicola. DiNicola used to be a real pediatrician, but then she did
an additional two-year integrative medicine fellowship under the direction of
Andrew Weil.
At present you probably shouldn’t trust her even on basic advice on how to
interact with kids.
A good picture of DiNicola can probably be gleaned from her
blogpost (for the JUH Blog) “Is
Integrative Medicine Right for Your Kids? 5 Myths Debunked” (discussed here),
which really rather confirms how unscientific, pseudoscientific and
anti-scientific integrative medicine is. One of the first thing you’ll notice
is the extent to which DiNicola has to emphasize, at every turn, how her
servicees “are different from and not a replacement for good primary
care pediatric services.” A sample of the “myths”:
- “Myth #1: All of the integrative
therapies on the market are unproven.” DiNicola’s response? She’ll help guide
you through the available options. Of course, the vast majority of alternative
therapies are unproven – by definition. DiNicola doesn’t discuss that.
- “Myth #2: If my pediatrician
doesn’t mention or recommend integrative medicine, then I shouldn’t consider
it.” Oh, but you see, the reason real pediatricians don’t mention it may be
because they’re afraid of being ridiculed. (Yes, there is a conspiracy lurking
in the background – the hallmark of all pseudoscience.) Or because they may be “unaware” of the research – or
because they know that actual
research indicates no benefit for the treatments, but DiNicola doesn’t consider
that option.
- “Myth #5: Integrative medicine only
benefits certain diseases and conditions.” According to DiNicola, however, it
can be used for anything. Well, I suppose I have to agree that alternative
medicine is equally effective across the board, but for somewhat different
reasons.
Of
course, DiNicola is careful about avoiding making too specific claims,
mentioning only yoga and acupuncture explicitly. Indeed, the whole website for
the Integrative Pediatrics program is pretty vague about what they do and even
more nebulous about why they think it is effective (funny that). Instead, one
gets some idiotic tropes like “[s]ome people believe external forces (energies) from
objects or other sources directly affect a person’s health. An example of
external energy therapy is electromagnetic therapy.” Indeed, some people
believe that.
The Myrna
Brind Center Of Integrative Medicine is a different matter, describing clinical trials of high dose intravenous vitamin C in pancreatic cancer,
acupuncture, bioidentical hormones,
and even an integrative mental health program.
Diagnosis:
Yes, the dark side is tempting, and many give in. DiNicola has completed her
journey, and there seems to be, currently, little good left in her.
As long as insurance companies can be counted on to hold the line... but how long will that be?
ReplyDeleteWhenever I hear "some people believe," I automatically become suspicious.
ReplyDelete