Kyle Butt
has both a B.A. with a double major in Bible and communications, and an M.A. in New Testament. Clearly
his science education is impeccable, and he seems to be viewed as a lofty
authority in the circles he frequents, i.e. the hallways of the Bible
department at Apologetics Press.
His scientific outreach consists of being a speaker at at youth rallies, lectureships,
Gospel meetings, “and so on”, and he is apparently editor for the Apologetics
Press’s Discovery Magazine, “a colorful monthly magazine on Scripture and
science for kids,” concerned mostly with miracles, Bible apologetics, and
disproving evolution.
As you’d
expect, Butt is an ludicrously insane young earth creationist who claims to
have (conclusive) evidence for the flood. Unfortunately, Butt’s ability to
distinguish evidence from imagination is less than fully developed, and his
reasoning skills are not quite impeccable either. Here is his own argument that since science has made mistakes before – giving one example of a (putative) mistake that science itself corrected –
the Bible is an accurate portrayal of verifiable reality, and “the idea that
scientific ’findings’ trump every other source of information is simply false.”
As he so eloquently puts it: “information in science books changes from year to
year. […] Yet the biblical text has stood for centuries. Its integrity has surpassed
that of any book ever printed. And the scientific information in it coincide
perfectly with all factual data.” Assigning the (putative) unchanging commands
of the Bible to dogma and confirmation bias in the face of falsifying evidence
apparently doesn’t cross his mind. And all gaps in knowledge are evidence for the existence of God.
There are some comments on his work here,
and here.
Together
with one Eric Lyons, Butt wrote “Dinosaurs Unleashed: A True Story Of Dinosaurs
And Humans”, which is, needless to say, not a true story. It is picked apart in some detail here.
Butt has also penned an interesting treatise;
see comment 18 in this link) called “Defending the Bible’s Position on Slavery.”
Diagnosis:
As the saying goes he tends to pull his ideas out of himself. Probably
relatively unimportant, but his stuff gets linked to by the most incoherent
internet trolls from time to time.
Your supposed "rebuttal" is about as unscientific and illogical as it gets. Calling the author a liar and stating a different belief, without providing any evidence to support your assertions, is nothing more than being argumentative. I expect that your response will be something to the effect of, "Is too...".
ReplyDeleteKyle, is that you?!
Delete....
DeleteThose who choose to not believe the truth when its logically presented to them will go to any length to defend their illogical position and discredit anyone who logically challenge what they have chosen to believe.
ReplyDeleteDoes he now Beavus?
ReplyDelete