Rod J. Martin is an “independent researcher” and exceptionally
deluded creationist. His contribution to the third volume of the Answers Research Journal – the house journal of Answers in Genesis – actually managed to make a bit of a splash in the blogosphere. Titled “A Proposed Bible-Science Perspective on Global Warming”,
the article attempts to use Genesis to justify Martin’s global warming
denialism. The level of scholarship may be suggested by Martin’s assertion that
“[p]roposed secular solutions to the alleged claims of global warming will
directly impact everyone who depends on fossil fuels for their current life
style. The issue of global warming presents biblical creationists with an
opportunity to demonstrate not only the efficacy of Scripture in addressing
life’s issues, but also to show how ignoring Scripture leads to unnecessary,
expensive, and harmful actions. Global warming is an arena where the battle
between biblical truth and evolutionary untruths is currently raging.” Note the
nice insertion of “secular”.
What is his evidence? “The earth is huge. We simply do not
have a sufficient number of collection points (weather stations) to accurately
determine earth’s average surface temperature,” and his claim that “[t]he level
of CO2 in our atmosphere could increase over 1,300% before reaching the current
mine safety limit […] Today’s atmospheric concentration of CO2 is clearly safe
for humans, and will be for over a thousand years at today’s rate of increase,”
which is not a point that is particularly relevant to the issue of global
warming.
The clincher, however, is his assertion that “CO2 and O2
were created early in the Creation week. Neither of these gases evolved.” Take
that, you evolutionary climatologists. “It must be kept in mind that global
warming advocates are predominantly evolutionists,” says Martin. Then there are
some points about homosexuality, conspiracy theories, and an argument that
humans should not be concerned about the environment since God will provide and
He never told Adam to protect the Amazon.
The article is discussed in some detail here.
Diagnosis: Not a high-profile figure, but he has at least
put his face forward at one point, thereby revealing himself to be so
shockingly dense and stupid that it is hard not to stare.
The two primary drivers of average global temperatures explain the reported up and down measurements since before 1900 with 90% accuracy and provide credible estimates back to the low temperatures of the Little Ice Age (1610).
ReplyDeleteCO2 change is NOT one of the drivers.
The drivers are given at
http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com/